Caravia PI, Muradás AM, García RR

Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 60-67
PDF size: 225.58 Kb.

ABSTRACT

A thematic review of the history of the measurement of Apgar in the newborn, created by Virgina Apgar in 1952. From then to the date have been applied by different surgical specialties and published their results from 2009. In the specialty of Urology it is also used since 2009 with the study of complications in radical cystectomies. It is not until 2015 that these studies applied to renal tumors are republished. It is considered that this predictive scheme of postoperative complications and death in the specialty of Urology has a high applicability and is the reason for its updating.

REFERENCES

1. Caravia Pubillones I, Vela Caravia I. Aplicabilidad de la clasificación de Clavien y Dindo en las complicaciones quirúrgicas de urología. Revista Cubana de Urología. 2015 [citado en diciembre 2016];4(2). Disponible en: http://www.revurologia.sld.cu/index.php/rcu/issue/view/9

2. Casey BM, McIntire DD, and Leveno KJ. The Continuing value of the Apgar Score for the assessment of newborn infants. N Engl J Med. 2001. Feb 15 [citado en diciembre 2016];344(7):467-71. Diponible en: http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM200102153440701#t=article

3. Gawande AA, Kwaan MR, Regenbogen SE, Lipsitz SA, Zinner MJ. An Apgar Score for Surgery. J Am CollSurg. 2004 April [citado octubre de 2016]; (4):201-6. Disponible en: http://www.atulgawande.com/documents/AnApgarScoreforSurgery.pdf.

4. Regenbogen SE, Ehrenfeld JM, Lipsitz SR, Greenberg CC, Hutter MM, Gawande AA. Utility of the Surgical Apgar Score validation in 4 119 patients. Arch Surg. 2009 [citado en noviembre 2016];144(1):30-6. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19153322

5. Haynes AB, Regenbogen SE, Weiser TG, Lipsitz SR, Dziekan G, Berry WR, Gawande AA. Surgical outcome measurement for a global patient population: Validation of the Surgical Apgar Score in 8 countries. Surgery. 2011;149(4):519-24. Disponible en: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039606010005830

6. Gawande A. Surgical Apgar Score (SAS) for Post-Operative Risk. Predicts post-operative risk of major complication, including death. Página web. [citado en enero 2017]. Disponible en: https://www.mdcalc.com/surgical-apgar-score-sas-post-operative-risk.

7. Sanders NW, Schildcrout JS, Mercaldo ND, Jacques PJS. Expansion of the Surgical Apgar Score across All Surgical Subspecialties as a Means to Predict Postoperative Mortality. Anesthesiology. 2011 [citado en diciembre 2016] 114;(6):1305-12. Disponible en: http://anesthesiology.pubs.asahq.org/article.aspx?articleid=1933498

8. Haddow JB, Adwan H, Clark SE, Tayeh S, Antonowicz SS, Jayia P, et al. Use of the surgical Apgar score to guide postoperative care. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2014 Jul [citado en noviembre 2016];96(5):352-8. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4473931/

9. Regenbogen SE, Ehrenfeld JM, Lipsitz SR, Greenberg CC, Hutter MM, Gawande AA. Utility of the Surgical Apgar Score validation in 4119 patients. Arch Surg. 2009 [citado en noviembre 2016];144(1):30-6. Disponible en: http://www.atulgawande.com/documents/2009ArchSurg--UtilityofApgarScore.pdf

10. Prasad, SM Ferreria, M Berry, AM Lipsitz, SR Richie. Surgical Apgar scores: perioperative risk assessment for radical cystectomy. J Urol. 2009;181:1046-050

11. Ito T, Abbosh PH, Mehrazin R, Tomaszewki J, Li T, Ginzburg S, et al. Surgical Apgar Score precit an increades risk of major complications and death after mass excision. J Urol. 2015 April;93(4):1918-204.

12. Krajewski W, Zdrojowy R, Tupikowski K, Ma·kiewicz B, Ko·odziej A. -How to lower postoperative complications after radical cystectomy- a review. Cent European J Urol . 2016 [citado en diciembre 2016];69(4):370-6. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5260457/