medigraphic.com
Órgano Oficial del Hospital Angeles Health System

2019, Number S1

<< Back Next >>

Acta Med 2019; 17 (S1)

In vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection

Sánchez AA, Hernández GCM, Kably AA

Language: Spanish
References: 18
Page: 22-26
PDF size: 135.43 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Infertility is a common entity that affects 15% of couples worldwide. The three basic components of infertility treatment are induction of ovulation, artificial insemination and in-vitro fertilization (IVF). In cases where the problem relies on the masculine factor ICSI (intracytoplasmic sperm injection) is an option to achieve fertilization. For the time being, the techniques used in assisted reproduction are not enough to fight back the harmful effects of age. IVF was first introduced in 1978, and the success rates have increased over the last decades. Many factors have contributed to achieve better results, including the emergence of new techniques and laboratory procedures. The aim of this review is to bring proper information based on scientific evidence, with the purpose of eradicating misconceptions and add specific data of reproductive assisted techniques.


REFERENCES

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, Division of Vital Statistics. Key Statistics from the National Survey of Family Growth. [Access 1 June 2019] Available at www.cdc.gov/nchs/nsfg/key_statistics/i.htm.

  2. Chandra A, Copen CE, Stephen EH. Infertility and impaired fecundity in the United States, 1982-2010: data from the national survey of family growth. National health statistics reports; no 67. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. 2013.

  3. Gearhart J, Coutifaris C: In vitro fertilization, the Nobel Prize, and human embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2011; 8 (1): 12-15.

  4. Eskew AM, Jungheim ES. A history of developments to improve in vitro fertilization. Mo Med. 2017; 114 (3):156-159.

  5. Steptoe PC. Edwards RG. Birth after reimplantation of a human embryo. Lancet. 1978; 2 (8085): 366.

  6. Wang J, Sauer MV. In vitro fertilization (IVF): a review of 3 decades of clinical innovation and technological advancement. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2006; 2 (4): 355-364.

  7. Bradley J, Voorhis V. In vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med. 2007; 356: 379-386.

  8. Giles J, Celada P, Vidal C. Fecundación in vitro FIV e ICSI. En: Remohí J, Pellicer A, Simón C, Navarro J, eds. Reproducción humana. 5a ed, Madrid: Mc Graw-Hill-Interamericana; 2017. p. 551-561.

  9. Alper MM, Fauser BC. Ovarian stimulation protocols for IVF: ¿is more better than less? Reprod Biomed Online. 2017; 34 (4): 345-353.

  10. Speroff L, Fritz M. Técnicas de reproducción asistida,en endocrinología ginecológica clínica y esterilidad. 8 ed. Madrid: lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2015. pp. 1215-1274.

  11. Liu H, Zhao H, Yu G, Li M, Ma S, Zhang H et al. Conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI): which is preferred for advanced age patients with five or fewer oocytes retrieved? Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018; 297 (5): 1301-1306.

  12. Saiz IC. The embryology interest group: updating ASEBIR’s morphological scoring system for early embryos, morulae and blastocysts. Med Reprod. 2018; 5 (1): 42-54.

  13. Tannus S, Son WY, Gilman A, Younes G, Shavit T, Dahan MH. The role of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in non-male factor infertility in advanced maternal age. Hum Reprod. 2017; 32 (1): 119-124.

  14. Yang L, Cai S, Zhang S, Kong X, Gu Y, Lu C et al. Single embryo transfer by Day 3 time-lapse selection versus Day 5 conventional morphological selection: a randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Hum Reprod. 2018; 33 (5): 869-876.

  15. Zhang W, Xiao X, Zhang J, Wang W, Wu J, Peng L et al. Clinical outcomes of frozen embryo versus fresh embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018; 298 (2): 259-272.

  16. Hernandez LC. Inyección intracitoplasmática del espermatozoide (ICSI): una técnica de reproducción asistida con indicaciones. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol. 2003; 54 (3): 157-163.

  17. Grimstad FW, Nangla AK, Luke B, Stern JE, Mak W. Use of ICSI in IVF cycles in women with tubal ligation does not improve pregnancy or live birth rates. Hum Reprod. 2016; 31 (12): 2750-2755.

  18. Li Z, Wang AY, Bowman M, Hammarberg K, Johson L, Safi N et al. ICSI does not increase the cumulative live birth rate in non-male factor infertility. Hum Reprod. 2018; 33 (7): 1322-1330.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com