medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-2902 (Electronic)

2019, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Revista Cubana de Educación Médica Superior 2019; 33 (2)

Augmented reality for the learning of Phonoaudiology students from University of Playa Ancha

Agudelo VMF, González CJA

Language: Spanish
References: 22
Page: 1-16
PDF size: 575.63 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: The present study addresses the use of the digital tool Augmented Reality as a resource for the application of learning methodologies in correspondence with an innovative curriculum in the area of health.
Objective: To describe the perception of the Phonoaudiology students from University of Playa Ancha, during the second semester of 2017, regarding the contribution to the development of the competences declared in the curricular activity “Procesos Generales de Fonoaudiología” [General Processes of Phonoaudiology], using the digital tool Augmented Reality as an innovative methodology.
Methods: Study framed within the positivist paradigm, through the use of quantitative descriptive techniques. The design was non-experimental and cross-sectional, in which the information was collected through a perception survey prepared for this purpose and with all the desired psychometric characteristics. The information collected was subjected to analysis through the statistical program R, particularly R Commander.
Results: Based on the factorial analysis of the instrument, three dimensions were established, which were used to determine the orientation of the students' perception regarding the methodology used. It was appreciated that students who had a comprehensive or composite orientation concentrated mainly on the categories of perception Good and Very good, which represented more than 50% of the sample.
Conclusions: According to the students' perception, the use of Augmented Reality led to the development of the competences of the course, which contributed to the development of the profile of a committed professional.


REFERENCES

  1. Gazzola AL, Tendencias de la educación superior en América Latina y el Caribe. 2018. 2da. ed.Editor Didriksson, Axel. Instituto Internacional de la UNESCO para la Educación Superior en AméricaLatina y el Caribe© IESALC-UNESCO, Caracas, Venezuela.

  2. Lai KW, Hong KS. Technology use and learning characteristics of students in higher education: Do generational differences exist? British Journal of Educational Technology. 2015;46(4):725-38.

  3. Tünnermann Bernheim C. La educación superior en América Latina y el Caribe diez años después de la Conferencia Mundial de 1998. Calí, Colombia:Instituto Internacional para la Educación Superior en América Latina y el Caribe;2018. Disponible en: http://beu.extension.unicen.edu.ar/xmlui/handle/123456789/310

  4. Fonseca Escudero D, Redondo Domínguez E, Valls Dalmau F. Motivación y mejora académica utilizando realidad aumentada para el estudio de modelos tridimensionales arquitectónicos. Education in the knowledge society (EKS). 2016;17(1):45-64

  5. De la Fuente Arias J, Martínez MMV, Cardelle-Elawar M. Aportaciones de la Psicología de la Innovación y del Emprendimiento a la Educación, en la Sociedad del Conocimiento. Electronic Journal of Research in Education Psychology. 2018;10(28):944.

  6. López MAQ. Entramado teórico fenomenológico inherente con las habilidades en el aprendizaje de las TIC en la educación universitaria. SATHIRI: Sembrador. 2018;12(2):156-69.

  7. Dominici P. For an inclusive innovation. Healing the fracture between the human and the technological in the hypercomplex society. European Journal of Futures Research. 2018;6(1):3.

  8. Edirippulige S, Smith AC, Wickramasinghe S, Armfield NR. Examining the Influence of E-Health Education on Professional Practice. Journal of medical systems. 2018;42(11):215.

  9. Picatoste J, Pérez-Ortiz L, Ruesga-Benito SM. A new educational pattern in response to new technologies and sustainable development. Enlightening ICT skills for youth employability in the European Union. Telematics and Informatics. 2018;35(4):1031-8.

  10. Kilis S, Yıldırım Z. Investigation of community of inquiry framework in regard to self-regulation, metacognition and motivation. Computers & Education. 2018;126:53-64.

  11. Hamidi H, Chavoshi A. Social, Individual, Technological and Pedagogical Factors Influencing Mobile Learning Acceptance in Higher Education: A Case from Iran. Telematics and Informatics. 2018.

  12. Mikkonen K, Ojala T, Sjögren T, Piirainen A, Koskinen C, Koskinen M, et al. Competence areas of health science teachers-A systematic review of quantitative studies. Nurse education today. 2018.

  13. Abud MA. Modelo de Objetos de Aprendizaje con realidad aumentada. Revista Internacional de la Educación en Ingeniería. 2012;5(1):1-7.

  14. Martín-Gutiérrez J, Fabiani P, Benesova W, Meneses MD, Mora CE. Augmented reality to promote collaborative and autonomous learning in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior. 2015;51:752-61.

  15. Akçayır M, Akçayır G. Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review. 2017;20:1-11.

  16. González Campos J, Carvajal Muquillaza C, Viveros Reyes F. Coeficientes edumétricos para la validez y dificultad de un test: Propuesta. Estudios pedagógicos (Valdivia). 2016;42(3):467-81.

  17. Gutiérrez RC, de Moya Martínez MdV, Bravo JAH, Bravo JRH. Tecnologías emergentes para la enseñanza de las Ciencias Sociales.: Una experiencia con el uso de Realidad Aumentada en la formación inicial de maestros. Digital Education Review. 2015(27):138-53.

  18. Martínez-Pérez I, Morales-Segura M. Recorridos interactivos de realidad aumentada como nueva herramienta multimedia en la enseñanza de asignaturas de Construcción Arquitectónica = Interactive augmented reality tours as a new multimedia tool in the teaching of Architectural Construction subjects. Advances in Building Education. 2018;2(1):31-50.

  19. Redondo E, Fonseca D, Valls F, Olivares A. Enseñanza basada en dispositivos móviles. Nuevos retos en la docencia de la representación arquitectónica. Caso de estudio: Los Tianguis de Tonalá, Jalisco, México. EGA Expresión Gráfica Arquitectónica. 2016;21(27):64-73.

  20. Cabero-Almenara J, Vázquez-Cano E, López-Meneses E. Uso de la Realidad Aumentada como Recurso Didáctico en la Enseñanza Universitaria. Formación universitaria. 2018;11(1):25-34.

  21. Pulido RDB. Incidencia de la realidad aumentada sobre el estilo cognitivo: caso para el estudio de las matemáticas. Educación y educadores. 2015;18(1):7.

  22. Cabero Almenara J, Fernández Robles B, Marín Díaz V. Dispositivos móviles y realidad aumentada en el aprendizaje del alumnado universitario. RIED Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia. 2017;20(2):167-85.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com