medigraphic.com
ISSN 1659-1046 (Print)
Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences

2017, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Odovtos-Int J Dent Sc 2017; 19 (1)

Automatic Electronic Device Used for the Evaluation of Cyclic-Fatigue Resistance of Nickel-Titanium Instruments

Gaitán-Fonseca C, Lara-Alvarado E, Flores-Reyes H, Pozos-Guillén A, Méndez-González V

Language: English
References: 29
Page: 51-58
PDF size: 260.08 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to evaluate the cyclic-fatigue fracture of different Nickel-Titanium motor-driven rotary instruments (ProTaper® Universal, ProFile®, and Mtwo® systems) in artificial canals by means of an Automatic Electronic Device (AED). The study was performed using Nickel- Titanium instruments 25/0.06 evaluated in canals with a 45-degree curvature and 2-mm radius. The analyses evaluated two parameters: fracture by cyclic fatigue, and time of fracture; in addition, the length of separated fragment was evaluated. Medians and range values were calculated for each group. Data were analyzed by the Kruskall–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests to determine statistical difference. The ProFile motor-driven rotator system exhibited highest resistance to fracture due to cyclic fatigue and highest fracture time compared with the ProTaper and Mtwo systems (p ‹0.05). The equipment proposed in this study (AED) demonstrated efficiency for recording information, automation, scheduled work times and durations, cycle number, time of fracture, pressure changes and, principally control of the human factor.


REFERENCES

  1. Hiran-Us S., Pimkhaokham S., Sawasdichai J., Ebihara A., Suda H. Shaping ability of ProTaper NEXT, ProTaper Universal and iRace files in simulated S-shaped canals. Aust Endod J. 2016; 42 (1): 32-6.

  2. Gambarini G., Gergi R., Grande N. M., Osta N., Plotino G., Testarelli L. Cyclic fatigue resistance of newly manufactured rotary nickel titanium instruments used in different rotational directions. Aust Endod J. 2013; 39 (3): 151-4.

  3. Lee W., Hwang Y. J., You S. Y., Kim H. C. Effect of reciprocation usage of nickeltitanium rotary files on the cyclic fatigue resistance. Aust Endod J. 2013; 39 (3):146-50.

  4. Topçuoğlu H. S., Pala K., Aktı A., Düzgün S., Topçuoğlu G. Cyclic fatigue resistance of D-RaCe, ProTaper, and Mtwo nickel-titanium retreatment instruments after immersion in sodium hypochlorite. Clin Oral Investig. 2016; 20 (6): 1175-9.

  5. Li U. M., Lee B. S., Shih C. T., Lan W. H., Lin C. P. Cyclic fatigue on endodontic nickel titanium rotary instruments: static and dynamic tests. J. Endod. 2002; 28 (6): 448-51.

  6. Chaves Craveiro de Melo M., Guiomar de Azevedo Bahia M., Lopes Buono V. T. Fatigue resistance of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J. Endod. 2002; 28 (11): 765-9.

  7. Capar I. S., Ertas H., Arslan H. Comparision of cycle fatigue resistance of novel nickeltitanium rotary instruments. Aust Endod J. 2015; 41 (1): 24-8.

  8. Arslan H., Alsancak M., Doğanay E., Karataş E., Çapar I. D., Ertas H. Cyclic fatigue analisis of Reciproc R25® instruments with different kinematics. Aust Endod J. 2016; 42 (1): 22-4.

  9. Crump M. C., Natkin E. Relationship of broken root canal instruments to endodontic case prognosis: a clinical investigation. J. Am Dent Assoc. 1970; 80 (6): 1341-7.

  10. Pettiette M. T., Conner D., Trope M. Procedural errors with the use of nickeltitanium rotary instruments in undergraduate endodontics. J. Endod. 2002; 28 (3): 259.

  11. Al-Fouzan K. S. Incidence of rotary ProFile instrument fracture and potential for by passing in vivo. Int Endod J. 2003; 36 (12): 864 -7.

  12. Yared G. M., Bou Dagher F. E., Machtou P. Cyclic fatigue of ProFile rotary instruments after clinical use. Int Endod J. 2000; 33 (3): 204-7.

  13. Grande N. M., Plotino G., Pecci R, Bedini R., V. A. Malagnino, F. Somma. Cyclic fatigue resistance and threedimensional analysis of instruments from two nickel– titanium rotary systems. Int Endod J. 2006; 39 (10): 755-63.

  14. Cheung G. S., Darvell B. W. Fatigue testing of a NiTi rotary instrument. Part 1: strain-life relationship. Int Endod J. 2007; 40 (8): 612-8.

  15. Eggeler G., Hornbogen E., Yawny A., Heckmann A., Wagner M. Structural and functional fatigue of NiTi shape memory alloys. Mater Sci Eng A. 2004; 378 (1-2): 24-33.

  16. Sattapan B., Nervo G. J., Palamara J. E., Messer H. H. Defects in rotary nickeltitanium files after clinical use. J. Endod. 2000; 26 (3): 161-5.

  17. Gabathules H., Hassell T. A pressure sensitive periodontal probe. Helv Odontol Acta. 1971; 15 (2): 114-7.

  18. Schneider San W. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1971; 32 (2): 271-5.

  19. Thompson S. A. An overview of nickeltitanium alloys used in dentistry. Int Endod J. 2000; 33 (4): 297-310.

  20. Young G. R., Parashos P., Messer H. H. The principles of techniques for cleaning root canals. Aust Endod J. 2007; 52 (1 Suppl): S52-63.

  21. Gambarini G. Cyclic fatigue of nickeltitanium rotary instruments after clinical use with low- and high-torque endodontic motors. J. Endod. 2001; 27 (12): 772-4.

  22. Haikel Y., Serfaty R., Bateman G., Singer B., Allemann C. Dynamic and cyclic fatigue of engine driven rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J. Endod. 1999; 25 (6): 434-40.

  23. Tripi T. R., Bonaccorso A., Condorelli G. G. Cyclic fatigue of different nickel-titanium endodontic rotary instruments. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006; 102 (4): e106-14.

  24. Schäfer E., Erler M., Dammaschke T. Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. Int Endod J. 2006; 39 (3): 196-202.

  25. Soo-Youn H., So-Ram O., Yoon L., Sang- Min L., Kee-Yeon K. Effect of cross-sectional area of 6 nickel-titanium rotary instruments on the fatigue fracture under cyclic flexural stress: A fractographic analysis. J. Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2009; 34 (5): 424-9.

  26. Plotino G., Grande N. M., Cordaro M., Testarelli M., Gambarini G. A Review of cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J. Endod. 2009; 35 (11): 401-3.

  27. Testarelli L., Grande N. M., Plotino G., Lendini M., Pongione G., De Paolis G., et al. Cyclic fatigue of different nickel-titanium rotary instruments: A comparative study. Open Dent J. 2009; 3: 55-8.

  28. Gambarin G., Grande N. M., Plotino G., Somma F., Garala M. Fatigue resistance of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium instruments produced by new manufacturing methods. J. Endod. 2008; 34 (8): 1003-5.

  29. Pedullà E., Lo Savio F., Boninelli S., Plotino G., Grande N. M., La Rosa G., Rapisarda E. Torsional and cyclic fatigue resistance of a new nickel-titanium instrument manufactured by electrical discharge machining. J. Endod. 2016; 42, (1): 156-9.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com