medigraphic.com
ISSN 0016-3813 (Print)

2017, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Gac Med Mex 2017; 153 (4)

Índice glucémico y carga glucémica en el fruto de la especie vegetal Opuntia ficus-indica

Ibarra SMJ, Novelo HHI, De León SMA, Sánchez MME, Mata OMC, Garza JAJ

Language: Spanish
References: 32
Page: 475-481
PDF size: 248.33 Kb.


ABSTRACT

There is evidence that support the clinical usage of glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) in the prevention of chronic disease. Objective: To determine the GI and GL of the Opuntia ficus-indica fruit. Methodology: An analytic, transversal study was made involving 25 healthy volunteers accepted by an informed consent with a normal body mass index, glucose, glycoside hemoglobin, cholesterol and serum triglycerides. The homogeneity of the population was evaluated with anthropometrical and biochemical data using principal component analysis (PCA). The equivalent of 50 g of carbohydrates test food (tuna) and 50 g of dextrose as food standard was provided for the measure of the glucose curve. The GI was determined by calculating the area under the curve by the triangulation method. The CG was reported as the product of IG by carbohydrate loading provided. Results and Conclusions: The IG of the tuna was 48.01 ± 17.4, classified as low, while the CG was 24.0 ± 8.7 rated as high. The chemometric analysis by PCA showed that the selection of the normal population for determining the IG, it is important to consider the values of cholesterol and triglycerides.


REFERENCES

  1. Casanueva E, Kaufer M, Pérez A, et al. Nutriología médica. México, DF: Editorial Médica Panamericana y Fundación Mexicana para la Salud; 2008.

  2. Jenkins D, Kendall C, Agustín L, et al. Glycemic index: overview of implications in health and disease. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002;76(Suppl): 266S-73S.

  3. Mahan K, Escott-Stump S. Dietoterapia de Krause. 12ª ed. Barcelona: Elsevier Masson; 2009.

  4. Wolever T. The glycemic index. A physiological classification of dietary carbohydrate. Oxford: CABI Publishing; 2006.

  5. Wolever T, Jenkins D, Jenkins A, et al. The glycemic index: methodology and clinical implications. J Clin Nutr. 1991;54:846-54.

  6. Román L, Guerrero B, García P. Dietoterapia, nutrición clínica y metabolismo. Madrid: Díaz de Santos; 2010.

  7. Radulian G, Rusu E, Dragomir A, et al. Metabolic effects of low glycemic index diets. Nutr J. 2009;8:5.

  8. Afaghi A, Ziace A, Kiace SM, et al. Glycemic index and glycemic loads of variety of fruits: clinical implementation of fruits serving size in low glycemic load diet. Current Topics in Nutriaceutical Research. 2009;7:157-60.

  9. Foster-Powell K, Holt SH, Brand-Miller JC. International table of glycemic index and glycemic load values. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002;76:5-56.

  10. Lamport DJ, Hoyle E, Lawton C, et al. Evidence for a second meal cognitive effects in glycemic index evening meals are associate with cognition the collowing morning. Nutr Neurosci. 2011;14:66-71.

  11. Castillo GE, Martínez SI. Manual de fitoterapia. Barcelona: Elsevier Masson; 2007.

  12. González FMM. Plantas medicinales del noreste de México. Revista IMSS; 1988.

  13. Touil A, Chemkhi S, Zagrouba F. Physico-chemical characterization of Opuntia dillenii fruit. International Journal of Food Engineering. 2010;6:1-16.

  14. Kuti JO. Antioxidant compounds from four Opuntia cactus pear fruit varieties. Food Chemistry. 2004;85:527-33.

  15. Vanaclocha B, Cañigueral S. Fitoterapia: vademecum de prescripción. Barcelona: Elsevier Masson; 2003.

  16. Sáenz C, Berger H, Corrales GJ, et al. Utilización agroindustrial del nopal. Boletín de Servicios Agrícolas de la FAO. 2006;162:1-97.

  17. Abdallah IZ. Evaluation of hypoglycemic activity of Opuntia dillenii haw fruit juice in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine. 2008;33:554-8.

  18. Hassan F, El-Razek A, Hassan A. Nutritional value and hypoglycemic effect of prickly cactus pear (Opuntia ficus-indica) fruit juice in alloxan-induced diabetic rats. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. 2011;10:356-77.

  19. Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública. Encuesta Nacional de Salud Pública y Nutrición 2012. Estado de nutrición, anemia, seguridad alimentaria en la población mexicana.

  20. Federación Mexicana de Diabetes. Diabetes en números. 2014. Disponible en: http://fmdiabetes.org/category/diabetes-en-numeros.

  21. Bacardi Gascon M, Dueñas Mena D, Jiménez Cruz A. Lowering effect on posprandial glycemic response of nopales added to Mexican breakfasts. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:1264-5.

  22. Frati Munari A, Roca Vides R, López Pérez R, et al. Índice glucémico de algunos alimentos comunes en México. Gac Med Mex. 1991;127:163-72.

  23. World Health Organization. BMI classification. 2004. Disponible en: http:// apps.who.int/bmi/index.jsp?introPage=intro_3.html

  24. Morrison Treseler K. Laboratorio clínico y pruebas de diagnóstico. 3ª ed. México: Manual moderno; 1999.

  25. CAMO software 2005. The Unscrambler Methods. Disponible en: http:// www.camo.com/downloads/U9.6%20pdf%20manual/The%20Unscrambler% 20Methods.pdf.

  26. Horwitz W, Latimer GW. Official methods of analysis of AOAC international. 18th ed. E.E.U.U.: Gaithersburg; 2011.

  27. Fernández J, Almela L, Obón J. Determination of antioxidant constituents in cactus fruit. Plant Foods Hum. 2010;65:253-9.

  28. Feugang JM, Konarski P, Zou D, et al. Nutritional and medicinal use of cactus pear (Opuntia spp.) cladodes and fruits. Frontiers in Bioscience. 2006;11:2574-89.

  29. Liguori G, Di Miceli C, Gugliuzza G, et al. Physiological and technical aspects of cactus pear [Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill.] double rellowering and out-of-season winter fruit cropping. International Journal of Fruit Science. 2006;6:23-34.

  30. Amaya-Robles JE. El cultivo de tuna (Opuntia ficus-indica). Gerencia Regional Agraria La Libertad; 2009. p. 35.

  31. Miler J, Miller J. Estadística y quimiométrica para química analítica. 4ª ed. México: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2002.

  32. American Dietetic Association. Clinical practice recommendations. Diabetes Care. 2013;16(Suppl 1):S21.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com