medigraphic.com
Coordinación General de Investigación de la Facultad de Salud Pública y Nutrición y la Dirección General de Sistemas e Informática de la Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León

2016, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Salud Publica Nutr 2016; 15 (3)

Estado nutricional en una comunidad universitaria en Armenia – Quindío

Nieto COA, Rodríguez NL, Victoria SM

Language: Spanish
References: 25
Page: 16-27
PDF size: 247.68 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Nutritional status is the balance between needs and energy expenditure. With the information obtained from the evaluation of anthropometric, biochemical, food studies the nutritional status of individuals or population groups is determined. Objectives: To describe the nutritional status of a university community in Armenia - Quindio. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study, which took as its population people in a university community in Armenia was conducted - Quindio: Students, teachers and administrators during 2015; the variables were described on average, standard deviation and confidence intervals, with a comparative analysis by sex and group. Results: Significant differences between groups: age in students was 21.08 years, teachers and administrative 47.25 43.88 (p = 0.0000). The average waist circumference was 78.22 cm in students, teachers and 91.25 cm 87.51 cm in administration (p = 0.0000). And BMI was 23.52, 25.87 and 26.38 respectively. Waist hip ratio of 0.70 students in teaching and administrative 0.88 0.84 (p = 0.0000). The percentage of daily consumption of cereals, tubers and plantains was 82.40 %, 76.85 % water, 56.94 % fruits, dairy 51.38 %, 42.59 % and vegetables. Significant differences consumption of bakery products, fried and fast foods (p = 0.0000), egg (p = 0.0020), alcohol (p = 0.0056), sweet (p = 0.594) and taste vegetables (p = 0.0064) in students and administrative fruit consumption (p = 0.0106). Conclusions: When comparing indicators such as BMI, waist circumference and waist-hip ratio the group with higher nutritional risk is administrative, with a statistically significant difference.


REFERENCES

  1. Acosta J. Valoración del Estado Nutricional en el paciente grave. Intensivos 2008.

  2. Aranceta J, Pérez C, Serra LL, Mataix J. Evaluación del estado nutricional. En Nutrición y Dietética. Aspectos Sanitarios. Consejo General de Colegios Oficiales de Farmacéuticos. 1993. p. 827-74.

  3. Arvaniti F, Panagiotakos DB. Healthy indexes in public health practice and research: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2008; 48:317–27. 7

  4. Bailey KV, Ferro L. Use of body mass index of adults in assessing individual and community nutritional status. WHO Bulletin. OMS. Vol 73 1995.

  5. Becerra-Bulla Fabiola, Vargas-Zarate Melier. Estado nutricional y consumo de alimentos de estudiantes universitarios admitidos a nutrición y dietética en la Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Rev. salud pública. 2015; 17: 762-75.

  6. Dehollaín P. Conceptos y factores condicionantes de la Seguridad Alimentaria en hogares. Archivos Latinoamericanos de Nutrición. 1995; 45: 338-40.

  7. Dooley J, Chang AM, Salhi R, Hollander JE. Relationship between Body Mass Index and Prognosis of Patients Presenting With Potential Acute Coronary Syndromes. Acad Emerg Med. 2013; 20(9): 904–10.

  8. Encuesta Nacional de la Situación Nutricional: ENSIN. Ministerio de protección social de Colombia, Instituto Colombiano de Bienestar Familiar. 2010.

  9. Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive Summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA. 2001; 285(19): 2486-97.

  10. FAO y OMS. Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Agricultura y la Alimentación/Organización Mundial de la Salud. Conferencia Internacional sobre Nutrición: Nutrición y desarrollo - una evaluación mundial; Roma: 1992. 18-24.

  11. Fransen HP, Ock´e MC. Indices of diet quality. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2008; 11:559–65.

  12. FUNCOBES. Fundación Colombiana de Obesidad. Guías colombianas para el manejo científico de la obesidad y sobrepeso. 2015. 83 pp.

  13. Garrow JS, Webster J. Quetelet's index (W/H2) as a measure of fatness. Int J Obes. 1985; 9:147-53.

  14. Gibson RS. Principles of nutritional assessment. 2nd Ed. Oxford University Press, 2005.

  15. Gómez-Cruz Z, Landeros-Ramírez P, Romero-Velarde E, Troyo- Sanromán R. Estilos de vida y riesgos para la salud en una población universitaria. Revista de Salud Pública y Nutrición. 2016; 15:16-21.

  16. González-Jiménez E, Montero-Alonso MA, Schmidt-Rio Valle J. Estudio de la utilidad del índice de cintura-cadera como predictor del riesgo de hipertensión arterial en niños y adolescentes. Nutr. Hosp. 2013. 28: 1993-98.

  17. Horton DK, Adetona O, Aguillar-Villalobos M, Cassidy BE, Pfeiffer CM, Schleicher RL et al. Changes in the concentrations of biochemical indicators of diet and nutritional status of pregnant women across pregnancy trimesters in Trujillo, Peru, 2004–2005. Nutrition Journal 2013; 12: 1-11.

  18. Martín G. Valoración del estado nutricional. En: Nutrición en atención primaria. Unidad de Nutrición Clínica y Dietética. Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid. 2001. p. 43-54.

  19. Nolla NP, Kana Sop MM, Djeukeu WA, Tetanye E, Gouado, I. Assessment of nutritional status and food consumption in Makepe Missoke, Douala, Cameroon. Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences. 2013; 4:1-7.

  20. Organización panamericana de la salud. Prevención de las enfermedades cardiovasculares, directrices para la evaluación y el manejo del riesgo cardiovascular. Washington, D.C. OPS. 2010.

  21. Ortiz L. Evaluación nutricional de adolescentes. Rev Med IMSS. 2002; 40:223-32.

  22. Ravasco P, Anderson H, Mardones F. Métodos de valoración del estado nutricional. Nutr. Hosp. 2010; 25:57-66.

  23. Villareal DT, Apovian CM, Kushner RF, Klein S. The Obesity Society: Obesity in older adults: technical review and position statement of the American Society for Nutrition and NAASO. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005; 82:923-34.

  24. WHO: World Health Organization. Expert Committee on Physical Status: The use and interpretation of anthropometric physical status. 1995.

  25. Zea-Robles AC, León-Ariza H, Botero-Rosas DA, Afanador- Castañeda HD, Pinzón-Bravo LA. Factores de riesgo cardiovascular y su relación con la composición corporal en estudiantes universitarios. Rev. salud pública. 2014; 16: 505-15.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com