2018, Number 1
<< Back Next >>
Acta Ortop Mex 2018; 32 (1)
Comparison of the functional outcomes of patients with arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff ruptures alone or combined with acromioplasty or biceps tenotomy
Ríos-Fak J, Olivos-Meza A, Sierra-Suárez L, Almazán-Díaz A, Pérez-Jiménez F, Cruz-López F
Language: Spanish
References: 14
Page: 17-21
PDF size: 193.48 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Background: The rotator cuff
injury it is one of the most common causes of pain
and functional disability of the shoulder with an
annual reported incidence of 4.5 million cases in
the United States. It is one of the leading causes of
pain of shoulder in patients older than 60 years.
In Mexico, there are no reports of the incidence
or the results of arthroscopic repair of massive
rotator cuff lesions alone or combined with other
procedures.
Objective: To evaluate the clinical
evolution of patients post-surgery of arthroscopic
rotator cuff massive injury repair AR-RCMI alone
or in combination with other techniques.
Methods: Evaluation of records of patients with AR-RCMI
post-surgery, comparing the results of the scales:
simple shoulder test and VAS before and after
surgery with a follow up of 2.6 years. The combined
procedures were acromioplasty, tenotomy of
biceps or both.
Results: 65 patients with diagnosis
of massive injury; with an average age of 62.8
years (SD ± 9. 42), 27.7% were men and 72.3%
women. The evaluation was conducted in four
groups: arthroscopic repair (AR); arthroscopic
repair + biceps tenotomy (AR + BT); arthroscopic
repair + acromioplasty (AR + A) and arthroscopic
repair + biceps tenotomy + acromioplasty (AR + BTA). All groups showed significant reduction in
pain: AR (-44.1%, p = 0.0001), AR + A (-36.9%, p
= 0.001), AR + BT (-36.3%, p = 0.0001), AR + BT +
A (-38.5%, p = 0.0001). All groups had significant
improvement in function with the SST scale.
REFERENCES
Oh LS, Wolf BR, Hall MP, Levy BA, Marx RG: Indications for rotator cuff repair: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007; 455: 52-63.
Abrams JS: Arthroscopic techniques for massive rotator cuff repairs. Tech Shoulder Elb Surg. 2007; 8(3): 126-34.
Ellman H, Kay SP, Wirth M: Arthroscopic treatment of full-thickness rotator cuff tears: 2- to 7-year follow-up study. Arthroscopy. 1993; 9(2): 195-200.
Angelo R: The arthroscopic management of large to massive rotator cuff tears. Tech Shoulder Elb Surg. 2008; 9(4): 226-36.
Fukuda H, Mikasa M, Yamanaka K: Incomplete thickness rotator cuff tears diagnosed by subacromial bursography. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987; (223): 51-8.
Kang JR, Gupta R: Mechanisms of fatty degeneration in massive rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012; 21(2): 175-80.
Anley CM, Chan SK, Snow M: Arthroscopic treatment options for irreparable rotator cuff tears of the shoulder. World J Orthop. 2014; 5(5): 557-65.
Sarmento M: Long head of biceps: from anatomy to treatment. Acta Reumatol Port. 2015; 40(1): 26-33.
Kempf JF, Gleyze P, Bonnomet F, Walch G, Mole D, Frank A, et al: A multicenter study of 210 rotator cuff tears treated by arthroscopic acromioplasty. Arthroscopy. 1999; 15(1): 56-66.
Wang E, Wang L, Gao P, Li Z, Zhou X, Wang S: Single-versus doublerow arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in massive tears. Med Sci Monit. 2015; 21: 1556-61.
Mook WR, Greenspoon JA, Millett PJ: Arthroscopic double-row transosseous equivalent rotator cuff repair with a knotless selfreinforcing technique. Open Orthop J. 2016; 10: 286-95.
Van der Zwaal P, Pool LD, Hacquebord ST, van Arkel ER, van der List MP: Arthroscopic side-to-side repair of massive and contracted rotator cuff tears using a single uninterrupted suture: the shoestring bridge technique. Arthroscopy. 2012; 28(6): 754-60.
Neri BR, Chan KW, Kwon YW: Management of massive and irreparable rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009; 18(5): 808-18.
Kolk A, Wolterbeek N, Auw Yang KG, Zijl JA, Wessel RN: Predictors of disease-specifi c quality of life after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Int Orthop. 2016; 40(2): 323-9.