Gómez BR, Rodríguez MA, Armenteros GA, Pérez PPN

Language: Spanish
References: 19
Page: 45-54
PDF size: 531.93 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The intestinal invagination is the most frequent cause in intestinal occlusion in children during the first year of life and it corresponds to the intussusception of an intestine segment inside another adjacent segment.
Objective: To characterize the pediatric patients with intestinal invagination tried by hydrostatic reduction guided by ultrasonography in the Hospital Pediátrico Docente Provincial "José Luis Miranda" of Santa Clara in the period of January of 2009 until February of 2015.
Material and Methods: An observational, descriptive and cross-sectional study was performed in 68 patients bigger than three months and smaller than two years in those the diagnosis of intestinal invagination by sonography was confirmed and the method of hydrostatic reduction was applied with solution low saline under sonographic control.
Results: The males of the age group prevailed smaller than six months, eutrophics, of color of white skin (55,9%). The main risk factor was the introduction of new foods (29,4%). The symptom and cardinal sign were the irritability and the blood to the rectal tact (91,2% and 79,4% respectively). They didn't show up complications characteristic of proceeding and the method of hydrostatic reduction was effective in 95,6% of the cases.
Conclusions: The intestinal invagination showed up most often in the first months of life talking to the method of hydrostatic reduction, which had very effective results without associate complications and with a good presage in these patients.

REFERENCES

1. Pardo G, García A. Temas de Cirugía. Tomo 2. La Habana: Editorial Ciencias Médicas; 2010.

2. Soler R. Cirugía del Abdomen. La Habana: Editorial Ciencias Médicas; 2010.

3. Saverino BP, Lava C, Lowe LH, Rivard DC. Radiographic findings in the diagnosis of pediatric ileocolic intussusception: comparison to a control population. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2010; 26(4):281-4.

4. Latipov R, Khudoyorov R, Flem E. Childhood intussusception in Uzbekistan: analysis of retrospective surveillance data. BMC Pediatr [Internet]. 2011 [citado 10 ener 2015]; 11: [aprox. 8 p.]. Disponible en: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2431/11/22

5. Jenke AC, Klaassen-Mielke R, Zilbauer M, Heininger U, Trampisch H, Wirth S. Intussusception: incidence and treatment-insights from the nationwide German surveillance. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr [Internet]. 2011 [citado 15 ener 2015]; 52(4): [aprox. 5 p.]. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21415671

6. Bissantz N, Jenke AC, Trampisch M, Klaassen-Mielke R, Bissantz K, Trampisch HJ, et al. Hospital-based, prospective, multicentre surveillance to determine the incidence of intussusception in children aged below 15 years in Germany. BMC Gastroenterol [Internet]. 2011 [citado 20 ener 2015]; 11: [aprox. 8 p.]. Disponible en: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-230X/11/26

7. Kohl LJ, Streng A, Grote V, Koletzko S, Liese JG. Intussusception-associated hospitalisations in southern Germany. Eur J Pediatr [Internet]. 2010 [citado 5 feb 2015]; 169(12): [aprox. 5p.]. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20640443

8. Bringue X, Ibars Z, Martinez M, Morales I, Sole E. Intestinal invagination: change in its incidence from 1987 to 2008. Cir Pediatr [Internet]. 2010 [citado 5 feb 2015]; 206(4): [aprox. 6p.]. Disponible en: www.secipe.org/coldata/upload/revista/2010_23-4_206-210.pdf

9. Morffi BE. Conducta imagenológica ante la invaginación intestinal en la edad pediátrica. Revisión bibliográfica. Mediciego [Internet]. 2010 [citado 18 ene 2015]; 16(Supl. 1 ): [aprox. 9 p.]; Disponible en: http://bvs.sld.cu/revistas/mciego/vol16_supl1_0/pdf/t.pdf

10. Koplewitz BZ, Simanovsky N, Lebensart PD, Udassin R, Abu-Dalu K, Arbell D. Air encircling the intussusceptum on air enema for intussusception reduction: an indication for surgery? Br J Radiol. 2011; 84: 719-26.

11. Hernández E, Martínez N, Bueno JC, Delgado N, Morán C, Aguilar D. Guías de Buenas Prácticas Clínicas. Invaginación intestinal. Medisur [Internet]. 2005 oct [citado 12 febrero 2015]; 3(5): [aprox. 7p.]. Disponible en: http://medisur.sld.cu/index.php/medisur/article/view/158/3502

12. Escaffi JA, Valenzuela AM. Reduccion hidrostática de invaginación intestinal guiada por ultrasonido:Nueva opción. Rev Chil Radiol [Internet]. 2008 [citado 20 ener 2015]; 14(1): [aprox. 6 p.]. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?pid=S071793082008000100005&script=sci_arttext

13. Chen SC, Wang JD, Hsu HY, Leong MM, Tok TS, Chin YY. Epidemiology of childhood intussusception and determinants of recurrence and operation: analysis of national health insurance data between 1998 and 2007 in Taiwan. Pediatr Neonatol. 2010; 51(5):285-91.

14. Johnson B, Gargiullo P, Murphy TV, Parashar UD, Patel MM. Sociodemographic and dietary risk factors for natural infant intussusception in the United States. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2010;51(4):458-63.

15. Greenberg HB. Rotavirus vaccination and intussusception-act two. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364(24): 2354-65.

16. Patel MM, Lopez-Collada VR, Bulhoes MM, De Oliveira LH, Bautista Marquez A, Flannery B, et al. Intussusception risk and health benefits of rotavirus vaccination in Mexico and Brazil. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364(24): 2283-92.

17. Vandertuin L, Vunda A, Gehri M, Sanchez O, Hanquinet S, Gervaix A. Intestinal intussusception in children: truly a classic triad?. Rev Med Suisse. 2011; 7(283): 451-5.

18. Hernández E, Martínez N, Bueno JC, Delgado N, Aguilar D, Duany AT. Reducción hidrostática de la invaginación intestinal con solución salina y guía de ultrasonido. Valoración de su efectividad y seguridad. Arch Med Camaguey [Internet]. 2005 [citado 12 febr 2015]; 9(6): [aprox. 11 p.]. Disponible en: http://www.amc.sld.cu/amc/2005/v9-n6-2005/2013.pdf

19. Departamento de Contabilidad. Hospital Pediátrico Docente “José Luis Miranda”. Villa Clara. 2015.