2017, Number 5
Comparation between subjective global assessment and modified subjective global assessment with anthropometric and laboratory markers for detecting risk of malnutrition in critically ill patients
Language: Spanish
References: 9
Page: 268-274
PDF size: 133.71 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Malnutrition is an importantproblem among ambulatory and hospitalized patients, specially en the setting of Intensive Care Units. There are several scales for diagnosing malnutrition, that require complicated measures and/or the use of biomarkers. The Subjective Global Assessment es a tool that help the clinician to assess malnutrition in a very simple way at the bedside, and offers a good correlation with the aforementioned trials. Adjustments in the Subjective Global Assessment have been made in order to make it fit to certain group of patients. The Modified Subjective Gobal Assessment in our facilities may be useful for correct diagnosis and therapeutic guidance. To assess this new scale it was compared with the two most sensible parameters for the malnutrition diangosis and its original scale.REFERENCES
McClave S, Taylor B, Martindale R, Warren M, Johnson D, Braunschweig C, et al. Guidelines for the provision and assessment of nutrition support therapy in the adult critically ill patient: Society of critical care medicine (SCCM) and american society for parenteral and enteral nutrition. ASPEN. 2016;44(2):390-438.
White J, Guenter P, Jensen G, Malone A, Shofield M, Academy Malnutrition Work Group, et al. Consensus statement: Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics and American Society of parenteral and enteral nutrition: characteristics recommended for the identification and documentation of adult malnutrition (Undernutrition). JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2012;36(6):275-283.