medigraphic.com
Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía

2018, Number 1

Next >>

Arch Neurocien 2018; 23 (1)

Normative data of the Cambridge Mindreading test in spanish for young adults in the city of Barranquilla, Colombia

Barceló-Martínez E, Fonseca-Consuegra L, Aguirre-Acevedo DC, Gelves-Ospina M, Roman NF, Benítez- Agudelo JC

Language: Spanish
References: 34
Page: 6-15
PDF size: 430.03 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The Cambridge Mindreading Test - CAM is one of the most used instruments in the assessment of social cognition and the Theory of Mind (ToM). However, despite being widely used in the evaluation of these skills, there are very few studies that inquires into the normative scores in the Spanish-speaking population. The aim of this paper is to present the normative data of the Cambridge Mindreading Test-CAM, in a population of young adults in the city of Barranquilla, Colombia. 384 healthy subjects taken from the general population between 18 and 35 years old, were evaluated through the Cambridge Mindreading Test - CAM in its 50 ítems Spanish version adapted by the Escuela Argentina de Neurociencias. Average scores are obtained according to level of schooling, gender and socioeconomic status. The general average score of correct answers obtained for the CAM-Test, was of 29.40 with standard deviation of 5.69. No significant differences were observed according to gender and socioeconomic status. Specific scores were obtained according to socioeconomic status and gender.
The normative data of the CAM-Test in its Spanish version for the population of young adults are provided, from the evaluation of subjects without pathologies, according to level of schooling, gender and socioeconomic status.


REFERENCES

  1. 1.Román F, Rojas G, Román N, Iturry M, Blanco R, Leis A, et al. Baremos del test de la mirada en español, en adultos normales de Buenos Aires. Rev Neuropsicol Latinoam 2012; 4 (3): 1-5.

  2. 2.Brekke JS, Kay D, Lee K, Green MF. Biosocial pathways to functional outcome in schizophrenia: a path analytic model. Schizophr Res 2005; 80: 213-25.

  3. 3.Penn DL, Ritchie M, Francis J, Combs D, Martin J. Social perception in schizophrenia: the role of context. Psychiatry Res 2005; 109: 149-59.

  4. 4.León, DA. Introducción a la Cognición Social y la Neurociencia Social Cognitiva. Contextos 2013; 1: 1-11.

  5. 5.Bresó E, Ferrer A, Giorgi G. MEIT (Mobile Emotional Intelligence Test): Una novedosa metodología para evaluar la percepción de emociones haciendo uso de dispositivos móviles. Ansiedad y estrés 2013; 19(2-3): 185-200.

  6. 6.Gómez M, Molina D, Arana M. Teoría de la mente en un grupo de personas vinculadas al conflicto armado y en proceso de resocialización. Rev Colomb de Ciencias Sociales 2013; 4 (2): 238-251.

  7. 7.Hernández R, Fernández C, Baptista P. Metodología de la Investigación, 5ta. México: McGraw Hill; 2014.

  8. 8.Montero I, León O. A guide for naming research studies in Psychology. Int J Clin Health Psychol 2007; 7: 847-62.

  9. 9.Golan O, Baron-Cohen S, & Hill J. The Cambridge Mindreading (CAM) Face- Voice Battery: Testing Complex Emotion Recognition in adults with and without Asperger Syndrome. J Autism Dev Disord 2006; 36:169-83.

  10. 10.Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, et. al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005; 53(4): 695-699.

  11. 11.Henríquez G, Barriga O. El rombo de la Investigación. Cinta de Moebio 2005; 23: 1-8.

  12. 12.Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, segunda edición. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988.

  13. 13.Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull 1992; 112: 155–9.

  14. 14.Ibáñez A, Petroni A, Urquina H, Torrente F, Torralva T, Hurtado E, et al. Cortical Déficits of Emotional Face Procesing in Adults with ADHD: Its Relation to Social Cognition and Executive Function. Soc Neurosci 2014; 6: 464-81.

  15. 15.Herzig D, Sullivan S, Evans J, Corcoran R, Mohr C. Hemispheric asymmetry and theory of mind: Is there an association? Cogn Neuropsychiatry 2012; 17: 371-96.

  16. 16.Hall CW, Gaul L, Kent M. College students’ perception of facial expression. Percept Mot Skills 1999; 89 (3): 763-70.

  17. 17.Hall JA. Gender, gender roles, and nonverbal communication skills: 32-67. En: Rosenthal R. (Ed.), Skill in nonverbal communication 1979; Cambridge, England: Oelgeschlager, Gunn and Hain.

  18. 18.Fulton EK, Bulluck M, Hertzog C. Orienting to face expression during encoding improves men’s recognition of own gender faces. Acta Psychol (Amst) 2015; 161: 18-24. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.08.005

  19. 19.Demenescu LR, Mathiak KA, y Mathiak K. Age and gender related variations of emotion recognition in pseudowords and faces. Exp. Aging Res 2014; 40 (2). 187-207. doi:10.1080/0361073X.2014.882210

  20. 20.Thompson AE, Voyer D. Sex differences in the ability to recognize non-verbal displays of emotion: A meta-analysis. Cogn Emot 2014; 28: 1164-1195. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2013.875889

  21. 21.Oyuela R, Pardo CF.Diferencias de género en el reconocimiento de expresiones facials emocionales. Univ Psychol 2003; 2 (2): 151-16.

  22. 22.McClure EB. A meta-analytic review of sex differences in facial expression processing and their development in infants, children and adolescents. Psychol Bull 2000; 126 (3): 424-53.

  23. 23.Tiedens LZ. Anger and Advancement versus sadness and subjugation: The effect of negative emotion expressions on social status conferral. J Pers Soc Psychol 2001; 80 (1): 86-94.

  24. 24.Ruiz-Ibáñez A, Boyano J. Diferencias de género en el reconocimiento de caras emocionales: ¿son los hombre menos eficientes? Interacciones 2017; 3 (2): 67-77. doi: 10.24016/2017.v3n2.55

  25. 25.De Carvalho B, Barros N, Filgueiras A, Pereira M, Stingel A.Diferenças de gênero entre universitários no reconhecimento de expressões faciais emocionais. Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana 2013; 31(1):200-22.

  26. 26.Scherer KR, Scherer U. Assesing the ability to recognize facial ad vocal expressions of emotion: Construction and validation of the emotion recognition index. J Nonverbal Behav 2011; 35: 305-326. doi:10.1007/s10919-011-0115-4

  27. 27.Narambuena L, Vaiman M, Pereno L. Reconocimiento de emociones facials en adultos mayores de la ciudad de Córdoba. Psykhe 2016; 25 (1): 1-13

  28. 28.Hyde JS. The gender similarities hypothesis. Psychologist 2005; 60 (6): 581-92.

  29. 29.Baron-Cohen S. The autistic child’s theory of mind: a case of specific developmental delay. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 1989; 30: 285-97.

  30. 30.Gregory C, Lough S, Stone, VE, Erzinclioglu S, Martin L, Baron-Cohen S, et al. Theory of mind in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease: Theoretical and practical implications. Brain 2002; 125: 752-64.

  31. 31.Stone, VE, Baron-Cohen S, Knight RT. Frontal lobe contributions to theory of mind. J Cogn Neurosci 1998; 10: 640-56.

  32. 32.Baron-Cohen S, O’Riordan M, Jones R, Stone VE, Plaisted K. A new test of social sensitivity: detection of faux pas in normal children and children with Asperger syndrome. J Autism and Devel Disorders 1999; 29: 407-418.

  33. 33.Ortega H, Tirapu J, Lopez J. Valoración de la Cognición Social en Esquizofrenia a través del test de la mirada: Implicaciones para su rehabilitación. Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana 2012; 30: 39-51.

  34. 34.Gómez M, Arango E, Molina D, Barceló E. Características de la teoría en el trastorno disocial de la conducta. Psicología desde el Caribe. 2010; 26: 103-118.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com