medigraphic.com
ISSN 8541-3697 (Print)

2018, Number 1

<< Back

AbanicoVet 2018; 8 (1)

Sensorial assessment of “chorizo” as a type of sausage based on rabbit meat

Cruz-Bacab L, Baeza-Mendoza L, Pérez-Robles L, Martínez-Molina I

Language: Spanish
References: 25
Page: 102-111
PDF size: 810.71 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Rabbit meat is a viable option to meet the qualitative and nutritional demands of the current consumers, due to its easy digestion, high protein content and unsaturated fatty acids, low-fat concentration. Despite its nutritional characteristics, this meat is not widely accepted in Mexico, so it is necessary to develop products that favor its acceptance. In the present study, two experiments were carried out using sensory tests to evaluate the acceptance of a sausage type made from rabbit meat. Experiment one consisted of a sensorial test of the sausage with 24 hours of rest after its elaboration, through a hedonic scale with values from 1 to 10 where 1 corresponded to the lowest score and 10 to the highest. Experiment two was developed by a sensorial test for a sausage ripened at 48, 120, 216 and 312 hours, with the hedonic scale established for experiment one. The evaluated aspects of the product were: color, smell, flavor, texture and overall, the results were analyzed by means of descriptive statistics and analysis of variance. In conclusion, the sausage was accepted by the participants in both experiments. In experiment two, the highest level of acceptance corresponded to 216 hours of maturation (P ‹0.05).


REFERENCES

  1. 1 ACEVEDO D, Granados C, Montero PM. 2014. Caracterización de propiedades fisicoquímicas, textura y calidad microbiológica de butifarra comercializada en Cartagena (Colombia). Información Tecnológica. Vol. 25 (6): 33-38 ISSN: 0718-0764. DOI: 10.4067/S0718-07642014000600005.

  2. ARAYA-QUESADA Y, Jiménez-Robles A, Ivankovich-Guillen C, García-Barquero M. 2014. Hábitos de consumo de embutidos en el cantón de San Carlos y el área metropolitana de Costa Rica. Tecnología en marcha. 27 (4): 113 -124. ISSN: 0379-3962 DOI: 10.18845/tm.v27i4.2091.

  3. CASTILLO ARTEAGA MG, Cruz García IA, García Ramírez DA, González Sánchez MS, Tapia Cardona IY, Vargas Sierra M. 2013. Carne de conejo, alternativa a favor de la salud. Vida Científica. Boletín científico de la escuela preparatoria N°4. Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo Vol. 1 (2). ISSN: 2007-4905.

  4. COBOS VJE, Soto SS, Alfaro RRH, Aguirre Álvarez G, Rodríguez PBR, González TR. 2014. Evaluación de parámetros de calidad de chorizos elaborados con carne de conejo, cordero y cerdo, adicionados con fibra de trigo. Nacameh. 8(1):50 – 64. ISSN:2007-0373. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/6031413.pdf

  5. CUBERO-ROJAS RG, Mora-Peraza E, Wingching-Jones R, Calderon-Villaplana S. 2013. Maduración de solomo (Bicep femoris) en vacas de descarte Bos indicus y Bos Taurus. Agronomía mesoamericana. 24(2):433-440. ISSN: 1021-7444 DOI: 10.15517/am.v24i2.12546.

  6. DALLE-ZOTTE A. 2002. Perception of rabbit meat quality and major factors influencing the rabbit carcass and meat quality. Livestock Production Science. 75:11-32. ISSN: 1871- 1413 DOI: 10.1016/S0301-6226(01)00308-6.

  7. DALLE-ZOTTE A, Szendro S. 2011. The role of rabbit meat as functional food. Review. Meat Science. 88 319 – 331. ISSN: 0309-1740. DOI:10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.02.017.

  8. DALLE-ZOTTE A. 2014. Rabbit farming for meat purposes. Animal Frontier. 4(4):62-67. DOI 10.2527/af.2014-0035 ISSN 2160-6056.

  9. GÓMEZ R, Picazo MI, Alvarruiz A, Pérez JI, Valera D, Pardo JE. 2001. Influencia del tipo de pimentón en la pérdida de color del chorizo fresco. Alimentaria, revista de tecnología e higiene de los alimentos. 28 (323): 67-73 ISSN 0300-5755. http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=1001087

  10. GONZÁLEZ – TENORIO R, Totosaus A, Caro I, Mateo J. 2013. Caracterización de las propiedades químicas y fisicoquímicas de chorizos comercializados en la zona centro de México. Información Tecnológica. Vol. 24 (2): 3 – 14 ISSN: 0718-0764 DOI: 10.4067/S0718-07642013000200002.

  11. GUERRERO I, Pérez ML, Ponce E. 2002. Curso práctico de tecnología de carnes y pescado. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana. Unidad Iztapalapa. México. ISBN 9706549846.

  12. JIMÉNEZ-COLMENERO F, Triki M, Herrero AM, Rodríguez-Salas L, Ruiz-Capillas C. 2013. Healthy oil combination stabilized in a konjac matrix as pork fat replacement in lowfat, PUFA-enriched, dry fermented sausages. LWT-Food Science and Technology. 51:158-163. ISSN: 0023-6438 DOI:10.1016/j.lwt.2012.10.016.

  13. KOOHMARAIE M, Kent M, Shackelford SD, Veiseth E, Wheeler TL. 2002. Meat tenderness and muscle growth: Is there any relationship?. Meat Science. 62 (Special Issue S1) 345 – 352. ISSN: 0023-6438 DOI: 10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00127-4.

  14. LENGKEY HAW, Lobo BR. 2016. Physico-chemical and microbiological characteristics, sensory quality and acceptability of native chicken and rabbit sausage produced with corn oil, margarine and beef fat. Macedonian Veterinary Review. 39 (2): 193 – 199. ISSN: 1857- 7425 DOI:10.1515/macvetrev-2016-0087.

  15. MCNITT JI, Patton NM, Lukefahr SD, Cheeke PR. 2011. Rabbit production. 8th ed. CABI. Wallingford, UK. 314 p. ISBN:1780640110.

  16. MONTES ÁLVAREZ J, Restrepo Floréz C, Patiño Gómez J, Cano Salazar JA. 2013. Efecto de la concentración de cultivos iniciadores y dextrosa sobre la calidad de la maduración y vida útil sensorial del peperoni. Revista Lasallista de Investigación. Vol. 10 n°1. ISSN 1794-4449. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1794- 44492013000100010

  17. NISTOR E, Bampidis VA, Pacala N, Pentea M, Tozer J, Prundeanu H. 2013. Nutrient content of rabbit meat as compared to chicken, beef and pork meat. Journal of animal production advances. 3(4):172-176. ISSN:2251-7677 DOI:10.5455/japa.20130411110313.

  18. PETRACCI M, Cavani C. 2013. Rabbit meat processing: Historical perspective to future directions. World Rabbit Science. 21:217-226. ISSN:1257-5011 DOI:10.4995/wrs.2013.1329.

  19. PÉREZ DD, Andújar RG. 2000. Cambios de coloración de los productos cárnicos. Revista Cubana de Alimentación y Nutrición. 14 (2):114 – 123. ISSN: 0864-2133. http://www.bvs.sld.cu/revistas/ali/vol14_2_00/ali07200.htm?iframe=true&width=90%&he ight=90%

  20. QUINTERO-SALAZAR B, Santillan Alvárez A, Dublán García O, Viesca González FC, Castillón – Jardón J. 2011. Tipificación parcial de embutidos artesanales de la Ciudad de Toluca: Chorizo verde. Nacameh. 5 (1): 10-26 (2011).ISSN: 2007-0373. http://www.academia.edu/download/41352121/Nacameh_v5n1_010QuinteroSalazaretal. pdf

  21. REVILLA I, Vivar AM. 2005. The effect of different paprika types on the ripening process and quality of dry sausages. International Journal of Food Science and Technology. 40 (4): 411-417. ISSN: 1365-2621 DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2005.00944.x.

  22. TRIKI M, Herrero AM, Jiménez-Colmenero F, Ruiz Capillas C. 2013. Effect of preformed konjac gels, with and without olive oil, on the technological attributes and storage stability of merguez sausage. Meat Science. 93:351-360. ISSN:0023-6438 DOI:10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.10.004.

  23. WAMBUI JM, Karuri EG, Wanyoike MMM. 2016. Interaction among nutritive, textural and sensory properties of rabbit sausages. Journal of Food Processing. Vol. 2016. Article ID 4059023. 6 pages. ISSN: 2356-7384 DOI:10.1155/2016/4059023 https://www.hindawi.com/archive/2016/4059023/cta/

  24. WANG J, Elzo MA, Linjun Y, Chen S, Jia X, Zhang M, Lai S. 2016. A single nucleotide polymorphism in CAST gene is associated with meat quality traits in rabbits. Animal Science Papers and Reports. 24(3):269 – 278. ISSN:0860-4037 DOI:10.1080/1828051X.2017.1296333.

  25. WEISS J, Gibis M, Schuh V, Salminen H. 2010. Advances in ingredient and processing systems for meat and meat products. Meat Science. 86:196–213. ISSN:0023-6438 DOI:10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.05.008




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com