Calvo F, Murayama N, Justus DR, Ondarza RR, García-López S

Language: Spanish
References: 14
Page: 140-147
PDF size: 300.24 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Objective: To assess the detachment of tubes bonded to the first molars on a resin surface without surrounding dental enamel, which were bonded with the same restorative resin Empress Direct and the Transbond XT resin, testing three preparation methods of the resin surface. Material and methods: The sample consisted of 120 third molars, which were prepared with cavities in the buccal aspect and restored with Empress Direct, which in turn, were divided into six groups. In the case of groups I and II 37% phosphoric acid was placed on the surfaces of the resin restorations; the tubes were bonded on the surface using for group I Empress Direct resin and for group II, Transbond XT. On groups III and IV phosphoric acid and silane were placed; the tubes were bonded with the two types of resin in the same way as in groups I and II. In groups V and VI the resin surface was sandblasted with 50 µ aluminum oxide and conditioned with 37% phosphoric acid and silane. Finally, we evaluated the tubes bond strength. Results: Group I, in which 37% phosphoric acid was used, the bond strength was 2.71 ± 1.06 (MPa) and for Group II, it was 3.32 ± 1.06 (MPa). Group III, in which phosphoric acid and silane was used had a bond strength of 4.45 ± 1.46 (MPa) and group IV showed a bond strength of 6.64 ± 1.93 (MPa); for group V which used sandblasting, orthophosphoric acid and silane, bond strength was 9.55 ± 3.0 (MPa) and for group VI it was 10.56 ± 3.88 (MPa). Conclusions: The bond strength of tubes increases when the resin surface is prepared with sandblasting, 37% phosphoric acid and silane with both Empress Direct and Transbond XT resins.

REFERENCES

1. Viwattanatipa N, Jermwiwatkul W, Chintavalakorn R, Kanchanavasita W. Weibull analysis of bond strength of orthodontic buccal tubes bonded to resin composite surface with various techniques. Orthodontic Waves. 2010; 69 (2): 66-74.

2. Craig RG, Powers JM, Wataha JC. Dental materials. Missouri, EUA: Editorial Mosby; 2000.

3. Spyrou M, Koliniotou-Koumpia E, Kouros P, Koulaouzidou E, Dionysopoulos P. The reparability of contemporary composite resins. Eur J Dent. 2014; 8 (3): 353-359.

4. Eslamian L, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Mousavi N, Ghasemi A. A comparative study of shear bond strength between metal and ceramic brackets and artificially aged composite restorations using different surface treatments. Eur J Orthod. 2012; 34 (5): 610-617.

5. Viwattanatipa N, Prasertsangwal J, Juntavee N. Weibull analysis of shear/peel bond strength of orthodontic buccal tubes bonded to five resin composites. Orthodontic Waves. 2008; 67: 120-127.

6. Ribeiro AA, de Morais AV, Brunetto DP, Ruellas AC, de Araujo MT. Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontics brackets on composite resin restorations with different surface treatments. Dental Press J Orthod. 2013; 18 (4): 98-103.

7. Goldstein RE, Parkins FM. Air-abrasive technology: its new role in restorative dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc. 1994; 125 (5): 551-557.

8. Chen HL, Lai YL, Chou IC, Hu CJ, Lee SY. Shear bond strength of provisional restoration materials repaired with light-cured resins. Oper Dent. 2008; 33 (5): 508-515.

9. Eslamian L, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Mousavi N, Ghasemi A. The effects of various surface treatments on the shear bond strengths of stainless steel brackets to artificially-aged composite restorations. Aust Orthod J. 2011; 27 (1): 28-32.

10. Lai PY, Woods MG, Tyas MJ. Bond strengths of orthodontic brackets to restorative resin composite surfaces. Aust Orthod J. 1999; 15 (4): 235-245.

11. Eslamian L, Ghassemi A, Amini F, Jafari A, Afrand M. Should silane coupling agents be used when bonding brackets to composite restorations? An in vitro study. Eur J Orthod. 2009; 31 (3): 266-270.

12. Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod. 1975; 2 (3): 171-178.

13. Pinzan-Vercelino CR, Pinzan A, Gurgel JA, Silva-Bramante F, Maio-Pinzan L. In vitro study of shear bond strength in direct bonding of orthodontic molar tubes. Dental Press J Orthod. 2011; 16 (3): 60-68.

14. Legler LR, Retief DH, Bradley EL, Denys FR, Sadowsky PL. Effects of phosphoric acid concentration and etch duration on the shear bond strength of an orthodontic bonding resin to enamel. An in vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989; 96 (6): 485-492.