medigraphic.com
ISSN 1029-3043 (Electronic)

2017, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Medicentro 2017; 21 (4)

Suboptimal fetal growth screening

Sarasa MNL, Cañizares LO, Limas PY

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 339-342
PDF size: 289.58 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The early diagnosis of intrauterine growth restrictions constitutes a useful tool to plan effective preventive actions, as well as, to implement systematic actions in primary health care. There are different criteria and indicators for this purpose and the anthropometric criterion of the Latin American Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology distinguishes among them; it assumes 2.5 percentile of fetal abdominal circumference as a cut -off point, below which it is considered suggestive of restriction, although this is applied in the third trimester of pregnancy, when the time to take actions is few. This study is intended to show the construction and validation of a new indicator called fetal weight gain, confirming the identified diagnoses in the third trimester, but allowing greater opportunities of medical intervention when is applied in the second trimester of pregnancy.


REFERENCES

  1. Savchev S, Figueras F, Sanz Cortes M, Cruz Lemini M, Triunfo S, Botet F, et al. Evaluation of an optimal gestational age cut-off for the definition of early- and late-onset fetal growth restriction. Fetal Diagn Ther [internet]. 2014 Aug. [citado 25 abr. 2016];36(2):[aprox. 7 p.]. Disponible en: https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/355525

  2. Valsa Chathampadathil A. Fetal growth restriction: aetiology, screening, diagnosis and management. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol [internet]. 2015 Nov.-Dec. [citado 14 mar. 2016];4(6):[aprox. 6 p.]. Disponible en: http://www.ijrcog.org/index.php/ijrcog/article/view/2280/1970

  3. Suhag A, Berghella V. Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR): etiology and diagnosis. Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep [internet]. 2013 Jun. [citado 25 mayo 2015];2(2):[aprox. 10 p.]. Disponible en: https://link.springer.com/article/%2010.1007/s13669-013-0041-z

  4. Lausman A, Kingdom J. Intrauterine Growth Restriction: Screening, Diagnosis, and Management. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013;35(8):741-8.

  5. Chauhan SP, Beydoun H, Chang E, Sandlin AT, Dahlke JD, Igwe E, et al. Prenatal detection of fetal growth restriction in newborns classified as small for gestational age: correlates and risk of neonatal morbidity. Am J Perinatol. 2014;31:187-94.

  6. Donoso Bernales B, Oyarzún Ebensperger E. Restricción del crecimiento intrauterino. Medwave [internet]. 2012 jul. [citado 11 abr. 2016];12(6):[aprox. 8 p.]. Disponible en: https://www.medwave.cl/link.cgi/Medwave/PuestaDia/Practica/5433

  7. Pérez Wulff JA, Márquez Contreras D, Muñoz H, Solís Delgado A, Otaño L, Ayala Hung VJ. Restricción de crecimiento intrauterino. Guía Clínica de FLASOG. GC No. 2 [internet]. Caracas: Federación Latino Americana de Sociedades de Obstetricia y Ginecología; 2013 [citado 11 abr. 2015]. Disponible en: http://redlagrey.com/files/Guia-Clinica-de-Restricion-del-Crecimiento-Intrauterino-2013.pdf

  8. Sovio U, White IR, Dacey A, Pasupathy D, Smith G. CS. Screening for fetal growth restriction with universal third trimester ultrasonography in nulliparous women in the Pregnancy Outcome Prediction (POP) study: a prospective cohort study. The Lancet. 2015;386(10008):2089-97.

  9. Albu AR, Horhoianu IA, Dumitrascu MC, Horhoianu V, Davila C. Growth assessment in diagnosis of Fetal Growth Restriction. Review. J Med Life [internet]. 2014 Jun. 15 [citado 25 abr. 2016];7(2):[aprox. 5 p.]. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4197499/

  10. Barker ED, McAuliffe FM, Alderdice F, Unterscheider J, Daly S, Geary MP, et al. The role of growth trajectories in classifying fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol [internet]. 2013 Aug. [citado 23 mayo 2015];122(2 Pt 1):[aprox. 7 p.]. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23969791




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com