medigraphic.com
ISSN 2992-8036 (Electronic)
ISSN 2306-4102 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Colegio Mexicano de Ortopedia y Traumatología

2004, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Acta Ortop Mex 2004; 18 (3)

Clinic and radiographic comparison of the reaming and not reaming acetabular in hemiarthroplasty of hip

Reyna OG, Harb PEJ

Language: Spanish
References: 20
Page: 96-99
PDF size: 41.24 Kb.


ABSTRACT

In Mexico about 20,000 fractures of hip exist to the year, of which a high percentage is solved for hemiarthroplasty of hip. Objective. To compare clinic and radiographic the reaming and not reaming acetabular in this type of surgery. Material and methods. There were studied all the patients in whom they realized of hemiarthroplasty hip among January from 1987 until December from 1996, meeting a whole of 66 patients, of whom reamed the acetabulum in 25 and unreamed in 41. Results. There was no significant difference in the clinic (Harris) not in the radiographies (Sotelo-Garza and Charnley) nor at of six weeks, six months, one year, two and three years (p = 0.06). The average of the qualifications of the test of Harris improved in the course of time in both groups. The results in accordance with the location of fracture showed that between more proximal it was the fracture , better were the results in both groups. Discussion. These results turn out to be excellent, since patients were included only with appropriate indication and good surgical skill, knowingly that the principal objective was to evaluate the pain and the erosion acetabular caused by the implant.


REFERENCES

  1. Aufranc OE, Edwards JW. Instructional course, Lectures II: 163 Ann Arbor, Am. Acad. Orthop Surg 1954.

  2. Cook S, Thomas KA, Kester MA: Wear characteristics of the canine acetabulum against different femoral prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg 1989; 71-(2): 187-197.

  3. Cruess RL, Kwok DC, Due PN, Lecavalier MA, Dang GT: The response of articular cartilage to weight bearing against metal. A study of hemiarthroplasty of the hip in the dog. J Bone Joint Surg 1984; 66-(4): 592-597.

  4. Dalldorf PG, Banas MP, Hicks DG, Pellegrini VD Jr. : Rate of degeneration of human acetabular cartilage after hemiarthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 1995; 77(6)-:877-882.

  5. D’Arcy J, Devas M: Treatment of fractures of the femoral neck by replacement with the Thompson prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg 1976; 58-(3): 279-286.

  6. Eiskjaer S, Ostgard SE: Survivorship analysis of hemiarthroplasties. Clinic Orthop 1993; (286): 206-211.

  7. Harris WH: Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg 1969; 51(4): 737-755.

  8. Johnston CE, Ripley LP, Bray CB, Shaffer LW, Strong TEH, Henning GD, Pruner RA: Primary endoprosthetic replacement for acute femoral neck fractures. A Review of 150 cases. Clinic Orthop 1982; (167): 123-130.

  9. Kaltsas DC, Klugman DJ: Acetabular erosion: A comparison between the Austin-Moore and Monk hard top prosthesis. Injury 1986; 17(4): 230-236.

  10. Kobayashi A, Donelly WJ, Scott G, Freeman MAR: Early radiological observations may predict the long-term survival of femoral hip prostheses. J Bone and Joint Surg 1997; 79(4)-B: 583-589.

  11. Kofoed H, Kofod J: Moore prosthesis in the treatment of fresh femoral neck fractures. A critical review with special attention to secondary acetabular degeneration. Injury 1983; 14(6): 531-540.

  12. Lazcano MA: Hemiartroplastía de cadera tipo Lazcano para fracturas intertrocantéricas. Ciencia y cultura latinoamericana, México DF, 1998.

  13. Marjolein CH, Allen WA: Effect of hemiarthroplasty on acetabular cartilage, Rehabilitation center progress, 1996.

  14. Moore AT: The self-locking metal hip prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg 1957; 39(4)-A: 811-827.

  15. Sauri JC, Lazcano MA: Hemiartroplastía de cadera integral Lazcano de 2 a 6 años de evolución. Informe de 49 operaciones. Rev Mex Ortop Traum 1999; 13(6): 523-525.

  16. Sotelo-Garza A, Charnley J: The results of Charnley arthroplasty of the hip performance for protrusion acetabuli. Clinic Orthop 1978; (132): 12-18.

  17. Thompson FR: Two and a half years, experience with a vitallium intramedullary hip prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg 1954; 36-(3): 489-500.

  18. Nottage WM, McMaster WC: Comparison of bipolar implants with fixed-neck prostheses in femoral-neck fractures. Clinic Orthop 1990; (251): 38.

  19. Koval KJ, Aharonoff GB, Rosenberg AD, Bernstein Rl, Zuckerman JD: Functional Outcome after hip fracture. Effect of general versus regional anesthesia. Clin Orthop 1998; (348):37-41

  20. Koval KJ, Shorron ML, Aharonoff GB, Zuckerman JD: Predictors of functional recovery after hip fracture in the elderly. Clinic Orthop 1998; 348: 22-28.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com