2017, Number 3
<< Back Next >>
Rev Neurol Neurocir Psiquiat 2017; 45 (3)
Classification of the stimuli that elicit the sympathetic skin reflex. Non-physiological, physiological and cognitive and emotional stimuli
Estañol B, Delgado-García J, Sentíes-Madrid H, Añorve-Clavel D, Coyac-Cuautle P, Macías-Gallardo J, Guraieb-Chain P
Language: English
References: 20
Page: 82-89
PDF size: 296.05 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The sympathetic skin response is generated by a diversity of non-physiological, physiological, cognitive and emotional stimuli. The stimuli that induce the response seem to be disparate and unrelated. We propose a classification of the stimuli that induce the electrodermal response and suggest a common physiological basis underlying the various stimuli.
Subjects and methods: We studied twenty healthy subjects in whom the sympathetic skin response was induced with: 1) a cough; 2) a sudden blank noise; 3) eye opening; and 4) muscle contraction. The electrodermal response was obtained ten times in each subject with each stimulus. The stimulus was given one minute apart. The respiratory, the acoustic, the eye opening and the muscle contraction stimuli were recorded in the traces of all subjects. We also obtained the response at least three times in each subject during the moment of standing, sighs, sudden inspirations, talking, unexpected tactile stimulation, verbal instructions, mental calculations, and during the cold face test.
Results: The response was readily obtained with cough, noise, eye opening and muscle contraction in all normal subjects. The amplitude of the response varied from trial to trial and from subject to subject. We did not give repetitive stimulation to habituate the response. Somnolence was the most common cause of an absent response. Sighs were the most common cause of a seemingly spontaneous response. Laughter and mental calculation gave a large and long lasting response.
Discussion: The proposed classification of the sympathetic skin response in non-physiological, physiological and cognitive and emotional seem to have some heuristic value. The sympathetic skin response seems to be part of a generalized mechanism of arousal and attention in which there is sympathetic activation of the eccrine skin glands of the skin. The sympathetic skin response is a complex response that acquires a physiological meaning when seen as a part of a generalized sympathetic activation. The sympathetic skin response should always be recorded with respiratory movements. Noise, eye opening, muscle contractions, verbal instructions and somnolence are confounding factors that should be monitored.
REFERENCES
Schondorf R. Skin potentials: normal and abnormal. Available in: Low PA. Clinical autonomic disorders: evaluation and management. New York: Lippincott Raven; 1997: 231-232.
Low PA, Fealey RD. Evaluation of sudomotor function. Available in: Mathias CJ, Bannister R. Autonomic Failure. UK: Oxford University Press; 1999: 263-270.
Claus D, Schondorf R. Sympathetic skin response. Recommendations for the practice of clinical neurophysiology: Guidelines of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol. 1999; 52: 277-282.
Shahani BT, Hallperin JJ, Boulu P, Cohen J. Sympathetic skin response-a method of assessing unmyelinated axon dysfunction in peripheral neuropathies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1984; 47: 536-542.
Soliven B, Maselli R, Jaspan J et al. Sympathetic skin response in diabetic neuropathy. Muscle Nerve. 1987; 10: 711-716.
Valls Sole J, Monforte R, Estruch R. Abnormal sympathetic skin response in alcoholic subjects. J Neurol Sci. 1991; 102: 233-237.
Yokota T, Matsunaga T, Okiyama R, et al. Sympathetic skin response in patients with multiple sclerosis compared with patients with spinal cord transection and normal controls. Brain. 1991; 114: 1381-1394.
Drory VE, Korczyn AD. The sympathetic skin response in sympathetic dystrophy. J Neurol Sc. 1995; 128: 92-95.
Uncini A, Pullman SL, Lovelace RE, Gambi D. The sympathetic skin response: normal values, elucidation of afferent components and application limits. J Neurol Sci. 1988; 87: 299-306.
Macleod AF, Smith SA, Cowel T, Richardson PR, Sonksen PH. Non-cardiac autonomic tests in diabetes: use of the galvanic skin response. Diabet Med. 1991; 8: S67-S70.
Lloyd D. Action potential and secretory potential of sweat gland. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 1961; 47: 351-362.
Hoeldkte RE, Davis KM, Hshieh PB, Gaspar SR, Dworkin GE. Autonomic surface potential analysis: assessment of reproducibility and sensitivity. Muscle Nerve. 1992; 15: 926-931.
Elie B, Guiheneuc P. Sympathetic skin response: normal results in different experimental conditions. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1990; 76: 258-267.
Kira Y, Ogura T, Aramaki S, Kubo T, Hayasida T, Hirasawa Y. Sympathetic skin response evoked by respiratory stimulation as a measure of sympathetic function. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001; 112: 861-865.
Kobayashi M, Tomioka N, Ushiyana Y, Ohhashi T. Arithmetic calculation, deep inspiration or handgrip exercise mediate preoperational active palmar sweating responses in humans. Auton Neurosc. 2003; 28: 58-65.
Critchley HD, Elliot R, Mathias CJ, Dolan RJ. Neural activity relating to generation and representation of galvanic skin conductance responses: a functional magnetic imaging study. J Neurosci. 2000; 20: 3033-3040.
Edelberg R. Electrical properties of the skin. Available in: Brown CC. Methods in Psycophysiology. Baltimore: William and Wilkins; 1967: 1-52.
Shaver BA, Brusilow S, Cooke RE. Origin of the galvanic skin response. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1962; 110: 559-564.
Allen J, Frame JR, Murray A. Microvascular blood flow and skin temperature changes in the fingers following a deep inspiratory gasp. Physiol Meas. 2002; 23: 365-373.
Niakan E, Harati Y. Sympathetic skin response in diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Muscle Nerve. 1988; 11: 261-264.