medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-3062 (Electronic)

2019, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Revista Cubana de Obstetricia y Ginecología 2019; 45 (3)

Correlation of diagnostic methods results of cervical pathologies at

Gómez MD, González BM, González PSF, Quintana GO

Language: Spanish
References: 25
Page:
PDF size: 391.26 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Cervical cancer is the second most common neoplasm in women in the world. Good correlation between screening tests, diagnosis and treatment of cervical lesions optimizes management, avoiding unnecessary procedures and maximizing available resources.
Objective: To identify the relationship between the diagnostic methods of cervical pathologies.
Methods: An observational, descriptive, cross-sectional and prospective study was conducted at Camilo Cienfuegos Provincial Hospital in Sancti Spíritus, from September 2015 to September 2017. A population of 1172 patients was taken from the cervical pathology clinic according to the research criteria. The scientific methods were theoretical, empirical-experimental and mathematical-statistical. The assumed variables were age, associated risk factors, symptomatology, cytology, colposcopy and biopsy.
Results: The age group that most frequently appeared was ages between 26 and 35 years. The main associated risk factors were age of first sexual intercourse before 18 years old, human papillomavirus, parity of more than two children and family history of some cervix pathology. The outstanding symptomatology was postcoital and intermenstrual bleeding. The results of the diagnostic methods were human papillomavirus and mild dysplasia, both in cytology and biopsy, and low-grade colposcopy lesions.
Conclusions: The association between the diagnostic methods studied showed good cytocolposcopic and colpohistological correlation, with confirmation diagnosis mainly in cases of high-grade lesions.


REFERENCES

  1. Cortessis VK, Barrett M, Brown Wade N, Enebish T, Perrigo JL, et al. McKean-Cowdin R. Intrauterine Device Use and Cervical Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov 3.

  2. Arzuaga-Salazar MA, de Souza ML, de Azevedo Lima VL. El cáncer de cuello de útero: un problema social mundial. Rev Cubana Enfermer [en línea]. 2012 Mar [citado 20/12/2013];28(1). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?pid=S0864-03192012000100007&script=sci_arttext

  3. Cuba. Dirección Nacional de Estadísticas. Anuario estadístico de salud 2015 (ed. 2016). La Habana: Ecimed; 2015.

  4. Ramil Valdés JD, Nieto Lluis M, Jorge Pérez ER, Sanabria Negrín J, Lence Anta JJ, et al. Programa Nacional de diagnóstico precoz del cáncer cérvico uterino. La Habana: Ciencias Médicas; 2001. [citado 08/01/2013]. Disponible en: http://www.sld.cu/galerias/pdf/sitios/dne/informacion_estadistica_del_programa_de_cancer_cerv-ute.pdf

  5. de la Torre Rendón FE. Lesión pre maligna escamosa del cuello uterino, un enfoque actualizado. Patología [en línea]. 2008 [citado 08/01/2013];46(4). Disponible en: http://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/patrevlat/rlp-2008/rlp084g.pdf

  6. Sarduy Nápoles M. Correlación citohistológica en las neoplasias intraepiteliales cervicales y en la identificación del VPH en esas lesiones. Rev. Cubana Obstet Ginecol [en línea]. 2009 Mar [citado 08/01/2014];35(1). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0138-600X2009000100007

  7. Akhter S, Bari A, Hayat Z. Variability study between Pap smear, Colposcopy and Cervical Histopathology findings. J Pak Med Assoc. 2015;65(12):1295-9.

  8. Kaban I, Cengiz H, Kaban A, Yildiz S, Ekin M, Avci E. Agreement between colposcopy results using the Reid Colposcopic Index and histopathology. Ginekol Pol. 2015;86(7):537-40.

  9. Li Y, Zhang H, Zheng R, Xie F, Sui L. Agreement between colposcopic diagnosis with 2011 international terminology of colposcopy and cervical pathology in cervical lesions. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2015;50(5):361-6.

  10. Tatiyachonwiphut M, Jaishuen A, Sangkarat S, Laiwejpithaya S, Wongtiraporn W, Inthasorn P, et al. Agreement between colposcopic diagnosis and cervical pathology: Siriraj hospital experience. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(1):423-6.

  11. Zaal A, Louwers JA, Berkhof J, Kocken M, Ter Harmsel WA, Graziosi GC, et al. Agreement between colposcopic impression and histological diagnosis among human papillomavirus type 16-positive women: a clinical trial using dynamic spectral imaging colposcopy. BJOG. 2012;119(5):537-44.

  12. Friedrich H. Citodiagnóstico ginecológico. Madrid-España: Editorial Panamericana, S.A.; 2005.

  13. Echemendía Pérez M. Ginecología oncológica pelviana. La Habana: Editorial Ciencias Médicas; 2006.

  14. Patel A, Galaal K, Burnley C, Faulkner K, Martin-Hirsch P, Bland MJ, et al. Cervical cancer incidence in young women: a historical and geographic controlled UK regional population study. Br J Cancer [en línea]. 2012 [citado 19/11/2015];106(11):[aprox. 10 p.]. Disponible en: http://www.nature.com/bjc/journal/v106/n11/abs/bjc2012148a.html

  15. Chelimo C, Wouldes TA, Cameron LD, El-wood JM. Risk factors for and prevention of human papillomaviruses (HPV), genital warts and cervical cancer. J Infect. 2013 Mar;66(3):207-17.

  16. Jamshidi M, Shekari M, Nejatizadeh AA, Ma-lekzadeh K, Baghershiroodi M, Davudian P, et al. The impact of human papillomavirus (HPV) types 6, 11 in women with genital warts. Arch Gynecol Obstet [en línea]. 2012 [citado 09/11/2015];286(5):[aprox. 7 p.]. Disponible en: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00404-012-2416-1#/page-1

  17. González MJ, González B, Biete SA. Ginecología Oncológica. 3 ed, Madrid: Menéndez Editores; 2000. p. 141.

  18. Zhang X, Zhang L, Tian C, Yang L, Wang Z. Genetic variants and risk of cervical cancer: epidemiological evidence, meta-analysis and research review. BJOG. 2014;121(6):664-74.

  19. Vaccarella S, Lortet-Tieulent J, Plummer M, Franceschi S, Bray F. Worldwide trends in cervical cancer incidence: impact of screening against changes in disease risk factors. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(15):3262-73.

  20. Klügel S, Lücke C, Meta A, Schild-Suhren M, Malik E, Philipsen A, et al. Concomitant psychiatric symptoms and impaired quality of life in women with cervical cancer: a critical review. Int J Womens Health. 2017;30;9:795-805.

  21. Di J, Rutherford S, Chu C. Review of the Cervical Cancer Burden and Population-Based Cervical Cancer Screening in China. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(17):7401-7.

  22. Peirson L, Fitzpatrick-Lewis D, Ciliska D, Warren R. Screening for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2013;24;2:35.

  23. Abolafia Cañete B, Monserrat Jordán JA, Cuevas Cruces J, Arjona Berral JE. Diagnóstico precoz del cáncer de cérvix: correlación entre citología, colposcopia y biopsia. Rev Esp Patol. 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.patol.2017.07.002

  24. Correia Katz LM, Rolland Souza AS, Oliveira Fittipaldi S, de Melo Santos G, Ramos Amorim MM. Concordancia entre citologia, colposcopia e histopatologia cervical. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2010;32(8):368-73.

  25. Sánchez Nava MF, Olivares Montano AK, Contreras Carreto NA, Díaz Suárez MM. Certeza diagnóstica de la colposcopia, citología e histología de las lesiones intraepiteliales del cérvix. Rev Invest Med Sur Mex. 2013;20(2):95-9.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com