2018, Number 5
<< Back Next >>
Rev Mex Oftalmol 2018; 92 (5)
Comparative study between surgical techniques (manual small incision versus phacoemulsification) for cataract surgery
Robles-Gutiérrez CR, Moctezuma-Dávila M, Meza-Velarde HA, Martínez-Castrellón A, Rangel-Charqueño MG, Padrón-Salas A, Moctezuma-Bravo GS
Language: Spanish
References: 23
Page: 239-246
PDF size: 209.94 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Cataract surgery is practiced worldwide.
Objective: To determine the postoperative results of visual acuity, endothelial cell
loss and posterior capsule opacity between two cataract surgery techniques.
Type of Study: Randomized, controlled, dou-
ble-blind clinical trial (ECCA), in patients with cataract, with an 18-month follow-up. Exclusion Criteria: Patients with proliferative
diabetic retinopathy, macular edema, amblyopia and glaucoma.
Elimination Criteria: Patients that required a change in
the surgical technique or that did not complete follow up.
Sample Size: 75 patients according to Peduzzi and Frank studies.
Bioethical Considerations: Study approved by the Research and Bioethics Institutional Committee. Following the Helsinki,
Code of Nuremberg and General Law of Health guidelines, all the patients signed an informed consent form. Data are described
with measures of central tendency, dispersion and proportions. Statistical analysis used Chi-square, Fisher’s exact
test, Student’s t, ANOVA and linear regression tests.
Results: 57 patients were included: 35 women and 22 men, 26 diabetics
and 8 with non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy. 34 patients were treated with manual small incision (IMP) and 23 with
phacoemulsification (FACO). The average age group was 70.4 and 67.9 years, respectively. Visual acuity and posterior capsule
opacification were statistically significant for both techniques. A decrease in endothelial cell count was observed for the
two techniques, but a greater change in the keratometry axis was present in IMP. In addition, endothelial polymorphism and
corneal pachymetry were increased in FACO.
Conclusion: IMP is not inferior to FACO.
REFERENCES
World Health Organization. Blindness and Visual Impairment. Actualizada 2006. Disponible en: http://www.who.int/features/factfiles/vision/04_ en.html
Rengaraj V, David C, Radhakrishnan M, Kenia H, Pariskshit G,Sabyasachi S. Manual Small Incision Cataract Surgery: A Review. Asia Pacific Academy of Ophthalmology 2012;1: 113Y119.
Barojas W, SanJuan E, Ortega G. Reporte de una campaña quirúrgica de catarata Instituto Nacional de Salud. Rev Mex de Oftalmol. 2010;84(2):91-5.
Parikshit G, Madan D, Praveen K, Nirmalm D. Why Do Phacoemulsification? Manual Small-Incision Cataract Surgery Is Almost as Effective, but Less Expensive. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:965-68.
Amar A, Dhivya A. Cost–effectiveness of cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2011,22:15-8.
Parikshit G, Prachi A, Sucheta K, Rahul D, Shilpa J, Madan D. Comparison of endothelial cell loss after cataract surgery: Phacoemulsification versus manual small-incision cataract surgery. Six-week results of a randomized control trial. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36:247-53.
Rohit A, Srivalli K, Ghanshyam P, Virender S. Comparative outcomes of manual small incision cataract surgery and phacoemulsification performed by ophthalmology trainees in a tertiary eye care hospital in India: a retrospective cohort design. BMJ Open. 2012;2:001035-001136.
Jia-yu Z, Yi-fan F, Jian-qiu C. Phacoemulsification versus manual small- incision cataract surgery for age-related cataract: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013;41:379-86.
Parikshit G, Sucheta K, Krishnaiah S, Rahul D, Shilpa J, Anand P. Safety and Efficacy of Phacoemulsification Compared With Manual Small Incisión Cataract Surgery by a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:869-74.
Peter Peduzzi, John Cocato, Elizabeth Kemper, Theodore R. Holford and Alvan R. Feinstein. A Simulation Study of the Number of Events per Variable in Logistic Regression Analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996; 49(12):1373-9.
Frank E. Harrell, Kerry L. Lee, David B. Matchar, and Thomas A. Reichert. Regression Models for Prognostic Prediction: Advantages, Problems, and Suggested Solutions. Cancer Treat Rep. 1985;69(10):1071-7.
Ellwein L, Urato C. Use of eye care and associated charges among the Medicare population: 1991-1998. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;85:822-9.
Priya T, Sarada D, Nihal T. Endothelial Cell Loss and Central Corneal Thickness in Patients With and Without Diabetes After Manual Small Incision Cataract Surgery. Cornea. 2011;30:424-8.
Sambuddha G, Indranil R, Pradyot N, Dipankar M, Lakshmi K, Subhalakshmi M. Prospective randomized comparative study of macular thickness following phacoemulsification and manual small incision cataract surgery. Acta Ophthalmologica. 2010;88:102-6.
Manea G, Stanca H. Specular microscopy and clinical correlations. Ophthalmology. 2011;55(3):22-9.
Tuft S, Coster D. The corneal endothelium. Eye. 1990;4(3):389-424.
Moschos M, Chatziralli I, Sergentanis T. Viscoat versus visthesia during phacoemulsification cataract surgery: corneal and foveal changes. BMC Ophthalmol. 2011;11:4-7.
Rosado N, Natalie A. The changing fate of the corneal endothelium in cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2012;23:3-6.
Schultz R, Glasser D, Matsuda M. Response of the corneal endothelium to cataract surgery. Arch Ophthalmol.1986;104:1164-9.
Ventura A, Walti R, Bohnke M. Corneal thickness and endothelial density before and after cataract surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85:18-20.
Fong C, Mitchell P, Rochtchina E, Cugati S, Hong T, Wang J. Three-year incidence and factors associated with posterior capsule opacification after cataract surgery: The Australian Prospective Cataract Surgery and Age-related Macular Degeneration Study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;157:171-9.
Ruit S, Tabin G, Chang D. A prospective randomized clinical trial of phacoemulsification vs manual sutureless small-incision extracapsular cataract surgery in Nepal. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143:32-8.
Seitzman G, Gottsch J, Stark W. Cataract surgery in patiens with Fuchs´ corneal dystrophy expanding recommendations for cataract surgery without simultaneous keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:441-6.