medigraphic.com
ISSN 2307-2113 (Electronic)
Revista Cubana de Información en Ciencias de la Salud (ACIMED)

2019, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Revista Cubana de Información en Ciencias de la Salud (ACIMED) 2019; 30 (1)

The holistic knowledge management: adherence analysis of the Rojas, Bermúdez and Morales model

Corrêa F, Ziviani F, Barbosa FCD

Language: Portugués
References: 50
Page: 1-19
PDF size: 221.00 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The holistic paradigm is an option for the development of knowledge management models pointed out years ago. This approach, called holistic knowledge management, aims to tackle the management of knowledge in its whole so enabling the full management of this asset. In this context, this research aims to analyze the adherence of the model of Rojas, Bermúdez and Morales to holistic GC. Through the qualitative Content Analysis and quantification of the adherence to the holistic knowledge management, this model was analyzed. As a result, the model of Rojas, Bermúdez and Morales, proposed for the health area, partially adheres to the holistic KM. This result shows that a holistic knowledge management model for the health area is still a gap to be overcome, as well as points out features to be addressed in a holistic knowledge management approach. However, this result is not conclusive, because it comes from the analysis of a single model, being a limitation of this research. This limitation suggests for future research, the analysis of other models of knowledge management proposed for the health area, following the methods applied in this research.


REFERENCES

  1. Mutuwa PL, Maiga G. A knowledge management model for pediatric health care practice. Arusha, Tanzânia: Proceedings of the 2th Pan African International Conference on Science, Computing and Telecommunications; 2014. p. 40-5.

  2. Sánchez IRA, Ponjuán Dante G. Diseño de un modelo de gestión de conocimiento para entornos virtuales de aprendizaje en salud. Rev Cubana Inform Cienc Salud. 2016;27(2):138-53.

  3. Nonaka I, Takeuchi H. Criação de conhecimento na empresa: como as empresas japonesas geram a dinâmica da inovação. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Campus; 1997.

  4. Davenport TH, Prusak L. Conhecimento empresarial: como as organizações gerenciam o seu capital intelectual. Rio de Janeiro: Campus; 1998.

  5. Bem RM, Coelho CCSR, Dandolini G. Knowledge management framework to the university libraries. Library Management. 2016;37(4/5):221-36.

  6. Weber F. Standardisation in knowledge management – towards a common KM framework in Europe. Proceedings of the UNICOM Seminar “Towards Common Approaches & Standards in KM”; 2002.

  7. Fteimi N. Analyzing the literature on knowledge management frameworks: Towards a normative knowledge management classification schema. Proceedings of the 23rd European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS); 2015.

  8. Heisig P. Harmonisation of knowledge management – comparing 160 KM frameworks around the globe. J Knowl Manag. 2009;13(4):4-31.

  9. Rubenstein-Montano. A systems thinking framework for knowledge management. Decis Sup Syst. 2001;31(1):5-16.

  10. Holsapple CW, Joshi KD. Description and analysis of existing knowledge management frameworks. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on IEEE; 1999. p. 15.

  11. Rojas LAR, Bermúdez GMT, Morales AAO. A knowledge management model applied to health tourism in Colombia. Heidelber, Berlin: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Knowledge Management in Organizations: Service and Cloud Computing; 2013. p. 537-46.

  12. Bardin L. Análise de conteúdo. Lisboa: Edições 70; 1977.

  13. Uden L. 7th International Conference on Knowledge Management in Organizations: Service and Cloud Computing. Springer; 2013.

  14. Kuhn TS. A estrutura das revoluções científicas. São Paulo: Editora Perspectiva; 1998.

  15. Coimbra JÁA. Considerações sobre a Interdisciplinaridade. São Paulo: Interdisciplinaridade em Ciências Ambiental; 1996.52-70.

  16. Capra F. A teia da vida: uma nova compreensão científica dos sistemas vivos. São Paulo: Cultrix; 2000.

  17. Sommerman A. A inter e a transdisciplinaridade. Rio Grande do Sul: Proceedings of the X Seminário Internacional de Educação; 2005.

  18. Maciel C, Silva A. Gerenciando pessoas utilizando modelos holísticos. Rev Administr Contemp. 2008;12(1):35-58.

  19. Silva RO. Teorias da administração. São Paulo: Pearson Education do Brasil; 2013.

  20. Andrade R, Amboni N. Teoria Geral da Administração. Brasil: Elsevier; 2017.

  21. Weil P. O novo paradigma holístico: ondas a procura do mar. In: Brandão DMS, Crema R, organizadores. O novo paradigma holístico: ciência, filosofia, arte e mística. São Paulo: Summus; 1991. p. 14-38.

  22. Pereira MF. A gestão organizacional em busca do comportamento holístico. In: Angeloni MT. Organizações do conhecimento: infra-estrutura, pessoas e tecnologia. São Paulo: Saraiva; 2002. p. 2-28.

  23. Flach CRC, Behrens MA. Paradigmas educacionais e sua influência na prática pedagógica. Brasil: Proceedings of the 8 Congresso Nacional De Educação: 2008.

  24. Crema R. Introdução à visão holística: breve relato de viagem do velho ao novo paradigma. São Paulo: Summus; 2015.

  25. Vergara SC. Sobre a intuição na tomada de decisão. Cadernos EBAP; 1993:62.

  26. Crema R. Abordagem holística: integração do método analítico e sintético. In: Brandão DMS, Crema R, organizadores. O novo paradigma holístico: ciência, filosofia, arte e mística. São Paulo: Summus; 1991. p. 83-99.

  27. Rockart JF. Chief executives define their own data needs. Harvard Business Review. 1979;57(2):81-93.

  28. Skyrme D, Amidon D. The knowledge agenda. J Knowl Manag. 1997;1(1):27-37.

  29. Davenport TH, De Long DW, Beers MC. Successfull knowledge management projects. Sloan Manag Rev. 1998;39(2):43-57.

  30. Akhavan P, Jafari M, Fathian M. Critical success factors of knowledge management systems: A multi-case analysis. Eur Buss Rev. 2006;18(2):97-113.

  31. Al-Mabrouk K. Critical success factors affecting knowledge management adoption: A review of the literature. Proceedings of the Innovations in Information Technology. Dubai. United Arab Emirates: IITFALSO; 2006.

  32. Lin YC, Lin LK. Critical success factors for knowledge management studies in construction. Tokio, Japan: Proceedings of the 23rd International Symposium on Robotics and Automation in Construction, 2006. p. 768-72.

  33. Wong KY. Critical success factors for implementing knowledge management in small and medium enterprises. Industr Manag Data Syst. 2005;105(3):261-79.

  34. Wong KY, Aspinwall E. An empirical study of the important factors for knowledgemanagement adoption in the SME Sector. J Knowl Manag. 2005;9(3):64-82.

  35. Gai S, Xu C. Research of critical success factors for implementing knowledge management in China. Xi'na, China: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering; 2009. p. 561-4.

  36. Abbaszadeh MA, Ebrahimi M, Fotouhi H. Developing a causal model of critical success factors for knowledge management implementation. Cairo, Egypt: Proceedings of the International Conference on Education and Management Technology; 2010. p. 701-5.

  37. Valmohammadi C. Investigation and assessment of critical success factors of knowledge management implementation in Iranian small-to-medium sized enterprises. J Appl Sci. 2010;10(19):2290-6.

  38. Wai YM, Hong ANH, Din SB. Critical success factors and perceived benefits of knowledge management implementation: Towards a conceptual framework. Austr J Bas Appl Sci. 2011;5(10):754-60.

  39. Sedighi M, Zand F. Knowledge management: Review of the critical success factors and development of a conceptual classification model. Bangkok, Thailand: Proceedings of the International Conference on ICT and Knowledge Engineering; 2012. p. 1-9.

  40. Silva Junior A, Polizel CEG, Silva POM. Critical success factors for knowledge management at a private higher education school. Rev Bras Gest Neg. 2012;14(42):102-22.

  41. Arif MJ, Shalhoub MHB. Critical success factors with its effective role in knowledge management initiatives in public and private organizations in saudi Arabia: experts perspectives. Lif Sci J. 2014;11(6):636-45.

  42. Zieba M, Zieba K. Knowledge management critical success factors and the innovativeness of KIBS companies. Engin Econom. 2014;25(4):458-65.

  43. Kumar S, Singh V, Haleem A. Critical success factors of knowledge management: modelling and comparison using various techniques. Internat J Industr Syst Engin. 2015;21(2):180-206.

  44. Chandler A. Strategy and Structure. Cambrige: MIT Press; 1962.

  45. Learned EP, Andrews KR, Christensen CR, Guth WD. Business policy: text and cases. EE.UU.: Irwin Professional Publishing; 1965.

  46. Katz RL. Cases and concepts in corporate strategy. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.; 1970.

  47. Quinn JB. Strategies for change: logical incrementalism. Irwin Professional Publishing; 1980.

  48. Hofer CW, Schendel D. Strategy formulation: Analytical concepts. West Publishing; 1978.

  49. Jauch LR, Glueck WF. Business policy and strategic management. McGraw-Hill; 1988.

  50. Mintzberg H. Opening up the definition of strategy. In: Quinn JB, Mintzberg H, James RM (eds). The strategic process – concepts, contexts and cases. Prentice-Hall Inc; 1988.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com