medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-3070 (Electronic)

2018, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cub Oftal 2018; 31 (2)

Correction of high myopia with ACR-128 phakic lens implantation

Cárdenas DT, Valdés GG, Sánchez AL, Fumero GFY, Cuan AY, Montero DE

Language: Spanish
References: 32
Page: 1-10
PDF size: 258.97 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The high myopia, by definition, is that equal or bigger to -6 spherical dioptrías; not in function of the bend high corneal, like it is the case of the queratocono, neither for the sclerosis of the crystalline lens that happens in stages preseniles, but in dependence of the axial longitude bigger than 25,5 or 26,0 mm. The optic correction of these high defects is difficult, since it is frequent that the patients feel uncomfortable with the glasses use, because they don't obtain a good quality of vision and with the purpose of improving it, different surgical procedures have been developed. Young patient 26 years old is presented with high myopia that doesn't adapt to the contact eyeglasseses and she doesn't want to continue with the equivalent spherical preoperatorio -11,5 and -6 dioptrías diminish at -1,00 and - 0,5 respectively and the visual sharpness without glasses of bill fingers and 0,1 at 0,8 and 0,9 respectively. With this case it is evidenced that the lenses fáquicas are an option with good results in the correction of the high myopia.


REFERENCES

  1. Wong TY, Ferreira A, Hughes R, Hughes R, Carter G, Mitchell P4. Epidemiology and disease burden of pathologic myopia and myopic choroidal neovascularization: an evidence-based systematic review. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;157:9-25.

  2. Pan CW, Dirani M, Cheng CY, Wong TY, Saw SM. The age-specific prevalence of myopia in Asia: a meta-analysis. Optom Vis Sci. 2015;92(3):258-66.

  3. Morgan IG, Rose K. Yunnan minority eye study suggests that ethnic differences in myopia are due to different environmental exposures. Invest Opthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56:4430.

  4. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision; 2015 [citado 20 de enero de 2017]. Disponible en: http://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/2015

  5. Hashemi H, Rezvan F, Beiranvand A, Papi OA, Hoseini YH, Ostadimoghaddam H, et al. Prevalence of refractive errors among high school students in western Iran. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2014;9(2):232-9.

  6. Soler M. Prevalencia de errores refractivos en niños africanos [Tesis]; 2011 [citado 20 de enero de 2017]. Disponible en: http://0-hera.ugr.es.adrastea.ugr.es/tesis ugr/19806735.pdf

  7. Dolgin E. The myopia boom. Nature. 2015;519(7543):276-8.

  8. Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, Jong M, Naidoo KS. Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology. 2016:123:1036-42.

  9. Chassine T, Villain M, Hamel CPDV. How can we prevent myopia progression? Eur J Ophthalmol. 2015;25(4):280-5.

  10. Williams KM, Verhoeven VJM, Cumberland P, Bertelsen G, Wolfram C, Buitendijk GH, et al. Prevalence of refractive error in Europe: The European Eye Epidemiology (E3) Consortium. Eur J Epidemiol. 2015;30(4):305-15.

  11. Rey-Rodríguez DV, Álvarez-Peregrina C, Moreno-Montoya J. Prevalencia y factores asociados a miopía en jóvenes. Rev Mex Oftalmol. 2016 [citado 20 de enero de 2017]. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S018745191630066X

  12. Brusi L, Argüello L, Alberdi A, Bergamini J, Toledo F, Teresa M, et al. Informe de la salud visual y ocular de los países que conforman la Red Epidemiológica Iberoamericana para la Salud Visual y Ocular (REISVO), 2009 y 2010. Rev Cienc Tecnol Salud Vis Ocul. 2015;13:11-43.

  13. Lantigua I, González Y, Machado E, Torrico M, Padilla C. Resultados del LASIK miópico en el Instituto Cubano de Oftalmología “Ramón Pando Ferrer”. Rev Cubana Oftalmol. 2012;25(1):12-20.

  14. Sherwin JC, Mackey DA. Update on the epidemiology and genetics of myopic refractive error. Expert Rev Ophthalmol. 2014:1-42.

  15. Read SA, Collins MJ, Vincent SJ. Light exposure and physical activity in myopic and emmetropic children. Optom Vis Sci. 2014;91(3):330-41.

  16. Zhou Z, Ma X, Yi H, Pang X, Shi Y, Chen Q. Factors underlying different myopia prevalence between middle- and low-income provinces in China. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(5):1060-2.

  17. Wu LJ, You QS, Duan JL, Luo YX, Liu LJ, Li X. Prevalence and associated factors of myopia in high-school students in Beijing. PloS One. 2015;10(3):e0120764.

  18. Zadnik K. Who says there’s nothing new under the Sun? Optom Vis Sci. 2015; 92:392-3.

  19. Choi J, Han K, Park Y-M, La YT. Low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin is associated with myopia in Korean adolescents. Investig Ophthalmology Vis Sci. 2014;55(4):2041-7.

  20. McKnight CM, Sherwin JC, Yazar S, Forward H, Tan AX, Hewitt AW, et al. Myopia in young adults is inversely related to an objective marker of ocular sun exposure: The Western Australian Raine Cohort Study. Am J Ophthalmol. Elsevier Inc. 2014;158(5):1079-85.

  21. Holden B, Sankaridurg P, Smith E, Aller T, Jong M, He M. Myopia an underrated global challenge to vision: Where the current data takes us on myopia control. Eye (Lond). 2014;28(2):142-6.

  22. Di Ruggiero M. Declaración de Helsinki, principios y valores bioéticos en juego en la investigación médica con seres humanos. Rev Colomb Bioét. 2011;6(1):125-44.

  23. Van der Heijde GL, Fechner PU, Worst JG: Optical consequences of implantation of a negative intraocular lens in myopic patients. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 1988;193:99-102.

  24. American Academy of Ophthalmology. Refractive Surgery. EE.UU.: Basic and Clinical Science Course; 2015.

  25. Alió Jl, Plaza-Puche AB, Cavas F, Yébana Rubio P, Sala E. An angle-supported foldable phakic intraocular lens for correction of myopia: A five-year follow-up. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2017;92(1):4-11.

  26. Knorz MC, Lane SS, Holland SP. Angle-supported phakic intraocular lens for correction of moderate to high myopia: Three-year interim results in international multicenter studies. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(3):469-80.

  27. Kohnen T, Maxwell A, Holland S. Correction of moderate to high myopia with a foldable, angle-supported phakic intraocular lens. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:1027-35.

  28. Ruiz Y, Capote A. Efectividad de los LIOs fáquicos Artisan/Artiflex en la corrección de la alta miopía. Trabajo de terminación de residencia para optar por el título de Especialista de I Grado en Oftalmología. Instituto Cubano de Oftalmología “Ramón Pando Ferrer”, La Habana, Cuba; 2007.

  29. Ruiz Y. Experiencia con los lentes fáquicos Artiflex como opción correctiva de la alta miopía. Rev Cubana Oftalmol. 2010 [citado 20 de enero de 2017];23(1). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S086421762010000100007&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es

  30. Ruiz Y. Efectividad de los lentes fáquicos Artisan en la corrección de la alta miopía. Rev Cubana Oftalmol. 2010 [citado 20 de enero de 2017];23(1). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S086421762010000200011&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es

  31. Ruiz Y. Estudio del endotelio corneal en la corrección de alta miopía con lente intraocular fáquica Artisan. Rev Cubana Oftalmol. 2009 [citado 20 de enero de 2017];22(1). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864-21762009000100002&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es

  32. López SM. Variación del endotelio corneal en pacientes operados de alta miopía con implante de lentes fáquicas. Rev Cubana Oftalmol. 2013 [citado 20 de enero de 2017];26(3). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S086421762013000300002&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com