medigraphic.com

2006, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc 2006; 44 (2)

Teaching evaluation at Medical School, UNAM

Salas-Gómez LE, Ortiz-Montalvo A, Alaminos-Sager LI

Language: Spanish
References: 40
Page: 171-180
PDF size: 276.90 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The purpose of this article is to offer a synthesis of what has been done in the Teaching Evaluation Program at the Medical School of the Auto-nomous National University of Mexico (UNAM). The Program involves three questionnaires of the students’ opinion that evaluate professors of the basic and sociomedical areas, microbiology and parasitology laboratory and surgery. Between 1994 and 2003, 134 811 questionnaires were answered to evaluate the teaching performance of 6262 professors of pregraduate students. Although the evaluation of teaching through a single way is insufficient, the results obtained allow us to affirm that the Medical School at UNAM has a good professor staff, as well as they are useful for the design of programs dedicated to the acknowledgment of excellence and the needs for teaching education.


REFERENCES

  1. 1. Arbisú M, Canales A, Crispín M, Cruz I, Figueroa A, Gilo M. Las políticas y los usos de la evaluación de la docencia en la educación superior: plantea-mientos y perspectivas. En: Rueda M, Díaz-Barriga F, editores. La evaluación de la docencia en la Uni-versidad. México: UNAM, Centro de Estudios sobre la Universidad; 2004. p. 203-204.

  2. 2. Carreras J. Evaluación de la calidad docente y promoción del profesorado (I). Situación de las facultades de medicina en el ámbito internacional. Educación Médica 2000;3(4):143-157.

  3. 3. World Summit on Medical Education. Proceedings. Edinburgh, UK, 8-12 August 1993. Med Educ 1994;28(Suppl 1):1-171.

  4. 4. Cashin WE, Downey RG. Using global student rating items for summative evaluation. J Educ Psychol 1992;84:563-572.

  5. 5. Marsh HW. Still weighting for right criteria to validate student evaluations of teaching in the IDEA System. J Educ Psychol 1995; 87:666-679.

  6. 6. Carvalho CR. The pedagogic training of graduate students at the School of Medicine of Ribeirao. Rev Paul Med 1992;110:91-96.

  7. 7. Finucanes I. Allery A, Haynes TM. Attitudes to teaching among teachers at a British medical school. Med Educ 1994;28:213-219.

  8. 8. García-Barbero M. Medical education in the light of the World Health Organization. Health for all strategy and the European Union. Med Educ 1995;29:3-12.

  9. 9. Feldman KA. Instructional effectiveness of college teachers as judged by teachers themselves, current and former students, colleagues, administrators and external (neutral) observers. Res Higher Educ 1989;30:113-135.

  10. 10. Marsh HW, Bailey M. Multidimensional students’ evaluations of teaching effectiveness: a profile analysis. J Higher Educ 1993;64:1-18.

  11. Irby DM. Clinical teacher effectiveness in medicine. J Med Educ 1978;53:808-815.

  12. Miller AH. Student assessments of teaching in higher education. Higher Educ 1998;17:3-15.

  13. Murray HG. The impact of formative and summative evaluation of teaching in North American universities. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 1984;9:117-132.

  14. D’Apollonia S, Abrami PC. Navigating student ratings of instruction. Am Psychologist 1997;52: 1198-1208.

  15. Abrami PC. How should we use student ratings to evaluate teaching? Res Higher Educ 1989;30: 221-227.

  16. McKeachie WJ. Research on college teaching: The historical background. J Educ Psychol 1990; 82:189-200.

  17. Marsh HW, Roche LA. Making students eva-luations of teaching effectiveness effective. Am Psychologist 1997; 52:1187-1197.

  18. Marschall E, Palca J. Teaching on research. Science 1992;257:1200.

  19. Bowles LT. The evaluation of teaching. Med Teacher 2000;22:221-224.

  20. Abrahamson S. Time to return medical schools to their of primary purpose: education. Acad Med 1996;71:343-347.

  21. Goldschmid ML. The evaluation and impro-vement of teaching in higher education. Higher Educ 1978; 7:221-245.

  22. Centra JA. Determining faculty effectiveness: Assessing teaching, research and service for personnel decisions and improvements. San Francisco, CA, USA: Jossey Bass; 1979.

  23. Irby DM. Evaluating instruction in medical edu-cation. J Med Educ 1983;58: 844-849.

  24. Cruse BD. Students’ evaluation and the university caveat professor. Higher Educ 1987;16:723-727.

  25. Dohner CH. Faculty evaluation. En: Memorias de la XI Conferencia Panamericana, Federación Panamericana de Asociaciones de Facultades de Medicina, México: 1987. p. 237-247.

  26. Rettie CS. Faculty evaluation. The relationship between attitudes and behavior, En: Memorias de la XI Conferencia Panamericana, Federación Panamericana de Asociaciones de Facultades de Medicina. México: 1987. p. 260-264.

  27. McKeachie WJ. Student ratings. The validity of use. Am Psychologist 1997; 52:1218-1225.

  28. McKaechie WJ. Can evaluating instruction improve teaching? New Direct Teach Learn 1987; 31:3-7.

  29. Abrami PC, D’Apollonia S, Cohen P. Validity of student ratings of instruction: What we know and what we do not. J Educ Psychol 1990; 82:219-231.

  30. Litzelman DK et al. Student and resident eva-luations of Faculty-How dependable are they? Academic Medicine 1999;74:10.

  31. Facultad de Medicina. Plan Único de Estudios de la Carrera de Médico Cirujano. Estructura del Plan Único de Estudios. Rev Facultad Med 1993;36:11-16.

  32. De la Fuente JR, Piña-Garza E, Gutiérrez-Ávila J. La formación del médico del siglo XXI y el Plan Único de Estudios de la Facultad de Medicina de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Educ Med Salud 1994;28:331-340.

  33. Valle R, et al. Student questionnaire to evaluate basic medical science teaching (METEQ-B). Rev Med IMSS 2004;42;5:405-411.

  34. Facultad de Medicina, Dirección General de Evaluación. Informe de evaluación de la docencia. Área básica y sociomédica, 2001-2002. México: UNAM; 2003.

  35. Facultad de Medicina, Dirección General de Evaluación. Informe de evaluación de la docencia. Laboratorio de Microbiología y Parasitología, 2001-2002. México: UNAM; 2003.

  36. Facultad de Medicina, Dirección General de Evaluación. Informe de evaluación de la docencia. Cirugía, 2001-2002. México: UNAM; 2003.

  37. Facultad de Medicina, Secretaría de Educación Médica, Departamento de Evaluación Educativa. Informe del Programa de Evaluación de la Enseñanza 2000-2003. México: UNAM; 2004.

  38. Fernández J, Mateo M. Student evaluation of university teaching quality: analysis of a questionnaire for a sample of university students in Spain. Educ Psychol Measure 1992;53:675-686.

  39. Kirschling HM, Fields J, Imle M, Mowery M, Tanner C, Perrin N, Stewart B. Evaluating teaching effectiveness. J Nurs Educ 1995; 34:401-410.

  40. Metcalfe DH, Matharu M. Students perception of good and bad teaching: report of a critical in-cident study. Med Educ 1995;29:193-217.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com