medigraphic.com
ISSN 2992-8036 (Electronic)
ISSN 2306-4102 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Colegio Mexicano de Ortopedia y Traumatología

2020, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Acta Ortop Mex 2020; 34 (2)

Anatomical description of the anterior hip approach: safety and effect for total arthroplasty

Diego-Ball D, Cabal AA

Language: Spanish
References: 23
Page: 123-128
PDF size: 193.52 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: The anterior hip approach was described since 1881, since then several studies have been conducted that have shown significant advantages over the posterior and lateral direct approaches of the hip. Material and method: We conducted a descriptive study with continuous non-probabilistic cases at the Institute of Forensic Sciences from October 2015 to July 2017. Anatomy and distances were described to the neurovascular bundles. Correlation of Spearman’s Pearson and Rho was performed. Results: 22 dissections were made, the Femorocutaneous Nerve was identified in 9 specimens, the average lateral Femorocutaneous Nerve distance at Smith-Petersen interval was 11.4 mm, We identified the Ascending Lateral Circumflex artery under the femoral rectum towards the central region of the approach, the separators could be placed around the coxofemoral joint without injuring vital structures, the riskier separator we place it in the anterior wall of the acetabulum, below the Psoasyland with an average distance 28.25 mm to the femoral package. The older you go, the longer the neurovascular bundles were located p ‹ 0.05. Conclusions: High level of safety of the previous approach for hip replacement, distances to vital structures have a reasonable margin, hip replacement offers adequate joint exposure, direct acetabulum vision and atraumatic surgical dissection.


REFERENCES

  1. Matta JM. The anterior approach for total hip replacement, background and operative technique, hip and pelvis institute at Saint John’s Health Center. Santa Mónica, California 2008.

  2. Rachbauer F, Kain M. The history of the anterior approach to the hip. Orthop Clin North Am. 2009; 40(3): 311-20.

  3. Conolly KP, Kamath AF. Direct anterior total hip arthroplasty: Literature review of variations in surgical technique. World J Orthop. 2016; 7(1): 38-43.

  4. Kirkaldy-Willis WH. Isquio-femoral arthrodesis of the hip in tuberculosis. an anterior approach. J Bone Joint Surge. 1950; 32B: 187-92.

  5. Salter RB. Innominate osteotomy in the treatment of congenital dislocation and subluxation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1961; 43-B: 518-39.

  6. Iwata H, Torii S, Hasegawa Y, Itoh H, Mizuno M, Genda E, Kataoka Y. Indications and results of vascularized pedicle iliac bone graft in avascular necrosis of the femoral head. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993: 295: 281-8.

  7. Cubbins WR, Callahan JJ, Scuderi CS. Fractures of the neck of the femur. Surg Gy Obstet. 1939; 68: 87.

  8. Ola Hallert, Yan Li. The direct anterior approach: initial experience of a minimally invasive technique for total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res. 2012; 7: 17.

  9. Restrepo C, Parvizi J. Prospective randomized of two surgical approaches for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2010; 25(5): 671-9.e1.

  10. Putananon C, Tachinda H. Comparison of direct anterior, lateral, posterior and posterior-2 approaches in total hip arthroplasty: network meta-analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018; 28(2): 255-67.

  11. Yao R, Howard JL. Conjoint tendon release in direct anterior total hip arthroplasty: no impact on patient outcomes. Orthopaedics. 2017; 40(6): e971.

  12. Horne PH, Olson SA. Direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty using the fracture table. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2011; 4(3): 139-45.

  13. Mirza AJ, Lombardi AV Jr., Morris MJ, Berend KR. A mini-anterior approach to the hip for total joint replacement: optimising results: improving hip joint replacement outcomes. Bone Joint J. 2014; 96-B(11 Supple A): 32-5.

  14. Sariali E, Leonard P. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty using hueter anterior approach. J Arthroplasty. 2008; 23(2): 266-72.

  15. Yue C, Kang P. Comparison of direct anterior and lateral approaches in total hip arthroplasty. Medicine. 2015; 94(50): e2126.

  16. Chow J, Pearce S, Cho K, Walter W. Direct anterior approach using navigation improves accuracy of cup position compared to conventional posterior approach. Cureus. 2017; 9(7): e1482.

  17. De Steiger RN, Lorimer M. What is the learning curve for anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015; 473(12): 3860-6.

  18. De Geest T, Fennema P. Adverse effects associated with the direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: bayesian meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015; 135(8): 1183-92.

  19. York PJ, Smarck CT. Total hip arthroplasty via anterior approach: tips tricks for primary and revision surgery. Int Orthop. 2016; 40(10): 2041-8.

  20. Ropars M, Morandi X. Anatomical study of the lateral femoral cutaneus nerve with special reference to minimally invasive anterior approach for total hip replacement. Surg Radiol Anat J. 2009; 31(3): 199-204.

  21. Aszmann OC, Dellon ES, Dellon AL. Anatomical course of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve and its susceptibility to compression and injury. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997; 100(3): 600-4.

  22. Bjurlin MA, Davis KE, Allin EF, Ibrahim DT. Anatomic variations in the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve with respect to pediatric hip surgery. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2007; 36: 143-6.

  23. Kain MS, Leunig M. Anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: technique without fracture table, mini-invasive surgery of the hip. Bone Joint J. 2014; 96-B(11 Supple A): 32-5.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com