medigraphic.com
Órgano Ofical de la Facultad de Estomatología de la Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla

2017, Number 57

<< Back

Oral 2017; 18 (57)

Algorithms for the comprehensive realization of indirect pulp therapy in primary molars

Rubio-Arguello JL, Ureña-Cirett JL

Language: Spanish
References: 23
Page: 1501-1505
PDF size: 140.21 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Indirect pulp treatment (IPT) and pulpotomy (POT) are actually the most accepted procedures to perform vital pulp therapy (VPT) in primary molars. Recently TPI has gained great acceptance because it avoids the amputation of the pulp chamber keeping an intact pulp with all its reparative potential. The main problem with TPI is diagnosis of the pulp status. In the present article, algorithms based in different variables like affected tooth and localization, deep and activity of the caries lesion are proposed in order to guide the clinician step by step in the performance of a correct TPV.


REFERENCES

  1. Ranly D. Pulpotomy therapy in primary teeth: new modalities for old rationales. Pediatr Dent 1994; 16: 403-09.

  2. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Guideline on pulp therapy for primary and immature permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent 2013; 34(suppl): 222-29.

  3. Lin L, Langeland K. Light and electron microscopic study of teeth with carious pulp exposures.Oral Surg 1981; 51: 292-316.

  4. Ricketts D, Kidd E, Innes N, Clarkson J. Complete or ultraconservative removal of decayed tissue in unfilled teeth. Cochrane database syst.rev. 2006 Jul 19:(3): CD003808.

  5. Coll J. Indirect pulp capping and primary teeth: Is the primary tooth pulpotomy out of date? Pediatr Dent 2008; 30: 230-36.

  6. Farooq N, Coll J, Kuwabara A, Shelton P. Success rate of formocresol pulpotomy and indirect pulp therapy in the treatment of deep dentinal caries in primary teeth.Pediatr Dent 2000; 22: 278-86.

  7. Al Zayer M, Straffon L, Feigal R, Welch K. Indirect pulp treatment of primary posterior teeth:a retrospective study. Pediatr Dent 2003; 25: 29-36.

  8. Chambers IG. The role and methods of pulp testing in oral diagnosis: a review. Int Endod J 1982; 15: 1-15.

  9. Gazelius B, Olgart L, Edwall B, Edwall L. Non-invasive re-cording of blood flow in human dental pulp. Endod Dent Traumatol 1986; 2: 219-21.

  10. Heidari A, Sharabi M, Teheran University. Oral Session 016-110 IAPD meeting, Seoul; June 2013.

  11. Coll J, Campbell A, Chalmers N. Effects of glass ionomer temporary restorations on pulpal diagnosis and treatment outcomes in primary molars. Pediatr Dent 2013; 35: 416-21.

  12. Holland L, Walls A, Wallwork M, Murray J. The longevity of amalgam restorations in deciduous molars. Br Dent J 1986; 161: 255-58.

  13. Kassa D, Day P, Duggal M. Histological comparison of pulpal inflammation in primary teeth with occlusal or proximal caries. Int J Paediatr Dent 2008; 19: 26-33.

  14. Reeves R, Stanley H. The relationship of bacterial penetration and pulpal pathosis in carious teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1966; 22: 59.

  15. Rayner J, Southam J. Pulp changes in deciduous teeth associated with deep carious dentine. J Dent Child 1979; 7: 39-42.

  16. Lula E, Monteiro-Neto V, Alves C, Ribeiro C. Microbiological analysis after complete or partial removal of carious dentin in primary teeth: A randomized clinical trial. Caries Res 2009; 43: 354-58.

  17. Massara M, Alves J, Brandao P. Atraumatic Restorative Treatment: Clinical, ultarestructural and chemical analysis. Caries Res 2002; 36:430-36.

  18. Law D, Lewis T. The effects of calcium hydroxide on deep carious lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1961;14: 1130-37.

  19. EL, Irie M, Nagaoka N, Yamashiro T, Suzuki K. Mechanical properties of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for luting: effect of adding spherical silica filler. Det Mater J 2010; 29: 253-61.

  20. Colon P, Bronnec F, Grosgogeat B, Pradelle-Plasse N. Interactions between a calcium silicate cement (Biodentine) and its environment. J Dent Res 2010; 89-Abstract No.401.

  21. Guelmann M, Bookmyer K, Villalta P, Garcia-Godoy F. Microleakage of restorative techniques for pulpotomized primary molars. J Dent Child 2004; 71: 209-11.

  22. Holan G, Fuks A, Ketlz N. Success rate of formocresol pulpotomy in primary molars restored with stainless steel crown vs amalgam. Pediatr Dent 2002; 24: 212-16.

  23. Hutcheson C, Seale S, McWhorter A, Kerins C, Wright J. Multisurface composite vs Stainless steel crown restorations after Mineral Trioxide Aggregate pulpotomy: A randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Dent 2012; 34: 460-67.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com