medigraphic.com
ISSN 1870-199X (Print)
Órgano oficial de la Facultad de Odontología, UNAM

2018, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Odont Mex 2018; 22 (3)

Dens invaginatus: case report

López HRN, Campos IP, Dávila GG, Camacho HA, Tenorio RF

Language: Spanish
References: 24
Page: 165-169
PDF size: 304.55 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: The Dens Invaginatus or Dens in dent it is the most common dental abnormal structure, this anatomic variation means a true clinic challenge because of its complex anatomy, however , thanks to the auxiliary tools for diagnosis just like Cone Beam Computerized Tomography, we can plan a good treatment to offer the best diagnosis. This article describes a clinic case about Dens in Dent in twenty one tooth with pulp necrosis and asymptomatic apical periodontitis. Cone Beam Computerized Tomography was requested, the image helped to classify the kind of Dens in Dent which is type II according to Oehlers´s classification. It is instrumented, irrigated with ultrasound and sealed with “continuous wave of heat “technique. This technique ensures a radiographic success with six months of evolution. Currently, thanks to diagnostic methods and treatment aids such as ultrasound, gutta-percha injection system more efficient treatments can be offered in endodontic therapeutics.


REFERENCES

  1. Avery JK, Chiego Jr D. Principios de histología y embriología bucal con orientación clínica. 3ª ed. Mosby Elsevier, 2007.

  2. Barzuna-Pacheco M. Dens in dente: dental anomaly difficult to treatment; report of a case. Rev Cient Odontol. 2013; 9 (2): 35-38.

  3. Jung M. Endodontic treatment of dens invaginatus type III with three root canals and open apical foramen. Int Endod J. 2004; 37 (3): 205-213.

  4. Thakur S. Dens invaginatus (tooth within tooth): a review of the literature and diagnostic and management guidelines for practicing dentists. Indian J Dent Sci. 2012; 4 (3): 111-116.

  5. Pai SF, Yang SF, Lin LM. Nonsurgical endodontic treatment of dens invaginatus with large periradicular lesion: a case report. J Endodont. 2004; 30 (8): 597-600.

  6. Hülsmann M. Dens invaginatus: aetiology, classification, prevalence, diagnosis, and treatment considerations. Int Endod J. 1997; 30: 79-90.

  7. Kettunen P, Laurikkala J, Itäranta P, Vainio S, Itoh N, Thesleff I. Associations of FGF-3 and FGF-10 with signaling networks regulating tooth morphogenesis. Dev Dyn. 2000; 219 (3): 322-332.

  8. Ohazama A, Courtney JM, Sharpe PT. Opg, Rank and Rankl in tooth development: coordination of odontogenesis and osteogenesis. J Dent Res. 2004; 83 (3): 241-244.

  9. Campos P, Acosta LS, Tenorio F, de la Fuente-Hernández J. Tratamiento de conductos de un dens invaginatus: reporte de un caso. Univ Odontol. 2012; 31 (66): 215-220.

  10. Oehlers FA. Dens invaginatus II: Associated posterior crown forms and pathogenesis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1957; 10 (12): 1302-1316.

  11. Oehlers FA. Dens invaginatus I: variations of the invagination process and associated anterior crown forms. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1957; 10 (11): 1204-1218 contd.

  12. Omnell KA, Swanbeck G, Lindahl B. Dens invaginatus. II: a microradiographical, histological and micro X-ray diffraction study. Acta Odontol Scand. 1960; 18 (3): 303-330.

  13. Ballal S, Sachdeva GS, Kandaswamy D. Endodontic management of a fused mandibular second molar and paramolar with the aid of spiral computed tomography: a case report. J Endod. 2007; 33 (10): 1247-1251.

  14. Gangwar A, Singal D, Giri KY, Agarwal A, Sruthi SS. An immature type II dens invaginatus in a mandibular lateral incisor with talon’s cusp: a clinical dilemma to confront. Case Rep Dent. 2014; 2014, Article ID 826294, 5 pages.

  15. Gonçalves A, Gonçalves M, Oliveira DP, Gonçalves N. Dens invaginatus type III: report of case and 10 year radiographic follow up. Int Endod J. 2002; 35 (10): 873-879.

  16. Beena VT, Sivakumar R, Heera R, Rajeev R, Choudhary K, Panda S. Radicular dens invaginatus: report of a rare case. Case Rep Dent. 2012; 2012: 871937.

  17. Castelo-Baz P, Martín-Biedma B, Varela-Patiño P. Combined endodontic and surgical management of dens invaginatus in a central maxillary incisor diagnosed by cone beam computed tomography: case report and 2-year follow-up. ENDO Practice Today. 2014; 8 (2): 157-162.

  18. Patel S, Dawood A, Ford TP, Whaites E. The potential applications of cone beam computed tomography in the management of endodontic problems. Int Endod J. 2007; 40 (10): 818-830.

  19. Agrawal PK, Wankhade J, Warhadpande M. A rare case of type III dens invaginatus in a mandibular second premolar and its nonsurgical endodontic management by using cone-beam computed tomography: a case report. J Endod. 2016; 42 (4): 669-672.

  20. Sübay RK, Kayataş M. Dens invaginatus in an immature maxillary lateral incisor: a case report of complex endondontic treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006; 102 (2): e37-41.

  21. Bonsor SJ, Nichol R, Reid MS, Pearson GJ. Microbiological evaluation of photo-activated disinfection in endodontics (an in vivo study). Br Dent J. 2006; 200 (6): 337-341.

  22. Sigrist De Martin A, Da Silveira Bueno CE, Sandhes Cunha R, Aranha de Araújo R, Fernandes de Magalhães Silveira C. Endodontic treatment of dens invaginatus with a periradicular lesion: case report. Aust Endod J. 2005; 31 (3): 123-125.

  23. Anderson P, Tanomaru Mario, Renato R, Chavez GM, GuerreiroJM. Apexification with white MTA in an immature permanent tooth with dens invaginatus. Braz J Oral Sci. 2013; 12 (1): 61-65.

  24. De Smit A, Demaut L. Nonsurgical endodontic treatment of invaginated teeth. J Endodont. 1982; 8 (11): 506-511.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com