2017, Number 1
<< Back Next >>
Rev Mex Anest 2017; 40 (1)
Regional upper limb anesthesia in reconstructive plastic surgery
Carrillo-Córdova JR, Ruiz-Beltrán S, Bracho-Olvera H, Jiménez-Murat Y, Carrillo-Esper R, Díaz Ponce-Medrano JA, Carrillo-Córdova LD
Language: Spanish
References: 18
Page: 38-46
PDF size: 322.51 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Regional anesthesia of the upper limb is a common procedure
with considerable advantages in treating patients with arm and hand pathologies.
Most of them present as trauma, congenital abnormalities and benign
and malignant tumors. Some of its advantages are less postoperative pain;
faster recovery and less hospital stay days. Some of the minimum requirements
of this technique includes an experienced anesthesiologist, a cooperative
patient and in some cases, ultrasound to guide the block.
Conclusions: Regional anesthesia of the upper limb is an excellent therapeutic option when treating arm and hand pathologies. Both anesthesiologists and plastic and
reconstructive surgeons benefit from its use achieving a better recovery and
satisfaction of the patients.
REFERENCES
Liu S, Irwin M. Regional anesthesia for orthopedic procedures. Anest Inten Care Med. 2015;16:97-102.
Brull R, McCartney CJ, Chan VW, El-Beheiry H. Neurological complications after regional anesthesia: contemporary estimates of risk. Anesth Analg. 2007;104:965-974.
Bafiq N, Bafiq R, Harty J. Patient perspective of regional anesthesia of upper limb surgery. Int J Surg. 2013;11:589-685.
Chekkets M. Intravenous regional anesthesia. Anest Inten Care Med. 2015;17:192-193.
Ghodki PS, Singh ND. Incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paresis after peripheral nerve stimulator versus ultrasound guided interscalene brachial plexus block. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2016;32:177- 181.
Urmey WF, talts KH, Sharrock NE. One hundred percent incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paresis associated with interscalene brachial plexus anesthesia as diagnosed by ultrasonography. Anesth Analg. 1991;72:498- 503.
Lanz E, Theiss D, Jankovic D. The extent of blockade following various techniques of brachial plexus block. Anesth Analg. 1983;62:55-58.
Winnie AP. Interscalene brachial plexus block. Anesth Analg. 1970;49:455-466.
Gautier P, Vandepitte C, Ramquet C, DeCoopman M, Xu D, Hadzic A. The minimum effective anesthetic volume of 0.75% ropivacaine in ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block. Anesth Analg. 2011;113:951-955.
Lopera-Velásquez LM, Restrepo-Garcés C. Bloqueo axilar guiado por ultrasonido y neuroestimulador. Rev Colomb Anestesiol. 2016;44:30- 35.
Ustuner E1, Yilmaz A, Özgencil E, Okten F, Turhan SC. Ultrasound anatomy of the brachial plexus nerves in the neurovascular bundle at the axilla in patients undergoing upper-extremity block anesthesia. Skeletal Radiol. 2013;42:707-713.
Thompson GE, Rorie DL. Functional anatomy of the brachial plexus sheaths. Anesthesiology. 1983;59:117-122.
Neal JM, Gerancher JC, Hebl JR, Ilfeld BM, McCartney CJ, Franco CD, et al. Upper extremity regional anesthesia: essentials of our current understanding, 2008. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009;34:134-170.
Franco CD, Gloss FJ, Voronov G, Tyler SG, Stojiljkovic LS. Supraclavicular block in the obese population: an analysis of 2020 blocks. Anesth Analg. 2006;102:1252-1254.
Gauss A, Tugtekin I, Georgieff M, Dinse-Lambracht A, Keipke D, Gorsewski G. Incidence of clinically symptomatic pneumothorax in ultrasound-guided infraclavicular and supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Anaesthesia. 2014;69:327-336.
Monkowski D, Collante L. Distal upper extremity blocks. Techniques in Regional Anesthesia and Pain Management. 2006;10:132-136.
Bas H, Kleinert JM. Anatomic variations in sensory innervation of the hand and digits. J Hand Surg Am. 1999;24:1171-1184.
Ben-David B. Complications of peripheral blockade. Anesthesiol Clin North Am. 2002;20:695-707.