medigraphic.com
ISSN 2992-8036 (Electronic)
ISSN 2306-4102 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Colegio Mexicano de Ortopedia y Traumatología

2018, Number 5

<< Back Next >>

Acta Ortop Mex 2018; 32 (5)

Radiographic measurement of the acetabular angle for early diagnosis of hip development dysplasia

Osorio-García JJ, Mendieta-Alcántara GG

Language: Spanish
References: 21
Page: 274-278
PDF size: 139.86 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Background: In order to avoid sequelae in the development dysplasia of the hip the treatment should be early; The acetabular angle corresponds to the inclination of the roof of the acetabulum. Stanisvljevic indicates that to properly measure the acetabular angle, the hips should be placed in abduction. Question: What is the magnitude of the difference in radiographic measurement of the acetabular angle between the anteroposterior projections of pelvis in neutral position and with abduction of hips? Methods: 916 radiographic measurements were taken by contrasting the neutral position against those of hip abduction, of patients in our clinic attended between April 1, 2010 and March 31, 2013. Results: T tests were performed for means of two matched samples and a hypothetical difference of the mean of 0.0000 was obtained and the Pearson correlation coefficient for right hip was 0.74427531 and for the left 0.73779866. Using a proposed table of normality of the Acetabular angle according to age, the area was obtained under the curve in a distribution Tgl457 = 0.650 with P = 0.516. The index acetabular in neutral position and with abduction of hips is similar with high statistical significance, according to the analysis of correlation of Pearson. Based on the ROC curve, the acetabular index in frog position has a high sensitivity and specificity. Discussion: Therefore, the measurement of the acetabular index in position with hip abduction, has high reliability to achieve a correct diagnosis.


REFERENCES

  1. Diagnóstico y tratamiento oportuno de la displasia en el desarrollo de cadera. México: Secretaría de Salud; 2008.

  2. Murillo-Quiroga M, Zegarra-Mita H, Castellón-Tamez JL. Displasia de cadera en desarrollo. Rev Paceña Med Fam. 2008; 5(8): 88-91.

  3. http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Displasia [Consultada el 10/05/12].

  4. http://www.portalesmedicos.com/diccionario_medico/index.php/Displasia [Consultada el 10/05/12].

  5. http://www.drscope.com/privados/pac/generales/pdl1/cadera.html [Consultada el 10/05/12].

  6. Alvarado-Brown A. Displasia evolutiva de cadera (DEC). Rev Med Cos Cen. 2009; 66(588): 155-9.

  7. Dezateux C, Brown J, Arthur R, Karnon J, Parnaby A. Performance, treatment pathways, and effects of alternative policy options for screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in the United Kingdom. Arch Dis Child. 2003; 88(9): 753-9.

  8. http://www.encolombia.com/orto12198programa.htm [Consultada el 10/05/12].

  9. Elbourne D, Dezateux C. Hip dysplasia and ultrasound imaging of whole populations: the precautionary principle revisited. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005; 90(1): F2-3.

  10. Harcke HT. The role of ultrasound in diagnosis and management of developmental dysplasia of the hip. Pediatr Radiol. 1995; 25(3): 225-7.

  11. Lowry CA, Donoghue VB, Murphy JF. Auditing hip ultrasound screening of infants at increased risk of developmental dysplasia of the hip. Arch Dis Child. 2005; 90(6): 579-81.

  12. Macnicol MF. Results of a 25-year screening programme for neonatal hip instability. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990; 72(6): 1057-60.

  13. Monge-Bonilla C, Sánchez-Ramírez Adriana, Morales-Alpízar C, Serrano-Aybar P. Diagnóstico tardío de displasia evolutiva de cadera en la población infantil costarricense en el período 1996-2000. Acta Med Costarric. 2002; 44(3): 117-20.

  14. Arce VJD, García BC. Displasia del desarrollo de caderas: ¿radiografía o ultrasonografía? ¿A quiénes y cuándo? Rev Chil Pediatr. 2000; 71(4): 354-6.

  15. Sharp IK. Acetabular dysplasia: the acetabular angle. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1961; 43: 268-72.

  16. Sierra-Rojas L, Fernández Herrera E. Luxación congénita de la cadera. México: Limusa; 1992.

  17. Tachdjian M. Ortopedia pediátrica. Buenos Aires: Editorial Interamericana; 1994, 322-564.

  18. Terver SP, Constine RM, Csongradi J, Kleinman R, Bleck EE. Congenital dislocation of the hip--prognostic implications of early diagnosis. West J Med. 1979; 131(2): 98-103.

  19. Sánchez Ruiz-Cabello J. Cribado de la displasia evolutiva de cadera. Revista Prev Infad. 2002; 30: 28-34.

  20. Stanisavljevic S. Diagnosis and treatment of congenital hip pathology in the newborn. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins Co.; 1964, 94.

  21. Stanisavljevic S, Mitchell CL. Congenital dysplasia, subluxation, and dislocation of the hip in stillborn and newborn infants. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1963; 45: 1147-58.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com