medigraphic.com
ISSN 1560-4381 (Print)

2017, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Correo Científico Médico 2017; 21 (3)

Local causes of permanent canines retained in patients of the 'René Guzmán Pérez' Dental Clinic of Calixto García

Quevedo AJL, Mas TM, Mayedo NY, Sierra RY

Language: Spanish
References: 19
Page: 627-636
PDF size: 404.23 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: impacted teeth are those that do not erupt in the right place of the dental arch at their chronological age.
Objectives: to determine the main local causes of permanent impacted canines in admitted patients from the Orthodontic Service at "René Guzman Pérez" the Dental Clinic, in Calixto García municipality.
Methods: an observational descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out from January 2012 to January 2013. Admitted patients from the Orthodontic Service with permanent impacted canines composed the investigation universe. The sample was composed by 108 patients between 10 and 19 years of age who presented to the clinic, to which a diagnose of retained teeth was made.
Results: the female sex was the most affected one with 58.3%. In the subgingival position, in the maxillary arch, 61 patients were included (56.5%), 24 from male sex (22.2%) and 37 from females (34.3%). The major local cause was the tooth- bone negative disagreement observed in 45 patients (41.7%).
Conclusions: the permanent impacted teeth was predominant in the female sex in proportion 1.4/1, in respect with male sex. The problem was mainly observed in subgingival position, particularly in the superior maxillary. The tooth- bone disagreement, the elongated maintenance of temporary canines and the premature loss of temporary teeth were the main local causes of canine retention.


REFERENCES

  1. Otaño Lugo R. Longitud del arco. En: Manual clínico de ortodoncia. La Habana: Científico-Técnica; 2008. p. 96 – 133.

  2. Harry Archer W. Atlas paso por paso de técnicas quirúrgicas. En: Cirugía bucal. TI. La Habana: Científico-Técnica; 1971.p.124–137.

  3. Canut Brusola JA. Anomalías volumétricas: apiñamiento, impactación dentaria y diastemas. En: Ortodoncia clínica y terapéutica. 2a ed. Barcelona: Masson; 2002.p.431–40.

  4. Otaño Lugo R, Fernández Torres C, Castillo R, Grau León I, Marín Manso GM, Maddón Barceló RM, et al. Guías prácticas clínicas de oclusión. En: Guías Prácticas de Estomatología. La Habana: Ciencias Médicas; 2003.p.430-438.

  5. Santoyo Deddens C, Calleja Ahedo I, García Hernández J, Díaz Romer RM. Prevalencia de caninos superiores retenidos en pacientes mexicanos mayores de 14 años de la Facultad de Odontología de la Universidad Tecnológica de México. ADM. 2008[citado 26 abr 2017]; 58 (4):138-142. Disponible en: http://new.medigraphic.com/cgi-bin/resumen.cgi?IDARTICULO=5573

  6. Macias Escalada E, Cobo Plana J, Carlos Villafranca F, Pardo López B. Abordaje ortodóncico quirúrgico de las inclusiones dentarias. RCOE. 2005 [citado 13 Abr 2017]; 10(1): 69-82. Disponible en: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1138-123X2005000100006&lng=es

  7. Grohman U. Aparatología en Ortopedia funcional. Alemania: Amolca; 2012.

  8. Shafer WG, Heine MK, Leroy BM, Tomich ChE. Tratado de patología bucal. México: Nueva Interamericana; 2010.

  9. Richardson G, Russell KA. A Review of Impacted Permanent Maxillary Cuspids: Diagnosis and Prevention. J Can Dent Assoc. 2009 [citado 10 feb 2017]; 66(9):497-501. Disponible en: cda-adc.ca/jcda/vol-66/issue-9/497.pdf

  10. Ries Centeno GA. Cirugía Bucal. En: Patología clínica y terapéutica. 9na ed. Buenos Aires: Mundi; 1987. p. 128-145.

  11. Sáez Fernández A, García Espona I. Análisis de las retenciones dentarias en población ortodóncica. Ortod Esp 2004[citado 13 abr 2017]; 44(1):14-24. Disponible en: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=4550863

  12. Bjerklin K, Bondemark L. Management of Ectopic Maxillary Canines. Angle Orthod. 2008[citado 13 abr 2017]; 78(5):852–859. Disponible en: http://www.angle.org/doi/abs/10.2319/070307-306.1?code=angf-site

  13. Varela M. Caninos superiores incluidos. En: Ortodoncia Interdisciplinaria. Barcelona: Océano; 2008.p.305–361.

  14. Faiq Qaradaghi I. Bilateral transmigration of impacted mandibular canines: report of two cases and review. Rev Clín Pesq Odontol. 2010[citado 13 abr 2017]; 6(3):271-275.Disponible en: www2.pucpr.br/reol/index.php/AOR?dd1=4464&dd99=pdf

  15. Almanza Escobar NI. Frecuencia de caninos permanentes retenidos. Clínica Estomatológica Manuel Angulo Farrán 2011(Tesis) Holguín: Universidad de Ciencias Médicas “Mariana Grajales Coello”; 2011.

  16. Chaney, Fanny. Clínica y Terapeútica. Argentina, Buenos Aires: Bibliográfica; 1975.

  17. Masson C, Papadakou P, Roberts GJ. The radiographic localization of impacted maxillary canine: a comparison of methods. Eur J Orthod. 2001[citado 13 abr 2017]; 23(1):25-34. Disponible en: https://academic.oup.com/ejo/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/ejo/23.1.25

  18. Aydin U, Yilmaz HH. Transmigration of impacted canines. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2003[citado 13 abr 2017]; 32 (3): 198-200. Disponible en: http://www.birpublications.org/doi/10.1259/dmfr/38819077

  19. Proffit W, Fields H. Ortodoncia contemporánea. 3ra ed. Madrid: Harcourt; 2012.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com