medigraphic.com
Órgano Ofical de la Facultad de Estomatología de la Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla

2017, Número 57

<< Anterior

Oral 2017; 18 (57)


Algoritmos para la realización comprehensiva de la terapia pulpar indirecta en molares primarios

Rubio-Arguello JL, Ureña-Cirett JL

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 23
Paginas: 1501-1505
Archivo PDF: 140.21 Kb.


RESUMEN

La terapia pulpar indirecta (TPI) y la pulpotomía (POT) constituyen en la actualidad los procedimientos más aceptados para realizar terapia pulpar vital (TPV) en molares primarios. La TPI ha ganado más aceptación recientemente ya que permite preservar la pulpa intacta con toda su capacidad reparativa sin necesidad de amputarla. El problema principal al que nos enfrentamos al realizar TPI es el diagnóstico del estado pulpar. En el presente trabajo se desarrollan algoritmos que puedan guiar paso a paso al clínico para realizar una correcta TPV tomando en cuenta factores como el diente afectado, localización, profundidad y actividad de la lesión cariosa.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Ranly D. Pulpotomy therapy in primary teeth: new modalities for old rationales. Pediatr Dent 1994; 16: 403-09.

  2. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Guideline on pulp therapy for primary and immature permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent 2013; 34(suppl): 222-29.

  3. Lin L, Langeland K. Light and electron microscopic study of teeth with carious pulp exposures.Oral Surg 1981; 51: 292-316.

  4. Ricketts D, Kidd E, Innes N, Clarkson J. Complete or ultraconservative removal of decayed tissue in unfilled teeth. Cochrane database syst.rev. 2006 Jul 19:(3): CD003808.

  5. Coll J. Indirect pulp capping and primary teeth: Is the primary tooth pulpotomy out of date? Pediatr Dent 2008; 30: 230-36.

  6. Farooq N, Coll J, Kuwabara A, Shelton P. Success rate of formocresol pulpotomy and indirect pulp therapy in the treatment of deep dentinal caries in primary teeth.Pediatr Dent 2000; 22: 278-86.

  7. Al Zayer M, Straffon L, Feigal R, Welch K. Indirect pulp treatment of primary posterior teeth:a retrospective study. Pediatr Dent 2003; 25: 29-36.

  8. Chambers IG. The role and methods of pulp testing in oral diagnosis: a review. Int Endod J 1982; 15: 1-15.

  9. Gazelius B, Olgart L, Edwall B, Edwall L. Non-invasive re-cording of blood flow in human dental pulp. Endod Dent Traumatol 1986; 2: 219-21.

  10. Heidari A, Sharabi M, Teheran University. Oral Session 016-110 IAPD meeting, Seoul; June 2013.

  11. Coll J, Campbell A, Chalmers N. Effects of glass ionomer temporary restorations on pulpal diagnosis and treatment outcomes in primary molars. Pediatr Dent 2013; 35: 416-21.

  12. Holland L, Walls A, Wallwork M, Murray J. The longevity of amalgam restorations in deciduous molars. Br Dent J 1986; 161: 255-58.

  13. Kassa D, Day P, Duggal M. Histological comparison of pulpal inflammation in primary teeth with occlusal or proximal caries. Int J Paediatr Dent 2008; 19: 26-33.

  14. Reeves R, Stanley H. The relationship of bacterial penetration and pulpal pathosis in carious teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1966; 22: 59.

  15. Rayner J, Southam J. Pulp changes in deciduous teeth associated with deep carious dentine. J Dent Child 1979; 7: 39-42.

  16. Lula E, Monteiro-Neto V, Alves C, Ribeiro C. Microbiological analysis after complete or partial removal of carious dentin in primary teeth: A randomized clinical trial. Caries Res 2009; 43: 354-58.

  17. Massara M, Alves J, Brandao P. Atraumatic Restorative Treatment: Clinical, ultarestructural and chemical analysis. Caries Res 2002; 36:430-36.

  18. Law D, Lewis T. The effects of calcium hydroxide on deep carious lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1961;14: 1130-37.

  19. EL, Irie M, Nagaoka N, Yamashiro T, Suzuki K. Mechanical properties of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for luting: effect of adding spherical silica filler. Det Mater J 2010; 29: 253-61.

  20. Colon P, Bronnec F, Grosgogeat B, Pradelle-Plasse N. Interactions between a calcium silicate cement (Biodentine) and its environment. J Dent Res 2010; 89-Abstract No.401.

  21. Guelmann M, Bookmyer K, Villalta P, Garcia-Godoy F. Microleakage of restorative techniques for pulpotomized primary molars. J Dent Child 2004; 71: 209-11.

  22. Holan G, Fuks A, Ketlz N. Success rate of formocresol pulpotomy in primary molars restored with stainless steel crown vs amalgam. Pediatr Dent 2002; 24: 212-16.

  23. Hutcheson C, Seale S, McWhorter A, Kerins C, Wright J. Multisurface composite vs Stainless steel crown restorations after Mineral Trioxide Aggregate pulpotomy: A randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Dent 2012; 34: 460-67.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com