medigraphic.com
ISSN 0016-3813 (Print)

2001, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Gac Med Mex 2001; 137 (4)

Bioethics and Scientific Formation of the Physician

Aréchiga H

Language: Spanish
References: 110
Page: 375-386
PDF size: 104.55 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Bioethics is becoming a major current in modern medical thought and action. Given the youth of this field of enquiry, there are still important debates and controversies on its proper role in medicine and in medical education, but the need to foster its integral incorporation into the formative process of the physician is unreservedly accepted, on an equal footing with the scientific, technical, and humanistic components of medical training.


REFERENCES

  1. Lolas FI. Bioethics in the context of global health. Pan Am J Publc Health 1999;6:6568.

  2. Reich WT. Encyclopedia of bioethics. New York: Macmillan; 1995.

  3. Kuhse H, Singer P, editors. A companion to bioethics. Malden, MA, USA: Blackwell; 1998.

  4. Kuthy Porter J, Vilialobos Pérez J, Tarasco Michel M, Yamamoto Cortés M. Introducción a la bioética. México, D.F.: Méndez Editores; 1997.

  5. Callahan S. In good conscience: reason and emotion in moral decision making. San Francisco, CA, USA: Harper; 1991.

  6. Macklin R. Against relativism: cultural diversity and the search for ethical universals in medicine. New York: Oxford University Press; 1999.

  7. Mulier JH. Anthropology, bioethics, and medicine: a provocative trilogy. Med Anthropol 1992;8:460-470.

  8. Good MJ. Cultural studies of biomedicine: an agenda for research. Soc Sci Med 1995;41:461-473.

  9. Churchill LR. Are we professionals? A critical look at the social role of bioethicists. Daedalus 1999;128:253-274.

  10. Daniels N, Kennedy BP, Kawachi I. Why justice is good for our health: the social determinants of health inequalities. Daedalus 1999;128:215-251.

  11. Rosenberg CE. Meanings, policies, and medicine: on the bioethical enterprise and history. Daedalus 1999;128:27-46.

  12. Davis D, Zoloth L. Notes from a narrow ridge: religion and bioethics. Hagerstown, MD, USA: University Publishing Group; 1999.

  13. Rothman DJ. Strangers at the bedside: a history of how law and bioethics transformed medical decision making. New York: Basic Books; 1991.

  14. Breen KJ, Pluekhan VD, Cordner SM. Ethics, law and medical practice. St. Leonards, Australia: Alien & Unwin; 1997.

  15. Ashcroft R, et al. Teaching medical ethics and law within medical education: a model for the UK core curriculum. J Med Ethics 1998;24:189-192.

  16. Toulmin S. How medicine saved the life of ethics. Perspect Biol Med 1982;25:736-750.

  17. Velasco Suárez M, et al. Bioética y humanización de las ciencias médicas. Gac Med Mex 1993;129:403-416.

  18. Callahan D. The Hastings Center and the early years of bioethics. Kennedy Instit Ethics J 1999;9:53-71.

  19. Bosk CL. Professional ethicist available: logical, secular, friendly. Daedalus 1999;128:47-68.

  20. Le Porrier H. El médico de Córdoba. México: Grijalbo; 1988.

  21. Alvarez Amézquita J, Bustamante ME, López Picazos A, Fernández del Castillo F. Historia de la salubridad y de la asistencia en México. Secretaría de Salubridad y Asistencia, México, V. l, 1960.

  22. Avila HR. El tribunal del protomedicato en Nueva España, su organización administrativa. Bol Mex Hist Fil Med 1987;X:13-22.

  23. Annas GJ, Grodin MA. editors. The Nazi doctors and the Nurenberg Code: human rights in human experimentation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1992.

  24. De Solla Price D, De Solla Price DJ. Little science, big science... and beyond. New York: Columbia University Press; 1986.

  25. Institute of Scientific Information. Inc. Science Citation Index. Philadelphia, PA, USA: 1999.

  26. Aréchiga H. La expansión del conocimiento científico y las especialidades médicas. Gac Med Mex 1997;133:85-88.

  27. Chávez I. La moral médica frente a la medicina de nuestro tiempo. En Chávez I. ed. Humanismo médico, educación y cultura. México: El Colegio Nacional; 1978.

  28. Benítez-Bribiesca L, Aréchiga H. De la medicina a las ciencias de la salud. En: Aréchiga H. y Benítez-Bribiesca L. (Coordinadores). Un siglo de ciencias de la salud en México. Fondo de Cultura Económica; 2000. p. 367-397.

  29. National Academy of Sciences. Observations on the President's Fiscal Year 2000. Federal Science and Technology Budget. Washington D.C. USA: 1999.

  30. Comisión Nacional de Derechos Humanos, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México y Academia Nacional de Medicina. La responsabilidad profesional del médico y los derechos humanos. México, D.F.: 1995.

  31. Aréchiga H, Cereijido M. Coordinadores. El envejecimiento. México: Siglo XXI Editores: 1999.

  32. Kumate J. Sobre el envejecimiento. Rev Fac Med UNAM 2000;43:28-30.

  33. Emanuel LL. Facing requests for physician-assisted suicide: toward a practical and principled clinical skill set. JAMA 1998;280:643-647.

  34. Meier DE, et al. A national survey of physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia in the United States. N Engl J Med 1998;338:1193-201.

  35. Tulsky JA, Ciampa R, Rosen EJ. Responding to legal requests for physician-assisted suicide. Ann Int Med 2000;132:494-499.

  36. Faber-Langendoen K, Karlawish JHT. Should assisted suicide be only physician-assisted? Ann Int Med 2000;132:482-487.

  37. Swarte NB, Heintz PM. Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. Ann Med 1999;31:364-371.

  38. Miller FG, Fins JJ, Snyder LJD. Assisted suicide compared with refusal of treatment: a valid distinction? Ann Int Med 2000;132:470-475.

  39. Pellegrino ED. Decisions to withdraw life-sustaining treatment: a moral algorithm. JAMA 2000;183:1065-1067.

  40. Caplan AL, Snyder LJD, Faber-Langendoen K. The role of guidelines in the practice of physician-assisted suicide. Ann Int Med 2000;132:476-481.

  41. Dickinson GE, Mermann AC. Death education in U.S. medical schools. Acad Med 1996;71:1348-1349.

  42. Field MJ, Cossel CK. Approaching death. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences; 1997.

  43. Asch A. Prenatal diagnosis and selectiva abortion: a chalienge to practice and policy. Am J Publc Health 1999;89:1649-1657.

  44. Careaga Pérez G, Figueroa JG, Mejía MC. Ética y salud reproductiva. México, D.F.: UNAM-Editorial Porrúa; 1996.

  45. De la Fuente F, Soondergaard F, Fonnest G, Vedsted-Jacobsen A. Attitudes among health care professionals on the ethics of assisted reproductive technologies and legal abortion. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000;79:49-53.

  46. Vázquez R. Etica y clonación. Ciencia 1998;49 (2):5-10.

  47. Wolf DP, Meng L, Ely J, Stouffer RL. Recent progress in mammalian cloning. J Assoc Repr Genet 1998:15: 235-239.

  48. Scheper-Hughes N. Theft of life: the globalization of organ stealing rumors. Anthropol Today 1996;12:3-11.

  49. Marshali PA, Daar AS. Cultural and psychological dimensions of human organ transplantation. Ann Transpl 1998;3:7-11.

  50. Deschamps JY, Chaillous L, Gouin E, Saï P. Acceptability of pig xenografts by patients with type 1 diabetes and general population. Diabetes Care 2000;23:412-414.

  51. Nolan TW. Systems changes to improve patients safety. Br Med J 2000;320:771-773.

  52. Lifshitz A, Loredo Sánchez F, Halabe-Cherem J. Hacia una categorización de la yatrogénesis. Gac Med Mex 1988;124:43-46.

  53. Blumenthal D. Ethics issues in academic-industry relationships in the life sciences: the continuing debate. Acad Med 1996;71:1291-1296.

  54. Kodish E, Whitehouse P, Murray T. Conflict of interest in university-industry research relationships: realities, politics and values. Acad Med 1996;71:1287-1290.

  55. Lemmens TL. Bioethics for clinicians: 17. Conflict of interest in research, education and patient care. CMAJ 1998;159:960-965.

  56. Weijer C, Dickens B, Meslin E. Bioethics for clinicians: 10. Research ethics. CMAJ 1997;156:1153-1157.

  57. Oldham JM, Haimowitz S, Delano SJ. Protection of persons with mental disorders from research risk: a response to the report of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Arch Gen Psych 1999;56:688-693.

  58. Velasco Suárez M, et al. Orientaciones éticas para una buena práctica neuroquirúrgica. Arch Neurocien 1999;4:110-116.

  59. Zigmond MJ, et al. Responsible conduct regarding scientific communication. J Neurosci 2000;20(1):i-xiv.

  60. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Protection of human subjects: informed consent and waiver of informed consent requirements in certain emergency research; final rules. October 2, 1996.

  61. House Govemment Reform and Oversight Committee. U.S. House of Representatives. Hearings: Clinical Trials and Patient Safety, Washington, DC.: U.S. House of Representatives, April 22, 1998.

  62. Moreno J, Caplan AL, Wolpe R. Updating protections for human subjects involved in research. JAMA 1998;280: 1951-1958.

  63. Miller FG, Rosenstein DL, De Renzo EG. Professional integrity in clinical research. JAMA 1998;280:1449-1454.

  64. Reinhard V. Comfortable quarters for laboratory animals, Washington DC. USA: Animal Welfare Institute; 1997.

  65. Bekoff M, Corron M. An encyclopedia of animal rights and animal welfare. London: Fitzroy Dearborn; 1998.

  66. Jennings M, Hawkins P. Developing the ethics component of the UK modular training system for laboratory animal scientists, ALASA Workshop Report. Animal Welfare 1998;7:445-458.

  67. Aréchiga H. El uso de animales en el laboratorio de experimentación. Elementos 1999;36:13-17.

  68. Dol M, Vlissingen MF. van Kasanmoentalib S, Visser T, Zwart H. Recognizing the intrinsic value of animals. Beyond welfare. Van Gorcum, The Netherlands: Assen; 1999.

  69. Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería y Desarrollo Rural. Proyecto de Norma Oficial Mexicana. Proy.-Nom-062-200-1999. Especificaciones técnicas para la producción, cuidado y uso de los animales de laboratorio. Diario Oficial, Diciembre 6, 1999.

  70. Collins F, et al. The Human Genome Project. Science 1997;278:541-568.

  71. Marshali E, Pennisi E, Roberts L. In the crossfire: Collins on genomes patents, and rivalry. Science 2000;287:2396-2398.

  72. Rawbone RG. Future impact of genetic screening in occupational and environmental medicine. Occup Environ Med 1999;56:721-724.

  73. Thomas SM. Genomics: the implications for ethics and education, Br Med Bull 1999;55:429-445.

  74. Lisker R, Carnevale A, Villa JA, Armendares S, Wertz DC. Mexican geneticists opinions on disclosure issues. Clin Genet 1998;54:321-339.

  75. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 4 th Oxford University Press; 1994.

  76. Christakis NA. Ethics are local: engaging cross-cultural variation in the ethics for clinical research. Soc Sci Med 1992;35:1079-1091.

  77. Christakis NA. Prognostication and bioethics. Daedalus 1999;128:197-214.

  78. Cassell J. Against medical ethics: opening the can of worms. J Med Ethics 1998;24:812.

  79. Seedhouse D. Against medical ethics: a response to Casseli. J Med Ethics 1998;24:13-17.

  80. Rodríguez Ortega G, Rojas Russell MI. coord. La psicología de la salud en América Latina. México: Ed. Porrúa, 1998.

  81. Gervais KG, Priester R, Vawter DE, Otte KK, Soiberg MM. editors. Ethical challenges in managed care: a casebook. Washington, D.C. USA: Georgetown University Press; 1999.

  82. Hundert EM, Douglas-Steele D, Bickei J. Context in medical education: the informal ethics curriculum. Med Educ 1996;30:353-364.

  83. Gustafson JF. Ethics: an American growth industry. Key Reporter (Phi Beta Kappa) 1991;56:1-5.

  84. Price J, Price D, Williams G, Hoffenberg R. Changes in medical student attitudes as they progress through a medical course. J Med Ethics 1998;24:110-117.

  85. Doyal L, Gilion R. Medical ethics and law as a core subject in medical education: a core curriculum offers flexibility in how it is taught-but not that it is taught. Br Med J 1998;316:1623-1624.

  86. Pérez Tamayo R. Notas sobre la ignorancia médica y otros ensayos. México: El Colegio Nacional; 1991. p. 237-256.

  87. Aréchiga H. La ética en la investigación médica. Rev Mex Dermatol 1996;40:99100.

  88. De la Fuente R. Medicina y valores humanos. En: La educación médica y la salud en México. de la Fuente JR y Rodríguez-Carranza R, Coordinadores. México: Siglo XXI Editores; 1996.

  89. Aréchiga H. La biomedicina y los médicos del futuro. Rev Fac Med UNAM 1993;36:77-81.

  90. Russell B. The impact of science on society. London: Unwin Paperbacks; 1976.

  91. Lloyd GER. Hippocratic writings. Pelican Classics. London: Pelican Books; 1978.

  92. Fox RC. Is medical education asking too much of bioethics? Daedalus 1999;128:125.

  93. Hodge JG Jr, Gostin LO, Jacobson PD. Legal issues concerning electronic health information: privacy, quality and liability. JAMA 1999;282:1466-1471.

  94. Myser C, Kerridge IH, Mitcheli KR. Ethical reasoning and decision-making: assessing the process. Med Educ 1995;29:29-33.

  95. Hili AV. The ethical dilemma of science. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1960.

  96. Bronowski J. The common sense of science. New York; Vintage Books; 1968.

  97. Stelfox HT, Chua G, O'Rourke K, Detsky AS. Conflict of interest in the debate over calcium-channel antagonists. N Engl J Med 1998;338:101-105.

  98. Fox E, Arnold RM, Brody B. Medical ethics education. past, present, future. Acad Med 1995;70:761-769.

  99. Swenson SL, Rothstein JA. Navigating the wards: teaching medical students to use their moral compasses. Acad Med 1996;71:591-594.

  100. Fulford KWM, Yates A, Hope T. Ethics and the GMC core curriculum: a survey of resources in UK medical schools. J Med Ethics 1997;23:82-87.

  101. Coles R. The moral education of medical students. Acad Med 1998;73:55-57.

  102. Kane GC, Leone FT, Rowane J, Fish JE. Nationwide perspective on the use of a formal ethics curriculum during critical care fellowship training. Acad Med 1998;73:103.

  103. Goldie J. Review of ethics curricula in undergraduate medical education. Med Educ 2000;34:108-119.

  104. Feudtner CH, Christakis DA, Christakis NA. Do clinical clerks suffer ethical erosion? Students' perception of their ethical environment and personal development. Acad Med 1994;69:670-679.

  105. Christakis DA, Feudtner C. Temporary matters: the ethical consequences of transient social relationships in medical training. JAMA 1997;278:739-743.

  106. Rappleye WC. Medical education: final report of the Commission on Medical Education. New York: Association of American Medical Colleges; 1932.

  107. Hafferty FW, Franks R. The hidden curriculum, ethics teaching and the structure of medical education. Acad Med 1994;64:861-871.

  108. Ross RH, Fineberg HV. Innovations in physician education: the process and pattern of reform in North American medical schools. New York: Springer Publishing Co; 1996.

  109. De Angelis CD , editors. The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Curriculum for the Twenty-First Century. Baltimore, MD, USA: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1999.

  110. Coughlin S, Katz WH, Mattison DR. Ethics instruction at schools of public health in the United States. Am J Public Health 1999;89:768-770.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com