Schlitt NJF, Gómez CR

Language: Spanish
References: 16
Page: 218-224
PDF size: 165.38 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Hysterectomy is the most frequent surgical procedure of gynecological practice. It is performed by different surgical approaches: laparotomy, vaginal, laparoscopy and robot-assisted laparoscopy. Objective: To analyze the incidence of the different approaches to hysterectomy in the treatment of benign disease of the uterus in the Angeles Pedregal Hospital, and to compare their results. Material and methods: Transversal and descriptive study was carried out through the collection of data from the clinical files of patients who underwent laparotomy, vaginal, laparoscopic or robot assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy during January 01, 2015 to December 31 of the same year. The parameters evaluated and com-pared were: average hospital stay, surgical and anesthesia time, bleeding amount, postoperative pain and intra and postoperative complications. Results: The sample studied consisted of 213 patients. The most frequent surgical approach was abdominal hysterectomy (61.97%), which presented the highest rate of transoperative and postoperative complications, the highest amount of bleeding and length of hospital stay. Vaginal and minimally invasive approaches, has the lowest rate of surgical complications. Conclusions: Minimally invasive techniques and vaginal hysterectomy, due to its low rate of morbidity and mortality should be considered of choice for the surgical management of benign uterine disease.

REFERENCES

1. Aarts JW, Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Tavender E, Garry R, Mol BW et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; (8): CD003677.

2. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 444: choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 114 (5): 1156-1158.

3. Chen B, Ren DP, Li JX, Li CD. Comparison of vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy: a prospective non-randomized trial. Pak J Med Sci. 2014; 30 (4): 875-879.

4. Olive DL, Parker WH, Cooper JM, Levine RL. The AAGL classification system for laparoscopic hysterectomy. Classification committee of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2000; 7 (1): 9-15.

5. Ayala-Yáñez R, Briones-Landa C, Anaya-Coeto H, Leroy-López L, Zavaleta-Salazar R. Histerectomía total laparoscópica: estudio descriptivo de la experiencia institucional con 198 casos. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2010; 78 (11): 605-611.

6. Ayala-Yáñez R, Olaya-Guzmán EJ, Haghenbeck-Altamirano J. La robótica en ginecología. Antecedentes, viabilidad y conveniencia. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2012; 80 (6): 409-416.

7. Gallardo-Valencia LE, Gallardo-Fuentes JJ, Ruz-Barros RE. Histerectomía laparoscópica asistida con robot. Reporte del primer caso en México. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2014; 82 (10): 705-710.

8. Rossaint R, Bouillon B, Cerny V, Coats TJ, Duranteau J, Fernández-Mondéjar E et al. The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: fourth edition. Crit Care. 2016; 20: 100.

9. Lachiewicz MP, Moulton LJ, Jaiyeoba O. Infection prevention and evaluation of fever after laparoscopic hysterectomy. JSLS. 2015; 19 (3). pii: e2015.00065.

10. Kovavisarach E, Siriwong O. Risk factors related to febrile morbidity after abdominal hysterectomy. J Med Assoc Thai. 2012; 95 (1): 1-5.

11. ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins--Gynecology. ACOG practice bulletin No. 104: antibiotic prophylaxis for gynecologic procedures. Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 113 (5): 1180-1189.

12. Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr L, Garry R. Methods of hysterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2005; 330 (7506): 1478.

13. AAGL Advancing Minimally Invasive Gynecology Worldwide. AAGL position statement: route of hysterectomy to treat benign uterine disease. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011; 18 (1): 1-3.

14. Wright JD, Ananth CV, Lewin SN, Burke WM, Lu YS, Neugut AI et al. Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease. JAMA. 2013; 309 (7): 689-698.

15. Jonsdottir GM, Jorgensen S, Cohen SL, Wright KN, Shah NT, Chavan N et al. Increasing minimally invasive hysterectomy: effect on cost and complications. Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 117 (5): 1142-1149.

16. Yi YX, Zhang W, Zhou Q, Guo WR, Su Y. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy vs abdominal hysterectomy for benign disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011; 159 (1): 1-18.