2019, Number 2
<< Back Next >>
Med Crit 2019; 33 (2)
Shock index as initial marker of hypovolemic shock in obstetric hemorrhage of the first trimester
Contreras MME, Carmona DA, Montelongo FJ
Language: Spanish
References: 29
Page: 73-78
PDF size: 205.62 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Obstetric hemorrhage continues to be the main cause of maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide, being higher in developing countries. Studies conducted by the World Health Organization (WHO) reveal that between 25 and 30% of maternal deaths are due to obstetric hemorrhage, such deaths usually begin when related to the development of hemorrhagic shock and its consequences, especially multiple organ dysfunction. Obstetric hemorrhage is defined as blood loss greater than or equal to 500 mL. The shock index (CI) is defined as the heart rate divided by the systolic blood pressure, it was first introduced in 1967 by Allgöwer and Burri. It has been studied in patients with and without trauma and is used in clinical practice to evaluate hypovolemic shock or the severity of non-hypovolemic shock and to help acute treatment in this context. In the normal non-pregnant population, the range of the normal CI is 0.5-0.7 and an IC of › 0.9 has been associated with a higher mortality. In the present work, the correlation of the shock index was made as an initial marker of hypovolemic shock in patients with obstetric hemorrhage in the first trimester. An observational, prospective, cross-sectional and analytical study was conducted in patients of all ages with first-trimester obstetric hemorrhage. It was observed that HF in patients with a diagnosis of first-trimester obstetric hemorrhage is significantly associated with hemodynamic instability and a higher probability of requiring blood products.
REFERENCES
King RW, Plewa MC, Buderer NM, Knotts FB. Shock index as a marker for significant injury in trauma patients. Acad Emerg Med. 1996;3(11):1041-1045.
Rady MY. The role of central venous oximetry, lactic acid concentration and shock index in the evaluation of clinical shock: a review. Resuscitation. 1992;24(1):55-60.
Birkhahn RH, Gaeta TJ, Van Deusen SK, Tloczkowski J. The ability of traditional vital signs and shock index to identify ruptured ectopic pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(5):1293-1296.
Cannon CM, Braxton CC, Kling-Smith M, Mahnken JD, Carlton E, Moncure M. Utility of the shock index in predicting mortality in traumatically injured patients. J Trauma. 2009;67(6):1426-1430.
Chandraharan E, Arulkumaran S. Massive postpartum haemorrhage and management of coagulopathy. Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Med. 2007;17(4):119-122.
Hall ME, George EM, Granger JP. El corazón durante el embarazo. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2011;64(11):1045-1050.
Félix-Sifuentes DJ. Choque hipovolémico, un nuevo enfoque de manejo. Rev Mex Anest. 2018;41(S1):169-174.
Sohn CH, Kim WY, Kim SR, Seo DW, Ryoo SM, Lee YS, et al. An increase in initial shock index is associated with the requirement for massive transfusion in emergency department patients with primary postpartum hemorrhage. Shock. 2013;40(2):101-105.
Le Bas A, Chandraharan E, Addei A, Arulkumaran S. Use of the “obstetric shock index” as an adjunct in identifying significant blood loss in patients with massive postpartum hemorrhage. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014;124(3):253-255.
Le Bas A, Chandraharan E, Addei A, Arulkumaran S. Use of the “obstetric shock index” as an adjunct in identifying significant blood loss in patients with massive postpartum hemorrhage. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014;124(3):253-255.
Prevention and Management of Postpartum Haemorrhage: Green-top Guideline No. 52. BJOG. 2017;124(5):e106-e149.
Medécigo M, Anayo C, Arce H. Diagnóstico y tratamiento del choque hemorrágico en obstetricia. Guía de práctica clínica. México: CENETEC; 2017.
Hernández-López GD, Graciano-Gaytán L, Buensuseso-Alfaro JA, Mendoza-Escorza J, Zamora-Gómez E. Hemorragia obstétrica posparto: reanimación guiada por metas. Rev Hosp Jua Mex. 2013;80(3):183-191.
Barton JR, Sibai BM. Severe sepsis and septic shock in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(3):689-706.
Prata N, Gerdts C. Measurement of postpartum blood loss. BMJ. 2010;340:c555.
Walfish M, Neuman A, Wlody D. Maternal haemorrhage. Br J Anaesth. 2009;103 Suppl 1:i47-i56.
Jauniaux E, Jurkovic D. Placenta accreta: pathogenesis of a 20th century iatrogenic uterine disease. Placenta. 2012;33(4):244-251.
Lalonde A; International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Prevention and treatment of postpartum hemorrhage in low-resource settings. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012;117(2):108-118.
Ruth D, Kennedy BB. Acute volume resuscitation following obstetric hemorrhage. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2011;25(3):253-260.
McCullough J. Transfusion medicine. Chap. 12. Transfusion therapy in specific clinical situations. 2nd edition. USA: Ed. Elsevier; 2005. pp. 309-358.
Rivas LR, López LE, Gastélum PC. Hemorragia en obstetricia. Rev Mex Med Tran. 2010;3(S1):S14-S20.
Crosby E. Re-evaluating the transfusion trigger: how low is safe? Am J Ther. 2002;9(5):411-416.
Carson JL, Hill S, Carless P, Hébert P, Henry D. Transfusion triggers: a systematic review of the literature. Transfus Med Rev. 2002;16(3):187-199.
Marshall JC. Transfusion trigger: when to transfuse? Crit Care. 2004;8 Suppl 2:S31-S33.
Rodríguez-Moyado H. Indicaciones para transfusión de eritrocitos. Rev Med IMSS. 2004;42(2):145-154.
Crosby E. Re-evaluating the transfusion trigger: how low is safe? Am J Ther. 2002;9(5):411-416.
Chen L, Reisner AT, McKenna TM, Gribok A, Reifman J. Diagnosis of hemorrhage in a prehospital trauma population using linear and nonlinear multiparameter analysis of vital signs. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2007;2007:3748-3751.
Hagiwara A, Kimura A, Kato H, Mizushima Y, Matsuoka T, Takeda M, et al. Hemodynamic reactions in patients with hemorrhagic shock from blunt trauma after initial fluid therapy. J Trauma. 2010;69(5):1161-1168.
Vandromme MJ, Griffin RL, Kerby JD, McGwin G Jr, Rue LW 3rd, Weinberg JA. Identifying risk for massive transfusion in the relatively normotensive patient: utility of the prehospital shock index. J Trauma. 2011;70(2):384-388; discussion 388-390.