2017, Number 1
<< Back Next >>
Anales de Radiología México 2017; 16 (1)
Micturating cystourethrography: a review of the diagnostic method and its usefulness in the study of common disorders
Ramírez-Arango J, Ruiz LA, Maldonado GA, Herrera MC
Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 20-30
PDF size: 570.80 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Background: Micturating cystourethrography is a study used since
1903 for diagnosing urinary tract disorders; it remains in use despite
the existence of much more advanced diagnostic techniques due to
its ease of access, low cost, and high effectiveness. Proper testing
technique, combined with knowledge of the most common disorders,
will allow the radiologist to offer an accurate diagnosis avoiding more
complex studies.
Objetive: review of diagnostic method, its indications, technique,
and characterization of the most common diseases diagnosed by that
technique, in patients studied at a private radiology center in Mexico
City.
Material and Methods: a descriptive, retrospective and review
study, which reviewed reports from cystourethrograms stored in the
Research Information Systems (RIS), taken at CT Scanner del Sur from
January 2013 through March 2016.
Results: we analyzed 84 cystourethrograms from 21 men, 54 women,
and 9 minors; we found that the most prevalent diagnoses were urethral
stenosis in men and effort or stress incontinence in women. In minors,
vesicoureteral reflux and cystitis were the most common.
Conclusion: the results are consistent with the findings reported in
the specialized literature, where obstructive urethral pathology and
stress incontinence are the diagnoses most commonly found by this
method in men and women, respectively. In children, congenital and
inflammatory pathologies are the most common, as they were in our
study.
REFERENCES
Jean J, Manyak M, Harisinghani M: Imaging in oncological urology ed (2). London Springer 2014, pp 40-45
Kawashima A, Sandler C, Wasserman N y cols: Imaging of Urethral Disease: A Pictorial Review. RadioGraphics 2004;(24):195-S216.
Cisneros R, Chávez M, Aragón A y cols: Estenosis uretral: etiología y tratamiento. Experiencia en el Centro Médico ISSEMYM. Rev Mex urol 2013;73(5):229-236.
Robles J : La incontinencia urinaria. An. Sist. Sanit. Navar. 2006;29(2):219-232.
Jequier S, JequierJ : Reliability of voiding cystourethrography to detect reflux. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989;153(4):807-10.
Shaikh N, Rover M: Identification of children and adolescents at risk for renal scarring after a first urinary tract infection: a meta-analysis with individual patient data. JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168(10):893-900.
Hoffman S. Fernbach K, Feinstein M: Pediatric Voiding Cystourethrography: A Pictorial Guide. RadioGraphics 2000;(20):155–168. A B C D
Berna M, Berna S, Aparicio M: Urethrography in Men: Conventional Technique versus Clamp Method. Radiology 2009:(1):240-246.
Roos J, Weishaupt D, Wildermuth S y cols: Experience of 4 Years with Open MR Defecography: Pictorial Review of Anorectal Anatomy and Disease. RadioGraphics 2002;(22):817-832.
Mendez J : Radiología convencional de la incontinencia urinaria. Clínicas Urológicas de la Complutense, 2000;(8):103-115.
Nam C, Raman S, Patel M y cols: Fistulas of the Genitourinary Tract: A Radiologic Review. RadioGraphics 2004;(24):1331-1352.
Usabiaga I y cols: .Tecnicas de imagen en el reflujo vesicoureteral. Arch. Esp. Urol. 2008 (61) 135-146.
Gupta J Prrasd K, Goel S y cols. Pictorial essay: Congenital anomalies of male urethra in children. The Indian Journal of Radiology & Imaging. 2011;21(1):38-45.
Berrocal T, Lopez P, Arjonilla A y cols: Anomalies of the Distal Ureter, Bladder, and Urethra in Children: Embryologic, Radiologic, and Pathologic Features. RadioGraphics 2002;(22):1139-1164.
Berrocal T, Gaya F, Arjonilla A y cols: Vesicoureteral Reflux: Diagnosis and Grading with Echo-enhanced Cystosonography versus Voiding Cystourethrography. Radiology 2001;(221):359-365.