Nápoles-Rodríguez F, Cevallos-González A, Sánchez-Talamantes E, González-Rico JL, Romero-Velarde E, Vásquez-Garibay EM

Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 177-188
PDF size: 134.42 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction. Objective: to test the correlation of the family dynamic score between fathers and mothers of preschool children attending the Integral Development of the Family System (DIF) of Guadalajara City.
Material and methods. In a cross sectional study design 140 family dynamic surveys were included. Eight areas of the dynamic of the family of both parents were explored: I.Dynamic of the couple; II.Formation of identity; III.Communication,expression and solidarity; IV.Structure of the authority; V.Management of the conflict and aggressiveness; VI.Discipline and method; VII.System of values; VIII.Socio cultural integration and isolation.
Results.There were not differences between fathers and mothers in the eight explored areas. The score of fathers and mothers had a significant correlation (r =0.759). Area I had the higher correlation with therest of the areas (P ‹0.005).The correlation among different areas of father and mother were also significant.It was no correlation of area III of fathers vsarea II and VIII of mothers;area IV of fathers vsarea I,II,VII and VIII of mothers.
Conclusion. The strong correlation of the family dynamic score of each couple and among the majorityof reciprocal areas gives a high consistency to the instrument of evaluation.

REFERENCES

1. Jackson D. The study of the family. Fam Proc. 1965; 4: 9.

2. Satir V. Psicoterapia familiar conjunta. México, D. F.: Editorial Prensa Médica Mexicana; 1986. p. 86-8.

3. Dabernat H, Plisson-Saunew MA, Delmas C. Haemophilus influenzae carriage in children attending French day care centers: a molecular epidemiology study. J Clin Microbiol. 2003; 41: 1664-72.

4. Koch A, Molbak K, Homoe P. Risk factors for acute respiratory tract infections in young Greenlandic children. Am J Epidemiol. 2003; 15: 374-84.

5. Koefoed BG, Nielsen AM, Keiding LM. The impact of selected environmental factors on the morbidity of children in day care centers. Ugeskr Laeger (Abs). 2002; 164: 5759-64.

6. Smilkstein G. The family APGAR. A proposal for a family function test and its used by physicians. J Fam Pract. 1978; 6: 12-31.

7. Arias CL, Herrera JA. El APGAR familiar en el cuidado primario de la salud. Colombia Médica. 1994; 25: 26-8.

8. Rodríguez-Fernández E, Gea SA, Gómez MA, García GJM. Apgar questionnaire in the study of family function. Aten Primaria. 1996; 17: 338-41.

9. Gardner W, Nutting PA, Kelleher KJ. Does the family Apgar effectively measure family functioning? J Fam Pract. 2001; 50: 19-25.

10. Salinas JL, Pérez-Viniegra L. Modelo psico-dinámico sistémico de evaluación familiar. Rev Invest Clin. 1992; 44: 169-86.

11. Sánchez TE, Pérez CL, Navarro LME, Kumazawa IM, Vásquez-Garibay E. Dinámica familiar: metodología para su evaluación. Am J Dis 1994; 7: 48-52.

12. Vásquez-Garibay E, Sánchez TE, Navarro LME, Romero VE, Pérez CL, Kumazawa IMR. Instrumento de medición de la dinámica de la familia nuclear mexicana: un enfoque cuantitativo. Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex 2003; 60: 33-52.