2020, Number 2
<< Back Next >>
An Med Asoc Med Hosp ABC 2020; 65 (2)
Anatomical variants of the uncinate process found in tomographic studies
Cruz HA, Castillo RR
Language: Spanish
References: 26
Page: 108-113
PDF size: 253.14 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The nasal cavities and paranasal sinuses have a complex anatomy and as a whole constitute a functional unit. Congenital anomalies and anatomical variants of this region are important, either because of their pathological consequences or because they can be a technical difficulty during surgery. Computed tomography has emerged as the method of choice for imaging paranasal sinuses.
Objective: To analyze the anatomical variants of the uncinate process by computed tomography in patients with inflammatory, infectious and tumoral diseases, of nose and paranasal sinuses in a sample of Mexican population.
Material and methods: A retrospective review of all the simple computerized tomographies of the nose and paranasal sinuses of patients in the Specialties Hospital «Dr. Bernardo Sepúlveda» National Medical Center 21st century from January 2016 to January 2017.
Results: 139 patients were obtained from the database, of which 46 computed tomography studies were not found. The most frequent insertion was the middle turbinate with 68 cases (37.7%), with the left side predominating (52.9%). The most frequent pathology was inflammatory presenting in 53 cases (38.12%), predominantly chronic rhinosinusitis with polyps (23.02%)
Conclusions: The most frequent insertion was the middle turbinate, unlike the lamina papyracea described in the international literature. The variation may be due to characteristics such as gender, race and other limitations of the study.
REFERENCES
Arun G, Sanu P, Moideen, Mohan M, Khizer HA, Aparna ST. Anatomical variations in superior attachment of uncinate process and localization of frontal sinus outflow tract. International Journal of Otorhinolaryngology. 2017; 3 (2): 176-179.
Arslan H, Aydinlioğlu A, Bozkurt M, Egeli E. Anatomic variations of the paranasal sinuses: CT examination for endoscopic sinus surgery. Auris Nasus Larynx. 1999; 26: 39-48.
Yánez GC, López AA, Rodríguez IA, Camelli RV, Nurko BB. Variaciones de la anatomía del etmoides. Un estudio clínico radiológico, derechos reservados. An Med Asoc Med Hosp ABC. 2002; 47 (3): 137-141.
Laine FJ, Smoker WR. The ostiomeatal unit and endoscopic surgery: anatomy, variations, and imaging findings in inflammatory diseases. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002; 159: 849-857.
Scribano E, Ascenti G, Loria G, Cascio F, Gaeta M. The role of the ostiomeatal unit anatomic variations in inflammatory disease of the maxillary sinuses. Eur J Radiol. 1997; 24 (3): 172-174.
Iida E, Anzai Y. Imaging of paranasal sinuses and anterior skull base and relevant anatomic variations. Radiol Clin North Am. 2011; 55 (1): 31-52.
Vinay KN, Kamala E, Gugapriya V, Kumari NS. A computerized tomographic study of uncinate process of ethmoid bone. IJAR. 2015; 3 (1): 917-921.
Dasar U, Gokce E. Evaluation of variations in sinonasal region with computed tomography. World J Radiol. 2016; 8 (1): 98-108.
Chinwe OR, Alazigha N. Computed tomography anatomy of the paranasal sinuses and anatomical variants of clinical relevants in Nigerian adults. EJENTAS. 2017; 18: 31-38.
Sumaily I, Aldhabaan S, Hudise J. Anatomical variations of paranasal sinuses gender and age impact. Glob J Oto. 2018; 14 (1): 007-GJO.MS.ID.555877.
Güngör G, Okur N, Okur E. Uncinate process variations and their relationship with ostiomeatal complex: a pictorial essay of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) findings. Pol J Radiol. 2016; 81: 173-180.
Srivastava M, Tyagi S. Role of anatomic variations of uncinate process in frontal sinusitis. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016; 68 (4): 441-444.
Bajaj V, Singh B, Purohit JP. Prevelance of anatomical variations of lateral wall of nose in chronic sinusitis patients. Journal of Evolution of Medical. 2015; 5492-5505.
Mehta A, Puri N. An unusual variation in the anatomy of the uncinate process in external Dacryocystorhinostomy. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2008; 56 (5): 413-416.
Preet TI, Sengupta S, Munjal S, Prasad KS, Chakraborty S. Anatomical variations of uncinate process observed in chronic sinusitis. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013; 65 (2): 157-161.
Stammberger HR, Kennedy DW. Paranasal sinuses: anatomic terminology and nomenclature. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1995; 167: 7-16.
De Grazia KJ, Gonzalo MG, Katherine WJ, Aguirre SV. Prevalencia de variantes anatómicas nasosinusales: importancia en el informe radiológico y en la cirugía endoscópica funcional. Rev Chil Rad. 2014; 20 (1): 5-12.
Cabezón R, Valdés R, Breinbauer H, Ramírez C, Grau C, Iñíguez R. Variantes anatómicas relevantes en tomografía computarizada de cavidades perinasales. Rev Otorrinolaringol Cir Cabeza Cuello. 2010; 70: 223-230.
Silva RR, Parra VD, García FL. Factores pronósticos para cirugía endoscópica funcional en rinusinusitis crónica: Una revisión de la literatura actual. Rev Fac Med. 2011; 19 (2): 232-240.
Al-Swiahb, Jamil N, Al Dousary Surayie H. Computer-aided endoscopic sinus surgery: a retrospective comparative study. Ann Saudi Med. 2010; 20 (2): 149-152.
De Miranda C, De Maranhão C, Arraes F, Padilha I, De Farias L, De Jatobá M et al. Anatomical variations of paranasal sinuses at multislice computed tomography: what to look for. Radiologia Brasileira. 2011; 44 (4): 256-262.
Kumar Irugu Davida Victor, Stammberger Heinz R. A note on the technical aspects and evaluation of the role of navigation system in endoscopic endonasal surgeries. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014; 66 (Suppl. 1): 307-313.
Landsberg R, Friedman M. A computer-assisted anatomical study of the nasofrontal region. Laryngoscope. 2001; 111 (12): 2125-2130.
Flint WP, Haughey BH, Lund VJ, Niparko JK, Robbins TK et al. Cummings otolaryngology head and neck surgery. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby Elsevier; 2010.
Chong V. FESS: The required imaging anatomy. Basal Lamella. 2013; 247 (2): 63-76.
Chong V, Fan YF, Lau D, Sethi DS. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS): What radiologists need to know. Clin Radiol. 1998; 53 (9): 650-658.