medigraphic.com
Órgano de Difusión de la Asociación Académica Panamericana de Medicina Familiar A.C.

2004, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Arch Med Fam 2004; 6 (2)

Diabetic profile in a family practice center in Mexico City

Corona HM, Bautista SL.

Language: Spanish
References: 14
Page: 40-43
PDF size: 60.05 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine the diabetic profile assigned to the Family Practice Center. Design: Descriptive and cross sectional study. Material and methods: 4,518 files were revised with diagnostic of Diabetes Mellitus (DM); were excluded 74 files for incomplete diagnostic. The instrument of data collection consisted on a spreadsheet with the established indicators of the profile. It was applied descriptive statistics. Results: From 4,444 files: 59.9% female; 33% age-group from 61 to 70 years old; 87.4% married; 84.5% complete primary school; 56.6% dedicated to housework; 54.4% less than 10 years of evolution; hyperglycemia 54.9%; nephropathy 8%; neuropathy and retinopathy 3.8%; hypertension 54.4% and obesity 47.1%. Conclusions: The profile indicated predictive family factors like: sedentary, obesity and co-morbidity. More frequently complication: nephropathy. The time of evolution of the DM with prevalence smaller than 10 years is an opportunity that allows to apply preventive strategies, with the vision of improving the quality of life and the medical care costs.


REFERENCES

  1. Velázquez MO, Lara EA, Tusie LMT, González ChA. Prevención primaria de la diabetes: una necesidad para el siglo XXI. Med Int Mex 2001; 17(1): 24-35.

  2. Committee Report of the Expertise on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care Suppl 2002; 25(1): S5-S20.

  3. Mancillas AL, Gómez PF, Rull RJ. Diagnóstico y clasificación de la diabetes mellitus, conceptos actuales. Rev Endocrinol Nutr 2002; 10(2): 63-68.

  4. Islas AS. Diabetes Mellitus. México: McGraw-Hill Interamericana, 1999.

  5. Mateos SN, Zacarías CR. Tratamiento farmacológico para la diabetes mellitus. Rev Hosp Gral Dr. M Gea González 2002; 5(12): 33-41.

  6. López CJ, Ariza AC, Rodríguez MJ, Munguía MC. Construcción y validación inicial de un instrumento para medir el estilo de vida en pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 2. Rev Salud Pública de México 2003; 45(4): 2 59-267.

  7. González MF, León PI. Perspectivas en el tratamiento de la diabetes mellitus. Rev Med Hosp Gen Mex 2002; 65(3): 173-177.

  8. Bouma M, Dekker JH, Van Eijk J, Shellevis FG, Kriegsman D, Heine RJ. Metabolic control and morbidity of type 2 diabetic patients in a general practice network. Family Practice 1999; 16 (4): 402-406.

  9. Madrazo NM, Zárate AA, Castro RM, Alpízar SM. Programa institucional para la vigilancia, prevención y control de la diabetes mellitus. Bol Salud Comunitaria 2000; IV(2): 32-38.

  10. Alpízar SM, Sotomayor GA, Castro RM, Zárate AA, Madrazo NM. Acciones anticipadas ante diabetes mellitus. Rev Med IMSS 1998; 36(1): 3-5.

  11. Reporte del Área de Informática Médica y Archivo Clínico de la UMF 94 (ARIMAC).

  12. Torres VA, Zacarías CR. Nefropatía diabética. Rev Hosp M Gea Glz 2002; 5(1-2): 24-32.

  13. Conde FA, Paredes FC, Zacarías CR. Neuropatía diabética. Rev Hosp M Gea Glz 2001; 4(1-2): 6-13.

  14. Alpízar SM, Pizaña BJ, Zárate AA. La diabetes mellitus en el adulto mayor. Rev Med IMSS 1999; 37(2): 117-125.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com