medigraphic.com
Órgano Ofical de la Facultad de Estomatología de la Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla

2019, Number 63

<< Back Next >>

Oral 2019; 20 (63)

Comparison of two final irrigation methods used in the preparation of the root canal system: PUI vs EDTA 18% by means of the MEB (in vitro study)

Holguín-Santana MP, López-Trujillo DM, Pietschmannn-S MÁ, Hernández-Santander T, Enríquez-Maldonado A, Mejía-Ferrel A

Language: Spanish
References: 34
Page: 1714-1718
PDF size: 829.59 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The elimination of the remains of vital and necrotic pulp tissue and the microorganisms of the root canal system is fundamental for success in endodontics. Disinfection of the root canal through irrigation and instrumentation is one of the most important factors in the prevention and treatment of apical periodontitis. Given the impossibility of reaching all areas of the canal system with the instrumentation, irrigation becomes especially important. In the last decade a series of systems of dispensing and agitation of irrigantes have been developed, such as the ultrasounds, these systems have the capacity of that the irrigante penetrate in the system of the root conduits, eliminating bacteria, pulpar tissue, rest of dentin and dentin barrel, are more effective than conventional irrigation systems, while being safe.


REFERENCES

  1. Coehn Burs. 2004. Vías de la pulpa. McGrawHill. primera parte. Cap. 8 Pp. 232, 255, 256, 257, 284-86.

  2. Mario Roberto Leonardo. 2005. Endodoncia, tratamiento de conductos radiculares, principios técnicos y biológicos. Pp. 1-2, 436-37.

  3. Siqueira J, Rocas I, Favieri A, Lima K. Chemomechanical reduction of the bacterial population in the root canal after instrumentation and irrigation with 1%, 2.5% and 5.25% sodium hipochlorite. J Endod. 2000, 26(6): 331-34.

  4. Gambarini G, De Luca M. Chemical stability of heated sodium hypochlorite endodontic irrigants. J Endod 1998, 24(6): 432-34.

  5. Gernhardt CR, Eppendorf K, Kozlowski A, Brant M. Toxicity of concentrated sodium hypochlorite used as an edodontic irrigant. Int Endod J 2004; 37(1): 272-80.

  6. Ingle J. 1993. Endodoncia. 3a edición. Editorial Mac Graw Hill. Mexico.

  7. Carson KR, Goodell G, and Scott B. Mc Clanahan: Comparison of the Antimicrobial Activity of Six Irrigants on Primary Endodontic Pathogens. J Endod 2005; 31(6): 471-73.

  8. Stuart CH, Beeson TJ, Owatz CB. Enterococcus faecalis: its role in root canal treatment failure and current concepts in the retreatment. J Endod 2006, 3(2): 93-98.

  9. Segura Egea JJ, Jiménez Rubio-Manzanares A, Llamas Cadaval R, Jiménez Planas A. El ácido etilen diamino tetraacético (EDTA) y su uso en endodoncia. Endodoncia 1997; 15(2).

  10. Padrós E, Padrós JL, Serrat A, Padrós E. Los enigmas de los adhesivos dentinarios. Arch Odontoestomatol 1992; 8: 63-77.

  11. Arana LA, Arana DF, Gomes JC. Efecto del grabado de la dentina radicular con ácido dietilenoaminotetra acético (EDTA) en la resistencia de unión de cementos autoadhesivos y autograbantes. Acta Odontológica Venezolana 2012; 50(4).

  12. Salazar GP. Efecto de desinfectantes cavitarios en la fuerza de adhesión de los sistemas adhesivos a esmalte dental: estudio in vitro. [tesis]. UNMSM, 2008.

  13. Ruiz CJ. Efecto de tres desinfectantes cavitarios sobre la fuerza de adhesión de un sistema adhesivo a dentina: Estudio in vitro [tesis]. Universidad Inca Garcilaso de la Vega, 2010.

  14. Azucero Maria M, Tinjaca Vanessa. Quelantes. Disponible en: http://www.javeriana.edu.co/academiapgendodonc ia/i_a_revision26. html

  15. Mazzitelli C. Evaluación de la unión entre cementos resinosos auto-adhesivos y la dentina. [tesis]. Universidad de Granada, 2008. Disponible en: http://hera.ugr.es/tesisugr/17652492.pdf

  16. Plotino G, Pameijer CH, Grande NM, Somma F Ultrasonics in Endodontics: A Review of the Literature. J Endod 2007, 33(2): 81-95.

  17. Jiang LM, Verhaagen B, Versluis M, Van der Sluis LWM. Influence of the Oscillation Direction of an Ultrasonic File on the Cleaning Efficacy of Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation. J Endod2010, 36:1372–76.

  18. Carver K, Nusstein J, Reader A, Beck M. In Vivo Antibacterial Efficacy of Ultrasound after Hand and Rotary Instrumentation in Human Mandibular Molars. J Endod 2007; 3389): 1038-43.

  19. Lui JN, Kuah HG, Chen NN. Effect of EDTA with and without Surfactants or Ultrasonicson Removal of Smear Layer. J Endod 2007; 33(4): 472-75.

  20. Claudia Mazzitelli. Evaluación de la unión entre cementos resinosos auto-adhesivos y la dentina. [tesis] Universidad de la Granada. Disponible en: http://hera.ugr.es/tesisugr/17652492.pdf

  21. Jensen SA, Walker TL, Hutter JW, Nicoll BK. Comparison of the cleaning efficacy of passive sonic activation and passive ultrasonic activation after hand instrumentation in molar root canals. J Endod1999, 25(11): 735-38.

  22. Li-sha Gu, Jong Ryul Kim, Junqi Ling, Kyung Kyu Choi, David H Pashley, Franklin R Tay Breschi L, Grandino S. 2009; 35(6): 791-804.

  23. Raffaele Paragliola, Vittorio Franco, Cristiano Fabiani, Annalisa Mazzoni, Fernando Nato, Franklin R. Tay, Lorenzo Breschi, Simone Grandini. Final Rinse Optimization: Influence of Different Agitation Protocol. Journal of Endodontics 2010, 36(2): 282-85.

  24. Uribe J, Priotto Eg, Cabral Jr. Restauraciones para amalgama. Planificación operatoria y preparaciones cavitarias. En: Uribe J. 1990. Operatoria dental. Ciencia practica. Madrid, Ediciones Avances Médico-Dentales, 99-100.

  25. Jiménez Polanco P, Navarro Majo Jl, Murtra Ferré J. Estudio de la morfología y composición del barro dentinario. Oris 1992; 42(1): 19-25.

  26. Torabinejad M, Handysides R, Khademi AA, Bakland LK. Clinical implications of the smear layer in endodontics: a review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002; 94(6): 658-66.

  27. Slavoljub Živković, et al. Smear Layer in Endodontics. Serbian Dental J 2005: 52(1): 7-19.

  28. Davis SR, Brayton S, Goldman M. The morphology of the prepared root canal: a study utilizing injectable silicone. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1972; 34(4): 642-48.

  29. Gavini G, Aun CE, Akisue E. Influencia de camada residual de magma no selamento apical de dentes obturados com cones de guta-percha e cimento de N-Rickert. RPG 1996; 3: 250-55.

  30. Padron E. Ultrasonido en endodoncia. Disponible en: http://www. innovadent si.com/pdf/ ultra_en_endodoncia.pdf

  31. Paula Dechichi C, C Gomes Moura. Smear layer: a brief review of generalconcepts. Part II: The most common agents to remove endodontic smear layer. RFO UPF 2006; 11(2): 100-04.

  32. Perez F, Calas P, Rochd T. Effect of dentin treatment on in vitro root tubule bacterial invasion. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996; 82(4): 446-51.

  33. Harrison AJ, Chivatxaranukul P, Parashos P, Messer HH. The effect of ultrasonically activated irrigation on reduction of Enterococcus faecalis in experimentally infected root canals. Int Endod J 2010; 43(11): 968-77.

  34. Bhuva B, Patel S, Wilson R, Niazi S, Beighton D, Mannocci F. The effectiveness of passive ultrasonic irrigation on intraradicular enterococcus faecalis biofilms in extracted single-rooted human teeth. Int Endod J 2010; 43(3): 241-50.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com