Santos MA, De Jesus TRR

Language: Portugués
References: 26
Page: 245-255
PDF size: 122.32 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: bone regeneration of the posterior maxilla is an important feature to enable correct placement of implants and thus allow an adequate prosthetic rehabilitation. Several surgical techniques are reported, since the form of access to the sinus, elevation of Schneider membrane and fill the cavity.
Objective: to address the resources used in bone regeneration surgery of the posterior maxilla and the effectiveness of the methods applied.
Methods: an electronic search of the literature was performed in the databases LILACS, MEDLINE and BBO studies published in English and Portuguese. The inclusion criteria were considered articles between 2000 and 2014, with the key words that guided the search were: maxillary bone regeneration, Schneiderian membrane, maxillary sinus lift. 1 529 articles were obtained, of which 27 selected articles relevant to the study. Exclusion criteria were eliminated in the articles which were in the year below 2008 and fleeing the matter at hand.
Data analysis and integration: it was found that the traditional technique of access to the maxillary sinus with the use of drills, lifting the membrane through curettes, and the regeneration itself with autogenous bone graft and/or heterogeneous continue as the most commonly used, however alternative as less invasive ultrasonic technology to access, hydrodissection to raise the Schneider membrane and biomaterials to fill the cavity emerge as viable, with favorable results options.
Conclusions: there is a direction in the search for methods and materials that reduce the morbidity of traditional techniques and which offer satisfactory results in the short and long term. The use of surgical techniques less invasive and use of biomaterials are among the advances for the regeneration of the posterior maxilla.

REFERENCES

1. Kanayama T, Sigetome T, Sato H, Yokoi M. Crestal approach sinus floor elevation in atrophic posterior maxila using only platelet rich fibrina as grafting material: A computed tomography evaluation of 2 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Med Pathol. 2014;26(4):519-25.

2. Bensaha T. Evaluation of the capability of a new water lift system to reduce the risk of Schneiderian membrane perforation during sinus elevation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;40(8):815-20.

3. Cakur B, Sümbüllü MA, Durna D. Relationship among Schneiderian membrane, Underwood's septa, and the maxillary sinus inferior border. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013;15(1):83-7.

4. Nooh N. Effect of schneiderian membrane perforation on posterior maxillary implant survival. J Int Oral Health. 2013;5(3):28-34.

5. Wallace SS, Tarnow D, Froum S, Cho S. Maxillary sinus elevation by lateral window approach: evolution of technology and technique. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2012;12(3 Suppl):161-71.

6. Rapani M, Rapani C. Sinus floor lift and simultaneous implant placement: a retrospective evaluation of implant sucess rate. Indian J Dent. 2010;25(3):598-606.

7. Li J, Lee K, Chen H, Ou G. Piezoelectric surgery in maxillary sinus floor elevation with hydraulic pressure for xenograft and simultaneous implant placement. J Prosthet Dent. 2013;110(5):344-8.

8. Baldi D, Menini M, Pera F, Ravera G, Pera P. Sinus floor elevation using osteotomes or piezoelectric surgery. International. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;40(5):497-503.

9. Kim YK, Ahn KJ, Yun PY. A retrospective study on the prognosis of single implant placed at the sinus bone graft site. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013;118(2):181-6.

10. Jesch P, Bruckmoser E, Bayerle A, Eder K, Bayerle-Eder M, Watzinger F, al. A pilot-study of a minimally invasive technique to elevate the sinus floor membrane and place graft for augmentation using high hydraulic pressure: 18-month followup of 20 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013;116(3):293-300.

11. Sbordone C, Toti P, Guidetti F, Califano L, Bufo P, Sbordone L. Volume changes of autogenous bone after sinus lifting and grafting procedures: a 6-year computerized tomographic follow-up. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013;41(3):235-41.

12. Tamaki H, Nakayama H, Takano Y. Histological and histochemical analyses of cell-mediated resorption of anorganic bovine bone matrix at the site of sinus floor augmentation in humans. J Oral Biosci. 2010;52:187-200.

13. Xuan F, Lee CU, Son JS, Jeong SM, Choi BH. A comparative study of the regenerative effect of sinus bone grafting with platelet-rich fibrina-mixed bio-oss and commercial fibrina-mixed bio-oss: an experimental study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014;42(4):e47-50.

14. Rickert D, Vissink A, Slot WJ, Sauerbier S, Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM. Maxillary sinus floor elevation surgery with BioOss® mixed with a bone marrow concentrate or autogenous bone: test of principle on implant survival and clinical performance. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;43(2):243-7.

15. Cypher TJ, Grossman JP. Biological principles of bone graft healing. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1996;35(5):413-7.

16. Bae JH, Kim YK, Kim SG, Yun PY, Kim JS. Sinus boné graft using new alloplastic bone, graft material (osteon) —II: clinical evaluation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;109(3):e14-20.

17. Si MS, Zhuang LF, Gu YX, Mo JJ, Qiao SC, Lai HC. Osteotome sinus floor elevation with or without grafting: a 3-year randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2013;40(4):396-403.

18. Acharya C, Hinz B, Kundu SC. The effect of lactose-conjugated silk biomaterials on the development of fibrogenic fibroblastos. Biomaterials. 2008;29(35):4665-75.

19. Tseng LL, Ho C, Liang W, Hsieh Y. Comparison of efficacies of diferent bone substitutes adhered to osteoblastos with and without extracelular matrix proteins. J Dent Sci. 2013;8(4):399-404.

20. Gandhi YR, Singh M, Singh N. Implants in maxillary sinus. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2012;3(2):214-7.

21. Carbonell JM, Martín IS, Santos A, Pujol A, Sanz-Moliner JD, Nart J. Highdensity polytetrafluorethylene membranes in guided bone and tissue regeneration procedures: a literature review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;43(1):75-84.

22. Li X, Chen SL, Zhu SX, Zha GQ. Guided bone regeneration using collagen membranes for sinus augmentation. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;50(1):69-73.

23. Gassling V, Purcz N, Braesen JH, Will M, Gierloff M, Behrens E, et al. Comparison of two diferent absorbable membranes for the coverage of lateral osteotomy sites in maxillary sinus augmentation: A preliminar study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013;41(1):76-82.

24. Jensen T, Schou S, Stavropoulos A,Terheyden H, Holmstrup P. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation with Bio-Oss or Bio-Oss mixed with autogenous bone as graft in animals: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;41(1):114-20.

25. Stiller M, Kluk E, Bohner M, Lopez-Heredia MA, Müller-Mai C, Knabe C. Performance of β-tricalcium phosphate granules and putty, boné grafting materials after bilateral sinus floor augmentation in humans. Biomaterials. 2014;35(10):3154-63.

26. Voss P, Sauerbier S, Wiedmann-Al-Ahmad M, Zizelmann C, Stricker A, Schmelzeisen R, et al. Bone regeneration in sinus lifts: comparing tissueengineered bone and iliac bone. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;48(2):121-6.