González-Vergara C

Language: Spanish
References: 22
Page: 89-92
PDF size: 72.50 Kb.

ABSTRACT

This article presents the wide variety ways of assessment for breast lesions requiring percutaneous biopsy or preoperative needle localization according to the precepts stablished by de American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS).

REFERENCES

1. Sickles E. Breast Imaging: From 1965 to the Present. Radiology 2000; 215: 1-16. RSNA 2000.

2. Morrow M. The certainities and the uncertainities of ductal carcinoma in situ. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2004; 90(6): 424-425.

3. Compendio de Cáncer 2000. Secretaría de Salud. México.

4. Orel S, Kay N, Reynolds C, Sullivan D. BI-RADS categorization as a predictor of malignancy. Radiology 1992; 211: 845-850.

5. Taplin S, Ichikawa L, Kerlikowske K et al. Concordance of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System assessments and management recommendations in screening mammography. Radiology 2002; 222: 529-535.

6. Berg W, Campassi C et al. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Inter-and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. AJR 2000; 174: 1769-1777.

7. Lehman C, Holt S, Peacock S et al. Use of the American College of Radiology BI-RADS guidelines by community radiologists: Concordance of assessments and recommendations assigned to screening mammograms. AJR 2002; 179: 15-20.

8. Geller B, Barlow W, Ballard-Barbash R et al. Use of the American College of Radiology BI-RADS to report on the mammographic evaluation of women with signs and symptoms of breast disease. Radiology 2002; 222: 536-542.

9. Sickles EA. Periodic mammographic follow-up probably benign lesions: results in 3,184 consecutive cases. Radiology 1991; 179: 463-468.

10. Varas X, Leborgne F, Leborgne JH. Nonpalpable probably benign lesions: role of follow-up mammography. Radiology 1992; 184: 409-414.

11. Rosen EL, Baker JA, Soo MS. Malignant lesions initially subject to short-term mammographic follow-up. Radiology 2002; 223: 221-223.

12. Hall FM. Malignancy in BI-RADS category 3 mammographic lesions. Radiology 2002; 225: 918-920.

13. Radiology Info. The Radiology information resource for patients. Radiological Society of North America, Inc. April 2004.

14. March D, Coughlin B, Barhan R et al. Breast masses: Removal of all US evidence during biopsy by using a handheld vacuum-assisted device-initial experience. Radiology 2003; 227: 549-555.

15. Parker SH, Lovin JD, Jobe WE et al. Stereotactic breast biopsy with a biopsy gun. Radiology 1990; 176: 741-747.

16. Parker SH, Jobe WE, Dennis MA et al. US guided automated large-core breast biopsy. Radiology 1993; 187: 507-511.

17. Burbank F, Parker SH, Fogarty TJ. Stereotactic breast biopsy: improved tissue harvesting with the mammotome. Am Surg 1996; 63: 738-744.

18. Lee C, Carter D, Philpotts LE et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed with stereotactic core needle biopsy: Can invasion be predicted? Radiology 2002; 217: 466-470.

19. Fishman JE, Milikowsky C et al. US-guided corre-needle biopsy of the breast: How many specimens are necessary? Radiology 2003; 226: 779-782.

20. Soo MS, Baker JA, Rosen EL, Thuy TV. Sonographically guided biopsy of suspicious microcalcifications of the breast. AJR 2002; 178: 1007-1015.

21. Liberman L, Kaplan J et al. Bracketing wires for preoperative breast needle localization. AJR 2000; 177: 565-572.

22. Lo J, Markey M, Baker J, Floyd C Jr. Cross institutional evaluation of BI-RADS predictive model for mammographic diagnosis of breast cancer. AJR 2002; 178: 457-463.