medigraphic.com

2019, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Cir Cir 2019; 87 (3)

Laparoscopic procedures experience in Mexico during 2015: ¿Where are we?

Chávez-Saavedra G, Lara-Lona E, Hidalgo-Valadez C, Romero-Salinas N, Méndez-Sashida GJ

Language: Spanish
References: 35
Page: 292-298
PDF size: 195.10 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Background: 26 years have passed from the first laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Mexico. Since then the laparoscopy has been adopted of variable way and has extended into different specialties. Objective: To identify the place that laparoscopic approaches occupy at the present time in Mexico. Method: We searched the codes that had the word laparoscopy or laparoscopic in the records of the Automated System of Hospitable Discharges in 2015. Based on the obtained information there was realized a descriptive and retrospective study. Results: We found 55 different procedures in a total of 30,174. Of them, 79.7% in women and 20.3% in men. The most common age was between 25 and 29 years. The ten first ones were cholecystectomy, appendectomy, total abdominal laparoscopic hysterectomy, procedures to create esophago-gastric sphincter competence, unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, partial cholecystectomy, ovarian resection, umbilical hernia repair, incidental appen-dectomy and unilateral oophorectomy (94.6%). The States with the major number are Mexico City, State of Mexico, Jalisco, Guanajuato and Sonora. Conclusions: The laparoscopic procedures have increase in the national health systems and there is concordance of the most common with the international statistics. However, is necessary to diversify them and reduce the times of hospital stay. Its application is in process and it still face challenges in relation to availability of organizational elements, equipment, infrastructure and training, although there are different ways to overcome them.


REFERENCES

  1. Reddick E. Historia de la colecistectomía laparoscópica. De dónde venimos, dónde estamos, y hacia dónde vamos. Rev Mex Cir Endoscop. 2001;2:36-7.

  2. Gutiérrez RL, Grau L. Colecistectomía por laparoscopia: informe del primer caso realizado en México. Endoscopia. 1990;3:99-102.

  3. Carrasco JA, Chousleb A, Shuchleib S. Los cambios generados por la cirugía de invasión mínima en la educación quirúrgica. Cir Cir. 2011;79:11-3.

  4. Asociación Mexicana de Cirugía General y Consejo Mexicano de Cirugía General. Historia y evolución de la cirugía endoscópica. En: Tratado de cirugía general. 2.a ed. México, DF: Manual Moderno; 2008. p. 197-9.

  5. González V, Marenco CA, Chávez A, González L, Montalvo E. Colecistectomía laparoscópica: resultados de la experiencia del Hospital General de México a nueve años de implementada. Rev Mex Cir Endoscop. 2002;3:71-3.

  6. O’Malley E, Boyle E, O’Callaghan A, Coffey C, Walsh S. Role of laparoscopy in penetrating abdominal trauma: a systematic review. World J Surg. 2013;37:113-22.

  7. Karas J. Laparoscopy in non-trauma abdominal emergencies. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2010;36:10-3.

  8. Tiwari M, Reynoso J, High R, Tsang A, Oleynikov D. Safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of common laparoscopic procedures. Surg Endosc. 2011;24:1127-35.

  9. Moria A, Tulandi T. A critical review of laparoscopic total hysterectomy versus laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. Gynecol Surg. 2011;8:7-12.

  10. Pearl J, Price R, Richardson W, Fanelli R. Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and use of laparoscopy for surgical problems during pregnancy. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:3479-92.

  11. Mazón J, Moreno M, Magos F, Rojano M, Palacios JA, Herrera JJ. Cirugía endoscópica ambulatoria. 2004. (Consultado el 2 de julio de 2016.) Disponible en: http://www.ejournal.unam mx/rfm/no47-4/RFM47403.pdf

  12. López G, Zavalza JF. Paipilla O, Lee S. Colecistectomías laparoscópicas realizadas en unidad de cirugía ambulatoria. Cir Gen. 2011;33:104-9.

  13. Tuschy B, Berlit S, Sütterlin M, Hornemann A. Duration of hospital stay after gynaecologic laparoscopic surgery: preferences of patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013;288:335-9.

  14. Rocha E, Quijano O, Cortés G, López D, Abrego J, Gómez J. Tratamiento laparoscópico del cáncer de endometrio. Experiencia institucional. Gac Mex Onc. 2015;14:8-35.

  15. Sánchez GM. Indicadores de gestión hospitalaria. Rev Inst Nal Enf Resp Mex. 2005;18:132-41.

  16. Gómez DG, Sesma S, Becerril VM, Knaul FM, Arreola H, Frenk J. Sistema de salud de México. Salud Pública Mex. 2011;53:S220-32.

  17. Priego P, Ramiro C, Molina J, Rodríguez G, Lobo E, Galindo J, et al. Results of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a third-level university hospital after 17 years of experience. Rev Enferm Dig. 2009;101:20-30.

  18. Szabo K, Rothe A, Shamiyeh A. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy – review over 20 years with attention on acute cholecystitis and conversion. Eur Surg. 2012;44:28-37.

  19. Litwin D, Cahan M. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Clin N Am. 2008;88:295-313.

  20. Guller U, Hervey S, Purves H, Muhlbaier L, Eubanks S, Pietrobon R. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database. Ann Surg. 2004;239:43-52.

  21. Hernias de la pared abdominal. Tratamiento actual. Mayagoitia González, J. Alfil. 2a. Edición, Ciudad de México, México, 2009, pp. 395-407.

  22. Edwards CC II, Bailey RW. Laparoscopic hernia repair: the learning curve. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2000;10:149-53.

  23. McCormack K, Wake B, Pérez J, Fraser C, Cook J, McIntosh E, et al. Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2005;9:1-203.

  24. Secretaría de Salud. MH 2015: Mejores Hospitales de la Secretaría de Salud Federal y los Servicios Estatales de Salud. Revista de la Dirección General de Evaluación del Desempeño. 2015;1:12-3.

  25. Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-040-SSA2-2004, en materia de información en salud. Diario Oficial de la Federación, 28 de septiembre de 2005.

  26. Moria A, Tulandi T. A critical review of laparoscopic total hysterectomy versus laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. Gynecol Surg. 2011;14:28-35.

  27. Bedaiwy M, Sharp H, Falcone T. Hurd W. Gynecologic laparoscopy. Gynecologic laparoscopic in clinical reproductive medicine and surgery: a practical guide. Springer Science Business Media. Durham, North Carolina, EUA, 2011.

  28. Campos JG, Bravo E, Sedano A, Torres J, Hernández G, Estrada C, et al. Experiencia de nefrectomía laparoscópica en el Hospital Central Militar. Rev Mex Urol. 2013;73:72-6.

  29. Yoon PD, Pang T, Siriwardhane M, Richardson A, Hollands M, Pleass H, et al. Laparoscopic partial cholecystectomy: a way of getting out of trouble. Int J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis. 2016;6:68-75.

  30. Albright JB, Fakhre GP, Nields WW, Metzger PP. Incidental appendectomy: 18-year pathologic survey and cost effectiveness in the nonmanaged- care setting. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;205:298-306.

  31. Dumon K, Murayama K. Bariatric surgery outcomes. Surg Clin N Am. 2011;91:1313-38.

  32. López F, Herrera M. El papel actual del tratamiento quirúrgico. ¿Puede la cirugía curar enfermedades metabólicas? Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex. 2008;65:568-78.

  33. Mason R, Moazzez A, Moroney J, Katkhouda N. Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy in obese patients: outcomes using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215:88-99.

  34. Romero C. Cirugía metabólica en América Latina. Cir Gen. 2010;32:121-4.

  35. Tiwari M, Reynoso J, High R, Tsang A, Oleynikov D. Safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of common laparoscopic procedures. Surg Endosc. 2010;25:1127-35.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com