medigraphic.com
ISSN 1870-199X (Print)
Órgano oficial de la Facultad de Odontología, UNAM

2006, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Odont Mex 2006; 10 (2)

In vitro study of the sealing degree of obturation materials in primary molars with pulpotomy

Dittel BAM, Garrocho RJA, Méndez GMV, Hernández SJF, Pozos GAJ

Language: Spanish
References: 14
Page: 83-87
PDF size: 171.55 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to compare the marginal leakage of three commercially available products when used as temporary restorations after pulpotomy in human primary molars. An in vitro study was carried out; 51 primary molars were divided into 3 groups of 17 molars; all teeth received pulpotomy treatment, after which the temporary material was placed in the pulp chamber space: A. Glass ionomer cement. B. CAVIT. C. IRM. We evaluated the marginal leakage by polarized light microscope. Results showed that there was a statistically significant difference among groups (p ‹ 0.05); glass ionomer cement showed significantly more leakage than other materials; indicating that there are microleakage causing failure of the treatment. CAVIT and IRM were similar in their sealing properties.


REFERENCES

  1. Guelmann M, Fair J, Turner C, Courts FJ. The success of emergency pulpotomies in primary molars. Pediatr Dent 2002; 24: 217-220.

  2. Deveaux E, Hildelbert P, Neut C, Boniface B, Romond C. Bacterial microleakage of Cavit, IRM, and TERM. Oral Surg, Oral Med, Oral Pathol 1992; 74: 634-643.

  3. Salama FS, Riad MI, Abdel Megid FY. Microleakage and marginal gap formation of glass ionomer resin restorations. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1995; 20: 31-36.

  4. Pashley DH. Clinical considerations of microleakage. J Endod 1990; 16: 70-77.

  5. Turgut MD, Tekcicek MU, Attar N, Sargon MF. Microleakage of two polyacid-modified resin composites under different conditioning methods in primary teeth. ASDC J Dent Child 2001; 68: 311-315.

  6. Ekman JO, Handelman SL. In vitro assessment of marginal leakage of six enamel sealants. J Prosthet Dent 1978; 39: 304-306.

  7. Kazuo E. Morphological and microleakage studies of the cavities prepared by Er:YAG Laser Irradiation in Primary Teeth. J Clin Laser Med Surg 2002; 20: 141-147.

  8. Atash R, Bottenberg P, Petein M, Vanden AA. In vitro evaluation of the marginal seal of four restoration materials on deciduous molars. Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol 2003; 45: 34-41.

  9. Kazemi RB, Safavy KE, Spangberg LS. Assessment of marginal and permeability of an interim restorative endodontic material. Oral Surg, Oral Med, Oral Pathol 1994; 78: 788-796.

  10. Browner WS, Black D, Newman TB, Hulley SB. Estimating sample size and power. In: Hulley SB, Cummings SR. Designing clinical research: An epidemiologic approach. Eds. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1998: 139-150.

  11. Latour J, Baraira V, Cabello JB, López J. Las mediciones clínicas en cardiología: validez y errores de medición. Rev Esp Cardiol 1997; 50: 117-128.

  12. Lim KC. Microleakage of intermediate restorative materials. J Endod 1990; 16: 116-118.

  13. Parris L, Kapsimalis P. The effect of temperature change on the sealing properties of temporary filling materials. Oral Surg, Oral Med, Oral Pathol 1960; 13: 982-989.

  14. Barkhordar RA, Stark MM. Sealing ability of intermediate restorations and cavity design used in endodontics. Oral Surg, Oral Med, Oral Pathol 1990; 69: 99-101.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com