Alegría CFG, Nieto MDL, Lara CE,Sánchez RL

Language: Spanish
References: 11
Page: 22-29
PDF size: 194.53 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The chemical-mechanical removal of caries with chemical products such as Papacárie^® is a feasible technique with a minimal invasion, it is an effective and painless method in both pediatric and adult patients. The objective of this research was to evaluate the behavior of pediatric patients during and after the removal of dental caries, and thus, to determine the acceptance of the treatment. Material and methods: An experimental study of the chemical-mechanical caries removal with Papacárie^® and restoration with Fuji IX glass ionomer was carried out in 33 pediatric patients aged four to six years assisted in the School of Dentistry of the Autonomous University of the State of Mexico; we evaluated the acceptance of the treatment during and after it through three different behavioral scales. Results: Of the 33 patients treated with this technique, 21 were male (11 with F3 behavior, 10 with F4 behavior) and 12 were female (of whom eight had F3 behavior and four F4 behavior), 54.5% scored 2, showing a behavior of «calmed and asleep» during the procedure; considering the visual scale of faces during and after the Papacárie^® application, the majority obtained a score of 1. Conclusions: The chemical-mechanical removal of caries with Papacárie^® is atraumatic and minimally invasive, constituting a feasible and useful alternative, since it showed that it favors the acceptance of the treatment and improves the behavior in pediatric patients.

REFERENCES

1. Sistema de Vigilancia Epidemiológica de Patologías Bucales, Resultados del sistema de vigilancia epidemiológica de patologías bucales SIVEPAB 2015, [Internet], SIVEPAB; 2015. Disponible en: https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/212323/SIVEPAB-2015.pdf.

2. Aguirre AA, Rios CT, Huamán SJ, França CM, Fernandes KPS, Mesquita FR et al, La práctica restaurativa atraumática: una alternativa dental bien recibida por los niños, Rev Panam Salud Pública, 2012; 31: 148-152.

3. Deng Y, Feng G, Hu B, Kuang Y, Song J, Effects of Papacarie on children with dental caries in primary teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Int J Paediatr Dent, 2018; 28 (4): 361-372.

4. Quiles MJ, van-der Hofstadt CJ, Quiles Y, Instrumentos de evaluación del dolor en pacientes pediátricos: una revisión (2.a parte), Rev Soc Esp Dolor, 2004; 11 (6): 52-61.

5. Eberhard FME, Mora DX, Manejo del dolor en el paciente pediátrico, Rev Chil Pediatría, 2004; 75 (3): 277-279.

6. García LF, Análisis comparativo entre las distintas escalas de valoración del comportamiento, ansiedad y miedo dental en odontopediatría, Revisión Bibliográfica, 16.

7. Motta LJ, Bussadori SK, Campanelli AP, da Silva AL, Alfaya TA, de Godoy CHL et al, Efficacy of Papacarie® in reduction of residual bacteria in deciduous teeth: a randomized, controlled clinical trial, Clinics, 2014; 69 (5): 319-322.

8. Sahana S, Vasa AAK, Geddam D, Reddy VK, Nalluri S, Velagapudi N, Effectiveness of chemomechanical caries removal agents Papacarie(®) and Carie-CareTM in primary molars: an in vitro study, J Int Soc Prev Community Dent, 2016; 6 (Suppl 1): S17-22.

9. Nadanovsky P, Cohen Carneiro F, Souza de Mello F, Removal of caries using only hand instruments: a comparison of mechanical and chemo-mechanical methods, Caries Res, 2001; 35 (5): 384-389.

10. Flores DME, Trabajo de titulación presentado en conformidad con los requisitos establecidos para optar por el título de Odontólogo, :107.

11. Bussadori SK, Guedes CC, Bachiega JC, Santis TO, Motta LJ, Clinical and radiographic study of chemical-mechanical removal of caries using Papacárie: 24-month follow up, J Clin Pediatr Dent, 2011; 35 (3): 251-254.