Medina BM, Palmer MLY, Quiñones MKA, Medina RMC, López PDA

Language: Spanish
References: 18
Page: 44-47
PDF size: 160.55 Kb.

ABSTRACT

The syndrome of mobbing is a problem that arises in the workplace and means violence, harassment or psychological abuse. The general objective is to know the frequency of the syndrome of mobbing in medical specialists. An observational, descriptive, transversal, prospective, single centre study was conducted in physicians of a Pediatrics Hospital with family medicine (HGP/MF) Nº 31 of the IMSS in Mexicali B. C. The data collection was performed through the inventory of psychological harassment and violence at work IVAPT-PANDO. Surveyed 77 physicians, 42 women (54.5%) and 35 men (45.5%); 41 pediatricians (53.2%), 17 Gynecologists (22.1%), 16 Anesthesiologists (20.8%) and 3 doctors of the work (3.9%). It was determined that there is the presence of high psychological violence in 31 participants (40.3%) and average in 23 participants (29.9%). With respect to intensity, was medium in 10 respondents (12.9%) and high in 4 (5.19%). Psychological harassment was determined in 8 doctors (10.38%).

REFERENCES

1. Fuentes R. Mobbing: manifestaciones corporales al vivir un proceso de acoso laboral. Neurol Neurocir Psiquiatr. 2008;41(1):13-20.

2. Fuentes-Valdivieso R. Acoso laboral o mobbing y violencia de género. Rev Sanid Milit Mex. 2013;67 (1):33-7.

3. Meseguer M, Soler M, García-Izquierdo M, Sáez M, et al. Los factores psicosociales de riesgo en el trabajo como predictores del mobbing. Psicothema. 2007; 19(2):225-30.

4. Pando M, Aranda C, Preciado L, Franco S, et al. Validez y confiabilidad del inventario de violencia y acoso psicológico en el trabajo (Ivapt-Pando). Enseñanza e Investigación en Psicología. 2006;11(2): 319-32.

5. Peña F. Cuando el trabajo nos castiga. Revista Latinoamericana de Derecho Social. 2008;7:355-63.

6. Acosta M, Torres T, Díaz D, Aguilar M, et al. Autopercepción de presuntos perpetradores de acoso psicológico en el trabajo. Un acercamiento fenomenológico. Salud Uninorte. 2012;28(1):27-35.

7. Lallukka T, Rahkonen O, Lahelma E. Workplace bullying and subsequent sleep problems - the Helsinki Health Stud. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2011;37(3):204-12.

8. Vie T, Glasø L, Einarsen S. How does it feel? Workplace bullying, emotions and musculoskeletal complaints. Scand J Psychol. 2012;53:165–73.

9. Signorelli M, Costanzo M, Cinconze M, Concerto M. What kind of diagnosis in a case of mobbing: post-traumatic stress disorder or adjustment disorder? BMJ Case Rep. 2013;10:1136.

10. Nolfe G, Petrella C, Zontini G, Uttieri S, et al. Association between bullying at work and mental disorders: gender differences in the Italian people. Soc Psychiat Epidemio. 2010;45:1037-41.

11. Pando M, Aranda C, Parra L, Gutiérrez A. Determinación del mobbing y validación del Inventario de violencia y Acoso Psicológico en el Trabajo (Ivapt) para Colombia. Salud Uninorte. 2013;29(3):525-33.

12. Ortíz S, Jaimes A, Tafoya S, Mujica M, et al. Experiencias de maltrato y hostigamiento en médicos residentes. CirCir. 2014; 82:290-301.

13. Quien L. Workplace bullying in nurses. J Health Psychol. 2001;6(1):73-84.

14. Dellasega C. Bullying among nurses. Am J Nurs. 2009;109(1):52-8.

15. Chen WC, Hwu HG, Kung SM, Chiu HJ, et al. Prevalence and determinants of workplace violence of health care workers in a psychiatric hospital in Taiwan. J Occup Health. 2008;50(3):288-93.

16. Ofluogu G, Somunoglu S. Cases of mobbing activities as commonly seen in the healthcare sector in the world and in Turkey. Hosp Top. 2012;90(4): 98-103.

17. Nielsen M. Bullying in work groups: The impact of leadership. Scand J Psychol. 2013;54:127-36.

18. Carvajal J G, Dávila CA. Mobbing o acoso laboral. Revisión del tema en Colombia. Cuadernos de Administración. 2013;29(49):95-106.