medigraphic.com
ISSN 1659-1046 (Print)
Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences

2020, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Odovtos-Int J Dent Sc 2020; 22 (3)

Influence of Powder-to-Gel Ratio on Physicochemical Properties of a Calcium Silicate Sealer

Torres FFE, Perinoto P, Bosso-Martelo R, Chávez-Andrade GM, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Tanomaru-Filho M

Language: English
References: 38
Page: 154-162
PDF size: 210.67 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Differences in liquid-to-powder ratio can affect the properties of calcium silicate-based materials. This study assessed the influence of powder-to-gel ratio on physicochemical properties of NeoMTA Plus. Setting time (minutes), flow (mm and mm˛), pH (at different periods), radiopacity (mm Al) and solubility (% mass loss) were evaluated using the consistencies for root repair material (NMTAP-RP; 3 scoops of powder to 2 drops of gel) and root canal sealer (NMTAP-SE; 3 scoops of powder to 3 drops of gel), in comparison to Biodentine cement (BIO) and TotalFill BC sealer (TFBC). Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey tests (α=0.05). BIO had the shortest setting time, followed by NMTAP-RP and NMTAP-SE. TFBC showed the highest setting time and radiopacity. BIO, NMTAP-RP, and NMTAP-SE had similar radiopacity. All materials promoted an alkaline pH. NMTAP-RP/SE presented lower solubility than BIO and TFBC. Regarding the flow, TFBC had the highest values, followed by NMTAP-SE, and NMTAP-RP. BIO had the lowest flow. In conclusion, NMTAP in both powder-to-gel ratios showed high pH and low solubility. The increase in the powder ratio decreased the setting time and flow. These findings are important regarding the proper consistency and work time to clinical application.


REFERENCES

  1. Tanomaru-Filho M., Viapiana R., GuerreiroTanomaru J.M. From MTA to New Biomaterials Based on Calcium Silicate. Odovtos-Int. J. Dental Sc. 2016; 18 (1): 18-22.

  2. Grazziotin-Soares R., Nekoofar M.H., Davies T., Hubler R., Meraji N., Dummer P.M.H. Crystalline phases involved in the hydration of calcium silicate-based cements: Semi-quantitative Rietveld X-ray diffraction analysis. Aust Endod J. 2019; 45 (1): 26-32.

  3. Cordeiro M.M., Santos A.S., Reyes C.J.F. Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and Calcium Hydroxide Promotes In Vivo Intratubular Mineralization. Odovtos-Int. J. Dental Sc. 2016;18 (1): 49-59.

  4. Camilleri J., Formosa L., Damidot D. The setting characteristics of MTA Plus in different environmental conditions. Int Endod J. 2013; 46 (9): 831-40.

  5. Parirokh M., Torabinejad M. Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review- -Part I: chemical, physical, and antibacterial properties. J Endod. 2010; 36 (1): 16-27.

  6. Keskin C., Sariyilmaz E., Kele S.A. The effect of bleaching agents on the compressive strength of calcium silicate-based materials. Aust Endod J. 2019; 45 (3): 311-16.

  7. Camilleri J. Staining Potential of Neo MTA Plus, MTA Plus, and Biodentine Used for Pulpotomy Procedures. J Endod. 2015;41 (7): 1139-45.

  8. Tran D., He J., Glickman G. N., Woodmansey K. F. Comparative Analysis of Calcium Silicate-based Root Filling Materials Using an Open Apex Model. J Endod. 2016; 42 (4): 654-8.

  9. Siboni F., Taddei P., Prati C., Gandolfi M.G. Properties of NeoMTA Plus and MTA Plus cements for endodontics. Int Endod J. 2017; 50 Suppl 2: e83-e94.

  10. Urkmez E.S. Pinar Erdem A. Bioactivity evaluation of calcium silicate-based endodontic materials used for apexification. Aust Endod J. 2020; 46 (1): 60-67.

  11. McMichael G. E., Primus C.M., Opperman L.A. Dentinal Tubule Penetration of Tricalcium Silicate Sealers. J Endod. 2016; 42 (4): 632-6.

  12. Singh S., Podar R., Dadu S., Kulkarni G., Purba R. Solubility of a new calcium silicatebased root-end filling material. J Conserv Dent. 2015;18 (2): 149-53.

  13. Camilleri J., Sorrentino F., Damidot D. Investigation of the hydration and bioactivity of radiopacified tricalcium silicate cement, Biodentine and MTA Angelus. Dent Mater. 2013; 29 (5): 580-93.

  14. Tanomaru-Filho M., Torres F. F. E., ChavezAndrade G.M., de Almeida M., Navarro L.G., Steier L., Guerreiro-Tanomaru J.M. Physicochemical Properties and Volumetric Change of Silicone/Bioactive Glass and Calcium Silicate-based Endodontic Sealers. J Endod. 2017; 43 (12): 2097-101.

  15. Camilleri J. Is Mineral Trioxide Aggregate a Bioceramic? Odovtos-Int. J. Dental Sc. 2016; 18 (1):13-17.

  16. Xuereb M., Vella P., Damidot D., Sammut C. V., Camilleri J. In situ assessment of the setting of tricalcium silicate-based sealers using a dentin pressure model. J Endod. 2015; 41 (1): 111-24.

  17. Zhou H.M., Shen Y., Zheng W., Li L., Zheng Y.F., Haapasalo M. Physical properties of 5 root canal sealers. J Endod. 2013; 39 (10): 1281-6.

  18. Zordan-Bronzel C.L., Esteves Torres F.F., Tanomaru-Filho M., Chavez-Andrade G.M., Bosso-Martelo R., Guerreiro-Tanomaru J.M. Evaluation of Physicochemical Properties of a New Calcium Silicate-based Sealer, Bio-C Sealer. J Endod. 2019; 45 (10): 1248-52.

  19. Cavenago B.C., Pereira T.C., Duarte M.A., Ordinola-Zapata R, Marciano MA, Bramante CM, Bernardineli N. Influence of powderto-water ratio on radiopacity, setting time, pH, calcium ion release and a micro-CT volumetric solubility of white mineral trioxide aggregate. Int Endod J. 2014; 47 (2): 120-6.

  20. Fridland M., Rosado R. Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) solubility and porosity with different water-to-powder ratios. J Endod. 2003; 29 (12): 814-7.

  21. Carvalho-Junior J.R., Correr-Sobrinho L., Correr A.B., Sinhoreti M.A., Consani S., Sousa-Neto M.D. Solubility and dimensional change after setting of root canal sealers: a proposal for smaller dimensions of test samples. J Endod. 2007; 33 (9): 1110-6.

  22. Parirokh M., Torabinejad M., Dummer P.M.H. Mineral trioxide aggregate and other bioactive endodontic cements: an updated overview - part I: vital pulp therapy. Int Endod J. 2018; 51.(2):.177-205.

  23. Camilleri J. Characterization of hydration products of mineral trioxide aggregate. Int Endod J. 2008; 41 (5): 408-17.

  24. Jimenez-Sanchez M.D.C., Segura-Egea J.J., Diaz-Cuenca A. Higher hydration performance and bioactive response of the new endodontic bioactive cement MTA HP repair compared with ProRoot MTA white and NeoMTA plus. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2019;107 (6): 2109-20.

  25. Quintana R.M., Jardine A.P., Grechi T.R., Grazziotin-Soares R., Ardenghi D.M., Scarparo R.K., Grecca F.S., Kopper P.M.P. Bone tissue reaction, setting time, solubility, and pH of root repair materials. Clin Oral Investig. 2019; 23 (3): 1359-66.

  26. Dawood A.E., Manton D.J., Parashos P., Wong R., Palamara J., Stanton D.P., Reynolds E.C. The physical properties and ion release of CPP-ACP-modified calcium silicate-based cements. Aust Dent J. 2015; 60 (4): 434-44.

  27. Poggio C., Dagna A., Ceci M., Meravini M.V., Colombo M., Pietrocola G. Solubility and pH of bioceramic root canal sealers: A comparative study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9(10):e1189-e94.

  28. Gandolfi M.G., Siboni F., Prati C. Properties of a novel polysiloxane-guttapercha calcium silicate-bioglass-containing root canal sealer. Dent Mater. 2016; 32 (5): e113-26.

  29. Okabe T., Sakamoto M., Takeuchi H., Matsushima K. Effects of pH on mineralization ability of human dental pulp cells. J Endod. 2006; 32 (3): 198-201.

  30. Candeiro G.T., Correia F.C., Duarte M.A., Ribeiro-Siqueira D.C., Gavini G. Evaluation of radiopacity, pH, release of calcium ions, and flow of a bioceramic root canal sealer. J Endod. 2012; 38 (6): 842-5.

  31. Kaup M., Schafer E., Dammaschke T. An in vitro study of different material properties of Biodentine compared to ProRoot MTA. Head Face Med. 2015;11:16.

  32. Ochoa-Rodriguez V.M., Tanomaru-Filho M., Rodrigues E.M., Guerreiro-Tanomaru J.M., Spin-Neto R., Faria G. Addition of zirconium oxide to Biodentine increases radiopacity and does not alter its physicochemical and biological properties. J Appl Oral Sci. 2019; 27: e20180429.

  33. Padmanabhan P., Das J., Kumari R.V., Pradeep P.R., Kumar A., Agarwal S. Comparative evaluation of apical microleakage in immediate and delayed postspace preparation using four different root canal sealers: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2017; 20 (2): 86-90.

  34. Tanomaru-Filho M., Torres F.F.E., BossoMartelo R., Chavez-Andrade G.M., Bonetti-Filho I., Guerreiro-Tanomaru J.M. A Novel Model for Evaluating the Flow of Endodontic Materials Using Micro-computed Tomography. J Endod. 2017; 43 (5): 796-800.

  35. Gandolfi M.G., Siboni F., Botero T., Bossu M., Riccitiello F., Prati C. Calcium silicate and calcium hydroxide materials for pulp capping: biointeractivity, porosity, solubility and bioactivity of current formulations. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. 2015;13 (1): 43-60.

  36. Elyassi Y., Moinzadeh A.T., Kleverlaan C.J. Characterization of Leachates from 6 Root Canal Sealers. J Endod. 2019; 45 (5): 623-27.

  37. Williamson A.E., Dawson D.V., Drake D.R., Walton R.E., Rivera E.M. Effect of root canal filling/sealer systems on apical endotoxin penetration: a coronal leakage evaluation. J Endod. 2005; 31 (8): 599-604.

  38. Vouzara T., Dimosiari G., Koulaouzidou E.A., Economides N. Cytotoxicity of a New Calcium Silicate Endodontic Sealer. J Endod. 2018; 44 (5): 849-52.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com