medigraphic.com
ISSN 8541-3697 (Print)

2018, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

AbanicoVet 2018; 8 (2)

Use of poultry by-products as a protein source in the preparation of ruminant diets

Cabrera-Núñez A, Daniel-Renteria I, Martínez-Sánchez C, Alarcón-Pulido S, Rojas-Ronquillo R, Velázquez–Jiménez S

Language: Spanish
References: 18
Page: 59-67
PDF size: 496.86 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of poultry by-products, on the weight gain and yield of the carcass, under a stabling system. 30 Cebu x Swiss heifers, weighing approximately 300 kg and 30 months of age were used, which were assigned, to a completely randomized design in three treatments. T1, (control) energy concentrate; T2, energy concentrate + 30% Poultry manure and T3, energy concentrate + 30% poultry meal. The composition of the energy concentrate was based on ground sorghum, corn grain, wheat bran, ground bales and salt blocks of minerals. Each treatment was offered twice a day at a rate of 3% of the live weight for 90 days. The average daily weight gain (p ≤ 0.05) was .964, 1.04, 1.15 kg / animal, respectively. A significant effect (p ≤ 0.05) was observed on the percentage of yield of the channel of 47.02; 49.08 and 52.03%, for T1, T2, and T3, respectively. The results indicate that supplementation based on poultry meal promoted a higher productive-yield in heifers supplemented under a stabling system.


REFERENCES

  1. ABDUL-KALIL HPS, Siti-Alwani M, Mohd-Omar AK. 2006. Chemical composition, anatomy, lignin distribution and cell wall structure of Malaysian plant waste fibers. BioResources 1(2):220-232. http://ojs.cnr.ncsu.edu/index.php/BioRes/article/view/BioRes_01_2_220_232_AbdulKahlil_SM_Chemical_ Composition_Mayalsian_Plant_Fibers/128

  2. BISHOP CD, Angus RA, Watts SA. 1995. The use of feather meal as a replacement for fishmeal in the diet of Oreochromis niloticus fry. Bioresource Technology. 54: 291-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-8524(95)00146-8

  3. BRUNTON EW. 2012. Animal waste management an industry perspective. American Society of Agricultural. ISSN 2151-0040; DOI: 10.13031/ISSN.2151-0032.

  4. CASTAÑEDA FEA, Monrroy AVJ. 2010. Métodos de procesamiento de subproductos agrícolas para elevar su valor nutricional. Centro de ganadería, Colegio de posgraduados. Chapingo, México. ISBN 978-607-715-083.

  5. GÓMEZ AR. 2006. Harinas de origen animal. En: Shimada AS, Rodríguez FG, Cuaron JA (Ed.). Engorda de ganado bovino en corral. Consultores en Producción Animal, S. C. México. ISBN 6071701228.

  6. GÓMEZ AR. 2009. Harinas de origen animal. En: Shimada AS, Rodríguez FG, Cuaron JA (Ed.). Engorda de ganado bovino en corral. Consultores en Producción Animal, S. C. México. ISBN 6071701228.

  7. GUTIÉRREZ F, Rojas A, Dormond H, Poore H, WingChing R. 2013. Características nutricionales y fermentativas de mezclas ensiladas de desechos de piña y avícolas. Agron. Costarricense 27(1):79-89. ISSN 2215-3608.

  8. INEGI. 2010. Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática. Anuario Estadístico por entidad federativa, México. ISBN-13: 978-0309317023.

  9. MADRID A. 1999. Aprovechamiento de los subproductos cárnicos. 1ª ed. Madrid España. Edit. Acribia, pp. 35-43. ISBN 978-84-200-0856-1.

  10. NACIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL (NRC). 2007. Requerimientos Nutritivos para rumiantes en Engorda. 7th Edition Natl. Acad. Washington. D.C. p. 11-34. ISBN 13: 978- 0309317023.

  11. OCKERMAN HW, Hanen CL. 2005. Industrialización de subproductos de origen animal. Editorial Acribia. Zaragoza; España. p.123-234. ISBN: 9788420007519

  12. ORSKOV ER. 1995. In: Better utilization of crop residues and byproducta in animal feeding: Research Guidelínes. 1. State of Knowiedge (Preston TR, Kossila VL, Goodwin J, Reed S, eds.). FAO Animal Production and Health No 50, pag. 163-184. ISBN 978-92- 5-107452-7.

  13. PEARSON AM, Dutson TR. 2008. Edible Meat By-products Advances in meat research. Elsevier Applied Science. Vol. 8. ISSN 2076-3417.

  14. RIQUELME VE. 1994. Suplementación estratégica con subproductos alimenticios. Acribia, España. ISBN: 978-84-200-0897-4.

  15. STEWART CS, Bryant MP. 2008. The rumen bacteria. In: The rumen Microbial Ecosystem. Edited by P.N. Hobson. Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd. London, England. P 21-76.

  16. VAN SOEST PJ. 1994. Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminants. Second Ed. Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, NY, 476 pag. ISBN 080142772X.

  17. WILLIAMS SE, Tatum JD, Stanton TL. 2007. The effects of muscle thickness and time on feed on hot fat trim yields, carcass characteristics and boneless subprimal yields. Journal of Animal Science; 67 (10): 2669􀇦2676. ISSN 0021-8812.

  18. WISMAN EL, Holmes CE, Engel RW. 2006. Utilization of poultry by-products in poultry rations. Poultry Science. 37: 834-838. ISSN 0032-5791. DOI: 10.3382/ps.0370834.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com