medigraphic.com
ISSN 1727-897X (Electronic)

2019, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Medisur 2019; 17 (4)

Laryngeal mask, alternative in the oxygenation apneica during simpatectomía thoracic. Case Presentation

Benalcázar VDE, Ojeda GJJ, Ojeda DL

Language: Spanish
References: 11
Page: 598-603
PDF size: 202.43 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The case of a 15 year-year-old female patient is presented, attended at the Children's Hospital of Cienfuegos, who reported that since childhood has diaphoresis (profuse sweating) on her body and very noticeable hands and armpits, which prevents proper perfomance in public and the inability to write on paper without it getting wet. He was diagnosed with hyperhidrosis and it was decided to perform video-laparoscopic surgery for thoracic sympathectomy. General anesthesia was used; a laryngeal mask and apneic oxygenation were used to permeabilize the airway, with which hemodynamic stability was achieved. The patient did not present complications and a definitive solution of hyperhidrosis was achieved.


REFERENCES

  1. Moya Amorós J, Ferrer Recuero G, Peyri J, Pujol Tovira R, Morera Abad R, Torrado Castellarnau X, Villalonga Badell R. Thoracic endoscopic sympathectomy for the treatment of the primary palmar hiperhidrosis. A report of 28 cases. Actas Dermosifliograf. 2000 ; 91: 43-6.

  2. Eschertzhuber S, Brimacombe J, Hohtrieder M, Keller C. The laryngeal mask airway supreme a single use laryngeal mask air way with on oesopahageal vent. A randomized, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients. Anaesthesia. 2009 ; 64: 79-83.

  3. Seet E, Rajeev S, Firoz T. Safety and efficacy of laryngeal mask airway Supreme versus laryngeal Mask airwey ProSeal: a radomized controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesid. 2010 ; 27: 602-7.

  4. Rodríguez Ramírez C, Bermúdez Bermúdez SM, Cordero Escobar I, Alba Abela Lazo A. Máscara laríngea I Gel vs ProSeal en cirugía oncológica de mama. Rev Cubana Anestesiol Reanim. 2014 ; 13 (1): 15-30.

  5. García Fernández J. Peculiaridades del empleo de la mascarilla laríngea en el paciente pediátrico [Internet]. Madrid: Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro; 2015. [ cited 4 Abr 2018 ] Available from: http://www.ventilacionanestesiapediatrica.com/si te/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogcat egory&id=32&Itemid=53.

  6. Mesa González M, López Cruz O. Máscara laríngea Proseal vs intubación endotraqueal en cirugía laparoscópica. Invest Medicoquir. 2011 ; 3 (1): 1-7.

  7. Agüero Martínez MO, Redondo Gómez Z, Cordoví de Armas L, Gutiérrez Rojas A. Máscara laríngea vs tubo endotraqueal en intervenciones quirúrgicas de duración prolongada. Ensayo clínico. Rev Argent Anestesiol. 2005 ; 63 (3): 139-49.

  8. Galeiras Vázquez ME, Ferreiro Velasco M, Mourelo Fariña A, Montoto Marqués A. Actualización en lesión medular aguda postraumática. Parte 1. Med Intensiva. 2017 ; 41: 237-47.

  9. Suppan MR, Tramèr M, Niquille O. Alternative intubation techniques vs Macintosh laryngoscopy in patients with cervical spine immobilization: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Br J Anaesth. 2016 ; 116: 27-36.

  10. Qureshi MJ, Kumar M. Vía aérea con mascarilla laríngea versus ventilación con bolsa y mascarilla o intubación endotraqueal para la reanimación neonatal [Internet]. London: COCHRANE; 2016. [ cited 5 May 2018 ] Available from: https://www.cochrane.org/es/CD003314/aerea-co n-mascarilla-laringea-versus-ventilacion-con-bols a-y-mascarilla-o-intubacion-endotraquea.

  11. Coloma R, Álvarez JP. Manejo avanzado de la vía aérea. REV MED CLIN CONDES. 2011 ; 22 (3): 270-9.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com