Castillo-Maya G, Peñaloza-López Y, Hernández-Orozco F, Soda-Merhy A, Méndez-Vera JL, Galicia-Martínez G, Corvera-Bernardelli J, Corvera-Behar G

Language: Spanish
References: 68
Page: 509-520
PDF size: 347.43 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Objective: This study explored a number of factors that determine the professional status of physicians in Mexico. Methods: Using structural equation modelling techniques, causal models were developed to investigate the determinants of professional status within the medical field. Results: The findings suggest that the proposed stratification process in the causal model has empirical support. In the prestige dimension, there is an adscriptive effect of gender, the resultant gender segregated the Mexican medical profession; in addition the achievement effects of medical education and work history within significant occupational and bureaucratic structures. In the economic dimension, the ascriptive effect of gender and the resultant differential in income and job opportunities of female physicians exist. Conclusions: Although social origin seems to have a weak effect on the dimensions of professional status, it is suggested that both medical education and employment history were both significant positive determinants of professional status in the Mexican medical system. On the other hand, there are still significant gender inequities in the stratification structure of the medical profession.

REFERENCES

1. 1. Sculerati N. Genetic basis of hearing loss en world wide web: www. Sculerati.com/index.html

2. 2. Arnos KS, Israel J, Cunningham M. Genetic counseling of the deaf. Medical and cultural considerations. Ann NY Acad Sci 1991;630:212-22.

3. 3. Parving A, Stephens D. Profound permanent hearing impairment in childhood: causative factors in two European countries. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1997;117:158-160.

4. 4. Green GE, Van Camp G, Smith RJH. Hereditary hearing loss and deafness overview. world wide web: www.uia.ac.be/dnalab/hhh

5. 5. Kalatzis V, Petit C. The fundamental and medical impacts of recent progress in research on hereditary hearing loss. Hum Mol Genet 1998:1589-1597.

6. 6. Denoyelle F, Weil D, Maw MA, Wilcox SA, Lench NJ, Allen Powell DR, Osborn AH, Dahl HH, Midleton A, Houseman MJ, Dode C, Marlin S, Boulila-ElGaied A, Grati M, Ayadi H, BenArb S, Bitoun P, Lina-Granada G, Godet J, Mustapha M, Loiselet J, ElZir E, Aubois A, Joannarde A, Petit C, Et al. Prelingual Prelingual deafness: high prevalence of a 30delG mutation in the connexin 26 gene. Human Molecular Genetics 1997,6 2173-7.

7. 7. Smith RJH, Scott DA, Sheffield VC, Van Camp G DFNB1-autosomal recessive non-syndromic hearing loss. world wide web www:www.uia.ac.be/dnalab/hhh

8. 8. Jacobson TJ. Nosology of deafness J Am Acad Audiol 1995;6:15-27.

9. 9. Joint Committee on Infant Hearing 1994 Position Statement. Joint Committee on Hearing. Pediatrics 1995;95:1.

10. Snashall S. Childhood deafness In: Ludman H, Wright T. editors. Diseases of the ear. 6th ed. Arnold; 1997. p. 166.

11. Peñaloza Y. Otosclerosis. En: Medicina de la Comuni-cación Humana p. 451-457 1994 Ed. SSA.

12. Prezant TR, Agapian JV, Bohlman MC, Bu X, Oztas S, Qiu WQ, Arnos KS, Cortopassi GA, Jaber L, Rotter JI. Mitochondrial ribosomal RNA mutations associated with both antibiotic-induced and non-syndromic deafness. Nat Genet 1993;4:289-94.

13. Passchier-Vermeer W. Noise exposure and hearing impairment in young people. Audiology in practice VII/4 Excerpta Medica. Med Com p. 2-5.

14. Bai V, Seidman MD, Hinojosa R, Quirk WS. Mitochondrial DNA deletion associated with aging and possibly presbyacusis: a human archival temporal bone study. Am J Otol 1997;18:449-53.

15. Gilad O, Glorig A. Presbyacusis: the aging ear. Part II J Am Soc 1979;4:207-17.

16. Montes de Oca FE, Martínez M del C. Estimación del problema auditivo en México. An ORL Mex 1999;44:8-12.

17. Solís Chávez A, Valle Valenzuela M, Montes de Oca FE, Paniagua Vázquez B, Mena Ayala JC, Juárez NM. Detección de niveles de ruido y trauma acústico en una planta rehidratadora de leche. An ORL Mex 1999;44:17-20.

18. Criteria for a recommended standard occupational noise exposure. Revised criteria. Education and Information. Biomedical and Behavioral Division. In: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health DHHS (NIOSH). Publication No. 96 XXX. Science. 1996; August 12.

19. Maue HJ. Noise exposure of motorcyclists. Audiology in practice. VII/4. Excerpta Medica. Med Com p. 6-8.

20. Arlinger S. Occupational hearing loss in musicians. Audiology in practice VII/l. Excerpta Medica Med Com B.V. p. 1-4.

21. Axelsson A, Lindgren F. Does pop music cause hearing loss? Audiology 1977;16:432-437.

22. Browning GG. Sudden hearing loss. In. Clinical otology and audiology. 2nd ed. Oxford UK: Buterworth Heinemann; 1998. p. 66.

23. Hughes G, Freedman M, Haberkamp T, Guay M. Sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1996;(2):393-405.

24. Hughes BG, Moscicki RA. Immune iner ear disease. In: Highlights of the Instruction courses. American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. St. Louis, MO, USA: Mosby; 1995.

25. Heller U, Becker EW, Zenner HP, Berg PA. Incidence and clinical relevance of antibodies to phospholipids, serotonin and ganglioside in patients with sudden deafness and progressive inner ear hearing loss. HNO (Germany) 1998;46:583-6.

26. Suckfull M, Zacharias S. Exploratory analysis of risks factors of acute inner ear dysfunctions. Laryngorhinootologie 1999;78:4-8.

27. Stokroos RJ, Albers FW, Schirm J. The etiology of idiopathic sudden hearing loss. Experimental herpes simplex virus infection of the inner ear. Am J Otol 1998;447-52.

28. Stokroos RJ, Albers FW, Schirm J. Therapy of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: antiviral treatment of experimental herpes simplex virus infection of the inner ear. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol (May) 1999;108:423-8.

29. McCabe BF. Autoimmune sensorineural hearing loss. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1979;88:585-589.

30. Suzuki M, Harris PJ. Expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 during inner ear inflammation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1995;104:69-75.

31. Brackmann DE, Syms CA T III. Tumors of the auditory-vestibular nerve. In: Ludman H, Wright T, editors. Diseases of the ear. Arnold. 6th ed. London: Arnold; 1997. p. 536.

32. 1. Wayoft M, Chobaut JC. L'otospongiose encyel. Med Chir. Paris. Otorhinolaryngologie 1983;4:2995-10.

33. 2. Guild SR. Histologic. Otosclerosis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1994;53:246.

34. 3. Niedermeyer HP, Arnold W, Neubert WJ, Sedlmeier R. Persistent measles virus infection as a possible cause of otosclerosis: state of the art. Ear Nose Throat J 2000; 79(8):552-58.

35. 4. Arnold W, Niedermeyer HP, Altermatt HJ, Neubert W. Pathogenesis of otosclerosis State of the art. HNO- Germany 1996;44(3):121-9.

36. 5. Svatko LG. Pathogenetic aspects of otosclerosis. Vestn Otorrinolaringol 1995;(3):24-7.

37. 6. Singhal SK, Mann SB, Datta U, Panda NK, Gupta AK. Genetic correlation in otosclerosis. Am J Otolaryngol 1999;20(2):102-5.

38. 7. Linthicum Flt, Filipo R, Brody S. Sensorineural hearing loss due to cochlear otospongiosis: theoretical considerations of etiology. Ann Otol 1975;84:544-551.

39. 8. Schknecht H. Otosclerosis pathology of the ear. 2nd ed. Pennsylvania, Lea & Febiger; 1993. p. 365-379.

40. 9. Hannley MT. Audiologic characteristics of the patient with otosclerosis. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1993;26(3): 373-87.

41. Zaghis A. Some observations concerning 200 stapedectomies fifteen years postoperatively. Laryngoscope 1987;97:1211-1213.

42. Sismanis A. Coexisting otosclerosis and Meniere's disease a diagnostic and therapeutic dilema. Laryngoscope. 1986;94:9-13.

43. Liston SL. Otosclerosis and endolimphatic Hydrops. Laryngoscope. 1984;94:1003-7.

44. Perkins RC. Laser Stapedectomy for otosclerosis. Laryngoscope 1980;90-228.

45. Lescanne E, Robier A, Soin C, Manceau A, Benlyazid A, Beutter P. Otosclerosis surgery; a series of 227 cases. Introduction of CO2 laser. Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cerv Fac 1999;116(1):28-36.

46. Palomar V, Romeu C, Traserra C, Ghani F, Soteras J. Otosclerosis surgery with C02 laser. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 1999;50(5):345-7.

47. Marquet T. Stapedectomy techniques and results. Am J Otol 1985;6:63-67.

48. Shea JT. Stapedectomy techniques and results. Am J Otol 1985;6.61-62.

49. Bonding P. Surgical treatment of otosclerosis, effects and risks. Publication Year. 1989;151(6):381-384.

50. Lucic M. Surgical treatment of otosclerosis. Using stapedectomy. Publication Year. 1989;46(3)187-190.

51. Arroyo Castelazo MA, Pérez de León P, Soda M. Otosclerosis, experiencia quirúrgica 1982-1991. Anal Otorrino 1992;39(4):363-367.

52. Levy R. Stapedectomy techniques and results. Laryngoscope. 1990;100:1097-99.

53. Moon N. Partial vs total footplate removal in stapedectomy. Laryngoscope 1984;94:912-914.

54. Persson P, Harder H, Magnuson B. Hearing results in otosclerosis surgery after partial stapedectomy, total stapedectomy, and stapedotomymand. Acta Otolaryngologica 1997;117(1):94-9.

55. Ueda H, Miyazawa T, Asahi K. Yanagia N. Factors affecting hearing results after stapes surgery. Journal of Laryngology & Otology. 1999;113(5):417-21.

56. Cremers WJR. Hearing Gain After Stapedectomy Platynectomy, or Total Stapedectomy for otosclerosis. 1991;100(12):959-961.

57. 1. Djourno A, Eyries C. Prosthese auditive par excitation electrique a distance du nerf sensorial a l'aide d'un bobinage inclus a demeure. Presse Med 1957;35:144.

58. 2. House WF. The clinical value of single electrode system in auditory prostheses, Otolaryngol Clin N Am 1978:11:201-208.

59. 3. Parkins, CS, Anderson, SW. Cochlear prostheses: an International Symposium. Ann NY Acad Sci 1983;405:1-530.

60. 4. Dorman MF. Speech perception by adults. In Tyler RS, editor. Cochlear implants audiological foundations. San Diego, CA, USA: Singular Publishing Group; 1993.

61. 5. Fryauf-Bertschy H, et al. Performance over time of congenitally deaf and postlingually deafened children using a multi-channel cochlear implant, J Speech Hearing Res 1992;35:913.

62. 6. Miyamoto RT, et al. Prelingually deafened children's performance with the nucleus multi-channel cochlear implant, Am J Otol 1993;14:437.

63. 7. Gantz B, et al. Long term results of multi-channel cochlear implants in congenitally deaf and prelingually deafened children. Am J Otol 1994;15(suppl):1.

64. 8. Corvera G, Corvera J, Ysunza A, Pamplona M. Experience with four different cochlear implant systems. In: Fraysse B, Deguine O, editors. Cochlear implants: new perspectives. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. Basel, Switzerland: Karger, 1993;48:269-273.

65. 9. Corvera G, Corvera J, Ysunza A, Pamplona MC. Experiencia con cuatro sistemas de implante coclear. An ORL Mex 1993;38:11-14.

66. Corvera G, Corvera J, Ysunza R, Pamplona MC. Indicaciones y utilidad de los implantes cocleares. Gaceta Med Mex 1993;129:389-392.

67. Corvera G, Corvera J. Considérations éthiques et économiques sur les implants cochléaires dans les pays en voie de développement. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol 1991;112:413-414.

68. Cohen NL, Waltzman SB. Cochlear Implants: an overview and update. Ch. XII. Cummings' Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. Mosby Electronic Library of Otolaryngology. Mosby-Year Book, Inc.; 1996.