medigraphic.com
ISSN 1659-1046 (Print)
Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences

2017, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Odovtos-Int J Dent Sc 2017; 19 (2)

Effect of Different Silane Treatments on Long-Term Bonding Between Non-Etched Glass-Ceramic and Resin Cement

Murillo-Gómez F, De Goes MF

Language: Spanish
References: 26
Page: 33-46
PDF size: 370.88 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The present study evaluated the bond strength between glass-ceramic and resin cement, using different silane treatments, performing no previous hydrofluoric acid (HF) etching on ceramic surface, after short- and long- term storage. One hundred and eighty glass-ceramic plaques (IPS e.max CAD®) were polished and divided into six groups (n=30) to receive different silane treatments: (1) RCP-RelyX Ceramic Primer® (one-bottle silane), (2) RCP+SB-RelyX Ceramic Primer and Adper Singlebond2® (silane plus separated adhesive), (3) SBU-Scotchbond Universal® (silane-containing universal adhesive), (4) CP-Clearfil Ceramic Primer® (silane/MDP primer), (5) NC-no-silane (negative control) and (6) PC-Previous HF etching (5%, 20s) plus RelyX Ceramic Primer® (positive control). Two resin cement cylinders (Rely X Ultimate®) were built on each plaque. Each group was divided into two sub-groups to be stored for 24 hours (24h) or 6 months (6mo) in distilled water at 37°C (n=15). Then microshear (µSBS) testing was performed. Failure mode was analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data were statistically analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey´s test (α=0.05). Both factors and their interaction resulted statistically significant (p0.05). PC obtained the highest μSBS values (in MPa) at both storage times (24h: 28.11±2.44; 6mo: 19.10±3.85). After 24h storage, groups RCP+SB (10.86±3.62), SBU (8.37±4.33) and CP (8.05±3.62) were not statistically different from NC (8.00±2.51); only RCP (19.73±4.63) and PC obtained higher values. After 6 months, only PC showed higher values than NC (0.04±0.01). Cohesive failure in resin cement was more prevalent for RCP-24h and PC, while adhesive failure was more frequent among all other groups. Clinical relevance: None of the commercially available silane primers tested, improve long- term ceramic/cement bonding without performing HF etching on ceramic surface. Combination of HF acid and silane, remain as a gold standard treatment for glass-ceramic materials.


REFERENCES

  1. Peumans M., Van Meerbeek B., Lambrechts P., Van Herle G. Porcelain veneers: A review of literature. J. Dent, 2000; 28; 163-177.

  2. Ying Kei Lung C., Matinlinna J. P. Aspects of silane coupling agents and surface conditioning in dentistry: An overview. Dent Mater 2012; 28: 467-477.

  3. Blatz M. B., Dent M., Sadan A., Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J. Prosthet Dent. 2003; 89: 268-74.

  4. Scherrer S. S., de Rijk W. G., Belser U. C., Meyer J. M. Effect of cement film thickness on the fracture resistance of a machinable glass-ceramic. Dent Mater 1994; 10: 172–7.

  5. Brentel S. A., Özcan M., Valandro L. F., Guimarăes Alarҫa L., Amaral R., Bottino M. A. Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to feldspathic ceramic after different etching and silanization regimens in dry and aged conditions. Dent Mater 2007;23: 1323-1331.

  6. Chen J. H., Matsumura H., Atsuta M. Effect of etchant, etching period, and silane priming on bond strength to porcelain of composite resin. Oper Dent 1998; 23: 250-7.

  7. Addison O., Marquis P. M., Fleming G. J. The impact of hydrofluoric acid surface treatments on the performance of a porcelain laminate restorative material. Dent Mater 2006; 16.

  8. Dennerlein K., Kiesewetter F., Kilo S., Jäger T., Göen T., Korinth G., Drexler H. Dermal absorption and skin damage following hydrofluoric acid exposure in an ex vivo human skin model. Toxicology Letters 2016; 248: 25-33.

  9. Cömlekoğlu M. E., Dündar M., Güngör M. A., Sen B. H., Artunç C. Preliminary evaluation of titanium tetrafluoride as an alternative ceramic etchant to hydrofluoric acid. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 2009; 11: 447-53.

  10. Safety Data Sheet/instructions for use, 1907/2006/EC, Article 31. Clearfil™ Ceramic Primer, 01/04/2012. Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc., Okayama, Japan.

  11. Shimada Y., Yamaguchi S., Tagami J. Microshear bond strength of dual-cured resin cement to glass ceramics. Dent Mat 2002; 8: 380-388.

  12. Aida M., Hayakawa T., Mizukawa K. Adhesion of composite to porcelain with various surface conditions. J. Prosthet Dent 1995; 73: 464–70.

  13. Hooshmand T., van Noort R., Keshvad A. Bond durability of the resin bonded and silane treated ceramic surface. Dent Mater 2002; 18: 179–88.

  14. Matinlinna J. P., Lassila L. V. J., Özcan M., Yli- Urpo A., Vallittu P. K. An introduction to silanes and their clinical applications in dentistry. Int. J. Prosthodont 2004; 17: 155–64.

  15. Blatz M. B., Sadan A., Martin J., Lang B. In vitro evaluation of shear bond strengths of resin to densely sintered high-purity zirconium-oxide ceramic after long-term storage and thermal cycling. J. Prosthet Dent 2004; 91: 356–62.

  16. Kitayama S., Nikaido T., Takahashi R., Zhu L., Masaomi I., Foxton R., Sadr A., Tagami J. Effect of primer treatment on bonding of resin cements to zirconia ceramic. Dent Mater 2010; 26: 426-432.

  17. Pollington S., Fabianelli A., Van Noort R. Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to a novel fluorcanasite glass-ceramic following different surface treatments. Dent Mater 2010; 26: 864-872.

  18. Hooshmand T., van Noort R., Keshvad A. Storage effect of a pre-activated silane on the resin to ceramic bond. Dent Mater 2004; 20: 635-642.

  19. Shen C., Oh W. S., Williams J. R. Effect of post-silanization drying on the bond strength of composite to ceramic. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2004; 91: 453–8.

  20. Borges G. A., Spohr A. M., De Goes M. F., Correr-Sobrinho L., Chan D. C. N. Effect of etching and airborne particle abrasion on the microstructure of different dental ceramics. J. Prosthet Dent 2003; 89: 479-88.

  21. Sundfeld Neto D., Naves L. Z., Costa A. R., Correr A. B., Consani S., Borges G. A., Correr-Sobrinho L. The Effect of hydrofluoric acid concentration on the bond strength and morphology of the surface and interface of glass ceramics to a resin cement. Operative Dentistry 2015; 40: 470-479.

  22. Lastumaki T. M., Lassila L. V., Vallittu P. K. The semi-interpenetrating polymer network matrix of fiber-reinforced composite and its effect on the surface adhesive properties Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 2003; 14: 803-809.

  23. El Zohairy A. A., De Gee A. J., Hassan F. M., Feilzer A. J. The effect of adhesives with various degrees of hydrophilicity on resin ceramic bond durability Dental Materials 2004; 20: 778-787.

  24. Naves L. Z., Soares C. J., Moraes R. R., Gonçalves L. S., Sinhoreti M. A., Correr- Sobrinho L. Surface/interface morphology and bond strength to glass ceramic etched for different periods Operative Dentistry 2010; 35: 420-427.

  25. Material Safety Data Sheet, 2721. RelyX™ Ultimate R. F., 08/02/11. 3M ESPE, St. Paul, M. N., USA.

  26. Material Safety Data Sheet, 2721. Adper™ Single Bond Plus, 02/25/16. 3M ESPE, St. Paul, M. N., USA.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com