medigraphic.com
ISSN 1028-4818 (Electronic)

2019, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Mul Med 2019; 23 (3)

Minimum Access Surgery in Surgical Reinterventions: Comparative Study

Ramos SAE, Ramos SRH, Vargas LFA, Neyra RCM, Rosabal EJE, Gallardo ARL

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 460-473
PDF size: 259.34 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Despite the development reached in the endoscopic era, there are skeptics to the practice of reoperations due to minimal access surgery (MAS). In order to evaluate the outcome of the minimally invasive surgery in the reinterventions, a comparative, prospective, quasi-experimental study was performed in patients reoperated by conventional surgery (N = 64) and minimal access surgery (N = 32). , attended at the Provincial Teaching Surgical Clinical Hospital "Celia Sánchez Manduley" of Manzanillo, Cuba between 2013 and 2017. The evolution time for both series was similar, with 60% of patients in the first three days. The coleperitoneum (28.1%) and the hemothorax (28.1%) were the most represented conditions in the endoscopic cases, with aspiration and lavage being performed. 66.7% of the cases reoperated by MAS were initially treated by open surgery. a favorable evolution in 94.4%. The average surgical time was lower in the endoscopic series (70.8 min), (conventional surgery 89.8 min), 2 patients were converted to RR 3.54. The arithmetic mean of the hospital stay in the endoscopic series was 4.9 days, and 10.1 in the conventional series. In the endoscopic series, feeding was started early (5.1 hours), and labor reincorporation occurred at 17.6 days. The minimal access surgery allowed patients of all ages to safely undergo surgery, applying the same surgical techniques, with a surgical time slightly inferior to conventional surgery, hospital expenses were reduced due to the stay and early incorporation into social activities and productive.


REFERENCES

  1. Castro Pérez R, Acosta González LR, Dopico Reyes E, Delgado Fernández JC, Robaina Arias LE, Oriolo Estrada M. El abordaje transvaginal en la apendicitis aguda. Cir Esp 2011; 89(8): 517-23.

  2. Kim HJ, Lee JL, Lee YS, Lee IK, Park JH, Lee SK, et al. Single – port transumbilical laparoscopic appendectomy: 43 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc. 2010; 24(11): 2765–9.

  3. Korndorffer JR, Fellinger E, Reed W. SAGES guideline for laparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Endosc 2010; 24(4): 757-761.

  4. Ramos Socarrás AE, Álvarez Pérez AC, Lorenzo Mestril A, Vallés Gamboa ME, Gallardo Arzuaga RL. Factores determinantes de las conversiones en la colecistectomía laparoscópica. CCM 2014; 18(4): 611-622.

  5. Zhang WW, Xie XJ, Geng CX, Zhan SH. Rare case of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in achalasia. World J Clin Cases 2015; 3(3): 327-9.

  6. Zonča P, Ihnát P, Peteja M. Acute abdominal surgery in pregnancy - as viewed by the surgeon. Rozhl Chir 2015; 94(6): 229-33.

  7. Ministerio de Salud Pública. Anuario Estadístico de Salud 2015. [Internet]. La Habana: ECIMED; 2016 [citado 25/8/2018]. Disponible en: http://files.sld.cu/dne/files/2016/04/Anuario_2015_electronico-1.pdf

  8. Zakaria OM, Hokkam EN, Elsayem K, Daoud MY, Alwadaani HA, Al Mulhim AS, et al. Different surgical modalities in management of paediatric abdominal lymphoma. Gulf J Oncolog 2013; 1(14): 14-9.

  9. Peña Pupo NE. Cirugía videolaparoscópica en el abdomen agudo peritoneal: diseño y aplicación de un protocolo de actuación. [Tesis] Cuba: Hospital Universitario Lucía Íñigues Landín; 2010 [citado 5/9/2018]. Disponible en: tesis.repo.sld.cu/354/

  10. Toledo AE, Shapiro LS, Farrell JF, Magro CM, Polito J. Laparoscopy shows superiority over endoscopy for early detection of malignant atrophic papulosis gastrointestinal complications: a case report and review of literature. BMC Gastroenterol 2015; 15: 156.

  11. Motewar A, Tilak M, Patil D, Bhamare N, Bhople L. Laparoscopic versus open management of duodenal perforation: a comparative study at a District General Hospital. Prz Gastroenterol 2013; 8(5): 315-9.

  12. Cakar E, Bayrak S, Bektaş H, Colak Ș, Guneyi A, Sevinc MM, et al. Carcinoid tumor of the cecum presenting with acute appendicitis: a case report. Chirurgia (Bucur) 2015; 110(2): 171-4.

  13. Józsa G, Mohay G, Pintér A, Vástyán A. Differential diagnosis of abdominal cysts in children. Orv Hetil 2015; 156(37): 1509-13.

  14. Krawczyk M, Mikneviciute J, Schürholz H. Incarcerated Umbilical Hernia After Colonoscopy in a Cirrhotic Patient. Am J Med 2015; 128(7): e13-4.

  15. Rodriguez EA, Lopez MA, Valluri K, Wang D, Fischer A, Perdomo T. Acute appendicitis secondary to acute promyelocytic leukemia. Am J Case Rep. 2015; 16: 73-6.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com