medigraphic.com
ISSN 2500-7106 (Electronic)
ISSN 0123-2576 (Print)
Medicina & Laboratorio

2013, Number 11-12

<< Back Next >>

Medicina & Laboratorio 2013; 19 (11-12)

Diagnostic imaging in breast pathology

Ossa GCA

Language: Spanish
References: 26
Page: 549-566
PDF size: 1015.71 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Breast imaging diagnostic have become an indispensable tool for the specialist in breast disease. Currently, the diagnostic tools are: mammography, breast ultrasound and magnetic resonance; but they are under study new technologies such as elastography and tomosynthesis (3D digital mammography). This article presented the most important elements in these diagnostic tools, terminology used in reports and indications for each of these techniques.


REFERENCES

  1. Jackson VP. Diagnostic mammography. Radiol Clin North Am 2004; 42: 853-870, vi.

  2. Goddi A, Bonardi M, Alessi S. Breast elastography: A literature review. J Ultrasound 2012; 15: 192-198.

  3. Stavros AT. Ecografía de Mama. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2006.

  4. Pedraza AM, Pollan M, Pastor-Barriuso R, Cabanes A. Disparities in breast cancer mortality trends in a middle income country. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012; 134: 1199-1207.

  5. Grupo Vigilancia Epidemiológica del Cáncer I. Mortalidad por cáncer según primeras causas y sexo, Colombia 2000-2011. Vol. 2013: Instituto Nacional de Cancerología.

  6. Salomon A. Beitrage zur Pathologie und Klinik der Mammacarcinome Arch Klin Chir 1913; 101: 573- 668.

  7. Leborgne R. Diagnosis of tumors of the breast by simple roentgenography; calcifications in carcinomas. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther 1951; 65: 1-11.

  8. Leborgne R. The breast in roentgen diagnosis. Montevideo, Uruguay: Impresora Uruguaya S. A; 1953.

  9. Shapiro S. Periodic screening for breast cancer: the HIP Randomized Controlled Trial. Health Insurance Plan. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1997: 27-30.

  10. Tabar L, Vitak B, Chen TH, Yen AM, Cohen A, Tot T, et al. Swedish two-county trial: impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality during 3 decades. Radiology 2011; 260: 658-663.

  11. Yaffe MJ, Mainprize JG. Risk of radiation-induced breast cancer from mammographic screening. Radiology 2011; 258: 98-105.

  12. Liberman L, Menell JH. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). Radiol Clin North Am 2002; 40: 409-430, v.

  13. Boyd NF, Byng JW, Jong RA, Fishell EK, Little LE, Miller AB, et al. Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995; 87: 670-675.

  14. Poveda CA. Sistema Birads: Descifrando El Informe Mamográfico. Repert med cir 2010; 19: 18-27.

  15. Sedgwick E. The breast ultrasound lexicon: breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). Semin Roentgenol 2011; 46: 245-251.

  16. Orel SG, Schnall MD. MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology 2001; 220: 13-30.

  17. Surgeons ASoB. Position Statement of the use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Surgical Oncology. Vol. 19 de agosto, 2013.

  18. Warner E, Plewes DB, Hill KA, Causer PA, Zubovits JT, Jong RA, et al. Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination. JAMA 2004; 292: 1317-1325.

  19. Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C, Besnard PE, Zonderland HM, Obdeijn IM, et al. Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 427-437.

  20. Hata T, Takahashi H, Watanabe K, Takahashi M, Taguchi K, Itoh T, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of breast cancer: a comparative study with mammography and ultrasonography. J Am Coll Surg 2004; 198: 190-197.

  21. Lord SJ, Lei W, Craft P, Cawson JN, Morris I, Walleser S, et al. A systematic review of the effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as an addition to mammography and ultrasound in screening young women at high risk of breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 2007; 43: 1905-1917.

  22. Ophir J, Cespedes I, Ponnekanti H, Yazdi Y, Li X. Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrason Imaging 1991; 13: 111-134.

  23. Wojcinski S, Boehme E, Farrokh A, Soergel P, Degenhardt F, Hillemanns P. Ultrasound real-time elastography can predict malignancy in BI-RADS(R)-US 3 lesions. BMC Cancer 2013; 13: 159.

  24. Michell MJ, Iqbal A, Wasan RK, Evans DR, Peacock C, Lawinski CP, et al. A comparison of the accuracy of film-screen mammography, full-field digital mammography, and digital breast tomosynthesis. Clin Radiol 2012; 67: 976-981.

  25. Skaane P, Gullien R, Bjorndal H, Eben EB, Ekseth U, Haakenaasen U, et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): initial experience in a clinical setting. Acta Radiol 2012; 53: 524-529.

  26. Houssami N, Skaane P. Overview of the evidence on digital breast tomosynthesis in breast cancer detection. Breast 2013; 22: 101-108.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com