García-Solís E

Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 40-45
PDF size: 90.43 Kb.

ABSTRACT

It has been a constant concern of physcians error in medicina. The physcian, when preparing in the classrooms, is focused main knowledge of the human organism, whether anatomical, biochemical, physiological, embryological, histological, pharmacological, clinical, therapeutic and rehabilitation, in itself 95%, is to prevent, cure, rehabilitate the human being, only 5% or less of his curriculum, considers the ethical aspect of medicine. There is little talk of error or mistakes in medicine. The physcian is human and as such is fallible. The physcian may have errors, either due to deficiency in his training as a student, or as a professional in his education continue or in his humanistic training. But it will seldom do it by commission, but by default. The physcian must have a good scientific-technical, and ethical training. For when an error is made, accept it and from it get the teaching not to repeat again and make it known, perhaps this is the most difficult thing, so that your colleagues do not repeat the error.

REFERENCES

1. Guarner V. Conferencia Dr. Ignacio Chávez. Acerca de la desaparición del arte de curar. Gac Med Mex. 2002; 138 (4): 389-393.

2. Pellegrino ED. La relación entre la autonomía y la integridad en la ética médica. Bol Of Sanit Panam. 1990; 108 (5-6): 379-389.

3. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America; Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, editors. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2000. Available in: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25077248

4. Vázquez R. Bioética y derecho. Fundamentos y problemas actuales. México: Ed. Fontamara; 2012. p. 95.

5. Jurisprudencia 887 de la Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación, publicada en el Apéndice al Seminario Judicial de la Federación, 1917-1995, t. II, materia penal, p. 565.

6. Tamayo C, Sánchez J, Rivera A, Hernández L. La práctica de la medicina y la responsabilidad médica. Rev Med IMSS. 2003; 41 (5): 407-413.

7. Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM, Hebert L, Localio AR, Lawthers AG et al. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. N Engl J Med. 1991; 324 (6): 370-376.

8. Goldman L, Sayson R, Robbins S, Cohn LH, Bettmann M, Weisberg M. The value of the autopsy in three medical eras. N Engl J Med. 1983; 308 (17): 1000-1005.

9. Dubón-Peniche MC. Caso CONAMED. Rev CONAMED. 2010; 15 (1): 57-61.

10. Fajardo-Dolci G, Meljem-Moctezuma J, Rodríguez-Suárez FJ, Zavala-Villavicencio JA, Vicente-González E, Venegas-Páez F et al. Recomendaciones para prevenir el error médico, la mala práctica y la responsabilidad profesional. Rev CONAMED. 2012; 17 (1): 30-43.

11. Ambrosio-Morales MT, Carrillo-Fabela L, González-Mora B. La responsabilidad del médico como servidor público en México. Disponible en: www.juridicas.unam.mx

12. Corral-Castanedo A. Elogio y nostalgia del médico de cabecera. Conmemorativo del 250 aniversario de la fundación de la Real Academia de Medicina y Cirugía de Valladolid. 1981.