Zavaleta-Landa JM, Sánchez-Portillo J, Gutiérrez-Espinosa DL, Martínez RD

Language: Spanish
References: 6
Page: 130-132
PDF size: 316.43 Kb.

ABSTRACT

In the analysis of pelvic disease female patients, ultrasound is routinely used as the main diagnostic tool. Among the different etiologies are the masses at ovarian level. The expert studies show a high degree of certainty in the findings from which proposes a probable diagnosis based on imaging presentation; within the various lesions observed at annexes level, there is a wide variety of pathologies. This is a review of the main features found in studies of pelvic ultrasound guidance at its benign or malignant, which were analyzed for categorization under a probable diagnosis and the corresponding prognosis.

REFERENCES

1. Berek & Novak’s Gynecology. Benign Diseases of the Female Reproductive Tract. 14th Edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007, p. 440.

2. Danforth’s Obstetrics and Gynecology. Gynecologic Ultrasound. 10th Ed., Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008, p. 547.

3. Brown DL, Dudiak KM, Laing FC. Adnexal Masses. US Characerization and Reporting Radiology. Radiology 2010; 254(2): 342-54.

4. Peh WCG, Khong PL, Yin Y, Ho W, Evans NS, Gilula LA, et al. Imaging of Pelvic In- sufficiency tu1, Scientific Exhibit 1996; 16(2): 335-348. Publicación en línea, consultada y disponible en: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/14242061_Imaging_ of_pelvic_insufficiency_fractures.

5. Kenneth J, Strully MD, Saul Heiser MD. Lumbar and Sacral Cysts of Meningeal Origin. Radiology 1954; 62: 544-9

6. Diel J, Ortiz O, Losada RA, Price DB, Hayt MW, Katz DS. The sacrum: pathologic spectrum, multimodality imaging, and subspecialty approach. Radiographics 2001; 21(1): 83-104.